Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Have You Filled a Bucket Today?


For a beautiful character-strengthening message inside a great story, try this book for the 4-8 year old crowd: "Have You Filled a Bucket Today?" The premise of the book is that we all have an invisible bucket and when we do kind things for others (helping others, saying something nice, including people, giving a hug) we fill their buckets and we fill ours at the same time. When we are unkind to people (calling them names, being a bully, hitting) we dip into their bucket and our own. The fuller your bucket is, the happier you are, so the idea is to keep your bucket full through kind deeds as much as possible.

The book has one seven awards and is a best seller. Many school districts in Michigan, where the author, Carol McCloud lives, have adopted not only the book, but Bucket Filling programs in their schools, allowing students to nominate and recognize kindness in others to promote those qualities in their student body.

The book really resonates with children. It gives many colorful examples of how to fill and dip into a bucket that kids can relate to. The visual of the bucket helps them to understand how this works and to sort out their own feelings. It is a great way of promoting not only kindness but compassion as well. This is one of my kids' favorite books and each time they do a good deed they comment on how many buckets that deed filled. For example, for our theme of giving this month we have fed the homeless several times and each time we do it, they comment on how we not only fed people today but filled their buckets and ours too. They love that!

I got to know the publisher of this book, Nelson Publishing and Marketing when I was trying to publish my own children's story. Although I decided not to publish it for various reasons, I became impressed with Marian Nelson's vision. Unlike most publishers, she will publish books by first time authors, but she will only publish books that somehow further such attributes as peace, tolerance, and understanding. Her mission is to create a greater understanding of humanity through the written word. I've read many of her books and that is exactly what her books do. I really respect that.

As I got to know Marian better she asked if I would be interested in selling her books in Colorado. I readily agreed even though I know it is not going to make me a wealthy woman, it is in alignment with promoting the greater good in people. If you are interested in seeing the other book titles that they offer, or in possibly publishing a book of your own, go to www.nelsonpublishingandmarketing.com. If you want to buy the books you can do so through their website, or if you are local I am happy to get you a copy of "Have You Filled a Bucket Today?"

Monday, November 16, 2009

Homeschooling Will Make Me a Better Buddhist

I decided that my son is my Buddhist teacher in many ways. It is often the case that the people who are the most challenging and difficult are those that teach us the most about ourselves and improve us in many ways. Because this is my (unpaid) job, he is essentially one of those difficult a co-workers - the only difference is that I love him deeply and his negativity is not merely annoying, it bothers me because I want the best for him. But just as he is, he will every day challenge me to remain calm, equanimous, unattached to an outcome or image, loving, patient, present, encouraging, compassionate.... He is a HARD teacher but good for me nevertheless. When I look at it this way, I do not get so bothered by his self-doubt and resistance (see last post titled "I Can't/It's Too Hard".)

Much as I try some days, I really cannot control my kids, but I can be aware of myself and control my own reaction. If I am clear on what is important to me and why, I can more effectively pause and reevaluate what is working and what is not, rather than what it is I am fearing. My friend James, a wise Buddhist, pointed out that frustration is a reflection of an attachment to something I want to happen to make me feel better. He reminded me that if we stay centered and present without letting what is happening reflect on our "goodness" or "ability" we can meet the challenges with much greater equanimity. I realized I am attached to Ronan showing back up in a school someday knowing a certain amount (reading, math, etc.) so that I don’t look bad as a homeschooler and so that he doesn’t struggle again. However, if I let that go and facilitate his learning where I can, in the best way I know how, it will work out fine. If he is a slow reader or not great with his time tables, is that really the end of the world for either of us? No. Of course not. It will come and he will be fine.

It is ironic that it is because I love him and care for him that I get frustrated with his response, and this frustration causes feelings of anger and separation in both of us. The irony is that love + attachment = anger and frustration. If I just choose to love him without attachment or worry it remains as just love. When I stop being attached to a response and just start meeting the one given, everything goes a lot better for both of us, just as James said it would. I have found that working on equanimity alone is enough to also increase compassion, love, and patience. I think it is also the case that if you focus on any one of those qualities, the others fall into place as well.

It is enough for me to know that I think I am doing a good job - that I am constantly striving, reading, researching and planning to make this experience the best I know how. Just like any other teacher, my students' performance is not necessarily an indicator of how I do my job. We cannot control everything. Besides, it doesn't really matter what others think anyway. If I look for detractors I will find them. If I look for supporters, I will find them. They are always there.

My greatest desire is that our children do well in life. This means to me that they are happy, resilient, capable, compassionate, and healthy among other things. I don't care so much what they grow up to be as long as they are happy with their carefully made choices. If I work backward to help them achieve that goal, it looks more like a strong family life, a meaningful education based on their interest, the building of confidence through daily risk and success.... It doesn't have much to do with reading assessments or math scores come to think of it. This realization and the longer term goal helps keep my perspective. And my sanity.

Let me be clear, I am not homeschooling for religious reasons. I've chosen to homeschool for a number of reasons, though religion is not one of them. I prefer to broaden their education, not narrow it, as one friend stated it succinctly. But it may be that my exploration on the path of Buddhism might be what allows me to teach with equanimity and joy for learning. My kids may not become Little Buddhas - that is not the goal, but what they might appreciate is how I show up everyday as the Buddhist homeschooler instead of the fearful, controlling homeschooler.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

I Can't/It's Too Hard

Some days homeschooling, like any other job is really hard. For me, it's not ever that the work is difficult, but managing my emotions and handling my student's reactions is not always a pleasurable experience. Perhaps it is because I am an optimistic, can-do person that I find that the most trying aspect of teaching (and parenting - it's hard to separate that sometimes) is the self-defeating, pessimistic talk I get from my kids.

My older son had a difficult time in first grade in the public school setting due to a vision problem and reading readiness, so there truly were many parts of school that he could not yet handle. Back then, "I can't" and "It's too hard" were not only true statements but effective ways of getting easier and more appropriately challenging work to him. However, I've noticed that he has come to rely on such statements to get out of doing anything challenging and new. What he typically means by either one of these is closer to "I don't want to".

This week was particularly frustrating to me in a couple of different ways. In one lesson I was trying in several different ways to describe place value to him, but he was so busy telling me he didn't get it that he wasn't actually listening to me tell him what it was about. After several different explanations and attempts to try it together, he finally got it - so much so that we determined we should stop because it was way too easy for him. In another episode, I made pretzel dough for them and asked my older son to create three or four words out of his dough (he just had to copy it). This took him an hour with so much whining and complaining about how hard it was. It wasn't the spelling or copying of the words, but for him it was the perfectionism - he wasn't getting the letters the same size so that they would cook evenly.

We've tried to handle this a number of different ways to overcome his tendency to identify himself from a position of weakness. We've shared with him the quote by Henry Ford: "Whether you believe you can do a thing or not, you are right." After reading a story about the Wright Brothers, we discussed that as it related to the their dream to fly - something that was thought to be impossible or at least too hard back then.

We have treated the subject with humor, actually making a song up to one of the Harry Potter Puppet Pals tunes, with the words "I can't", "It's too hard", "please!", "why", "I don't want to". They thought it was pretty funny and it is a great way to make light of the subject, but I can't say it has stopped it.

We've read books on and discussed perfectionism and why that is self-defeating. I explained that it takes courage to try things you may not be good at initially and even pointed out how when he started walking, talking and skateboarding he wasn't particularly good at any of them until he practiced. I even stopped saying the word "quiz" and now call it "an arena for mistakes", which helped one day but not the rest.

Today I thought of talking about "The Boy Who Cried Wolf", explaining to him that when he complains all of the time about his work, it is tough to know when it is really too difficult and when he is just not wanting to do the work.

I cannot control his reaction and I do want to be helpful, patient and responsive. Perhaps the biggest lesson in this for me is to manage my own reaction, to remain calm, optimistic, patient and helpful in the midst of so much whining.

Lesson planning is pretty fun and easy. Teaching reading and explaining math is not nearly as hard as I thought it would be. It is this that I find the hardest part about teaching. There has to be a better way, but I don't know that I have found it yet. I welcome suggestions.

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Differences Between Waldorf and Montessori - Classroom Structure

In a recent article I highlighted a few of the differences between two alternative education modalities: Waldorf and Montessori, focusing on classroom materials and fantasy versus reality. In this article I will explore the differences between the two in terms of the classroom structure and teaching.

In Montessori, transitions are structured in three year cycles. Students typically stay with a teacher for three years (less time for babies and toddlers) and there is a three year age span grouped together. This cohort works well in many ways. As the children get older, they take pride in showing the younger kids around the classroom and getting them acquainted with the rules and customs. The oldest children get plenty of experience in leadership and nurturing. The younger children seem to really like getting help and instruction from their peers.

Being in the classroom with the same teacher for three years is beneficial in that the teacher gets ample time to really get to know the children and to see them grow. Because there are three different age groups in the classroom and because of the nature of most Montessori classrooms with the students' ability to choose their own work, it enables all students to learn at their own pace. Montessori classrooms are set up with "work stations" full of manipulative materials that the students are allowed to choose to use. When it is done in pure Montessori fashion (which is not always the case) it is very student-directed rather than teacher-directed. The teacher acts as a facilitator and supervisor. This is anything but chaotic though. There is a hum to the classroom but the students are engaged in their work. In addition to academics, there is an emphasis on harmony, social graces, personal responsibility, independence, productivity and quiet. Montessori teaches "the whole child" and art and music are components of their day, usually done as "specials" taught by different teachers in different classrooms.

Parents with high energy children may initially find this untraditional classroom to be a good fit because students are not forced to sit in a desk all day, but it takes a high degree of personal responsibility and independence to thrive in this kind of classroom and many parents with these energetic children did not think the unstructured Montessori classroom worked well for them.

In Waldorf classrooms, the children are all generally the same age starting in first grade and they are with the same teacher for eight years in most cases. The students shift classrooms each year but all stay together. There are many advantages to this structure as well. The Waldorf teacher has the time to form a strong community. The teachers, parents, and students become a family after so long together. It promotes continuity and even more of a deep understanding of each child's growth and abilities. There is often the fear that if there is a poor fit between a teacher and a student, eight years is a long time, but this is relatively rare. Waldorf teachers tend to be very committed (it's a way of life for them, not just a job) and are also highly educated. They generally have plenty of support in their community as well to help students in any way they can. Because they teach more than just academics (the are also artists, musicians, singers, actors, story-tellers, knitters, etc.) there is plenty of ways to reach a child in ways beyond academics.

The Waldorf classroom resembles a conventional classroom in that learning is teacher-directed, not student-directed, there are desks (or tables) rather than work stations, and the day is very structured. Just like in conventional settings there are benefits and drawbacks to this arrangement. However, because the children get daily nature walks, art, music, and knitting, among other things (usually done by the main teacher in the same classroom - they are very talented, renaissance people!) there is opportunity for creating and movement that help with classroom management. In the pre-school setting, the classrooms look much more chaotic and are louder than any Montessori I have ever seen, but fantasy and play are being encouraged more than productivity and quiet as in the Montessori classrooms.

Our family was very fortunate to have gotten to know both of these modes of education and we appreciated many aspects to both of them. It is interesting to me that they are both alternative education and both have the goal of teaching to the whole child, yet they go about doing that in very different ways. The outcome is typically good for children in both environments.

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

What to Do About All of that Homework!

My guest blogger today is someone who is making positive changes by kindly questioning authority, educating people and getting involved. Kerry Dickinson writes a blog called East Bay Homework Blog eastbayhomework.blogspot.com and she was part of a task force that successfully rewrote an outdated homework policy in her school district. Last week Kerry wrote:

Homework is a hot button topic. Anyone who has ever been a student, is currently a student or who is the parent of a student has an opinion about homework. Today when I Google “homework ” I find 40,100,000 results. Many of these homework sites offer tips to help children with their homework and accept the status quo – that homework has been a part of the American public school tradition since the early 1900s and will remain a big part of our education system for many years to come.

I hope not.

But I didn’t always feel this way. I’m trained as a middle and high school teacher of English, history, and reading. During my teacher training, I accepted and believed in the validity of homework. After all, I went through school, did some homework, became a teacher and turned out fine, so homework must have helped me achieve those goals, right?

But I didn’t have a lot of homework as a child, and I didn’t mind doing the homework I did have. It wasn’t until I had my own children that I really began to question the value of homework. But, sadly, that didn’t happen until they were in the 6th and 8th grades. Why did it take me so long to really examine their homework and question its importance?

It took me so long because I believed everything I was told about homework. “It reinforces learning. It teaches discipline and responsibility. It prepares students for class…”

But what happens when it doesn’t do those things? What happens when I did everything I was told to do by the school – set up a regular homework routine, gave my children a healthy snack before they start their homework, provide a quiet, well-lit place for them to do their homework – yet they still struggled with it?

What happens when we explored more avenues of homework help for one of our boys in particular (multiple tutors, special education resources, psychological testing, medication) and he still struggled with homework?

At some point, I finally stopped blaming my child for his homework limitations and started blaming everything else around him. I blamed the school, I blamed the teachers, I blamed the administration, I blamed the system, I blamed myself, I blamed my parenting, I blamed it on his ADHD. But when the blaming didn’t change the fact that he still struggled with homework, and still had hours and hours of it, I finally changed my attitude about it.

All this homework turmoil was a blessing in disguise.

One day I finally started really looking at the homework he was being asked to do. I read “The Homework Myth” by Alfie Kohn and I had a revelation about homework. I agreed with almost everything Kohn wrote in that book, and felt a huge sense of relief that I wasn’t the only educated person out there who disagreed with the idea of homework and hated what it did to our family evenings, weekends and holidays. “Most kids hate homework. They dread it, groan about it, put off doing it as long as possible. It may be the single most reliable extinguisher of the flame of curiosity.” (17)

I found Sara Bennett’s website www.StopHomework.com and that became an excellent daily resource for me and helped me see that there were many more educated people all over the US who disagreed with the idea of homework. I also read her book, “The Case Against Homework,” and got many good ideas from it. I read countless Internet articles and more books on homework. I talked to and emailed people about homework. I learned about Challenge Success, Denise Pope’s program at Stanford. I started learning about many other pro-child programs that shared my views of homework.

I enlisted the help of a friend, Julie, who shared my feelings about education and homework. We got a small group of parents together to talk about homework. We found that as soon as we starting discussing homework as a group, the talk quickly morphed into discussions of parenting, education, standardized testing, ADHD, teacher-training, college admissions, curriculum development, student stress, AP classes, childhood obesity, mental health issues, competitive sports, tutors, over-scheduled lives, finding balance, etc. We concluded that there were many problems surrounding homework and no simple solutions, yet we wanted to do something about it.

We took an informal email survey about homework from other parents in our district and got 100 responses that we collected in a spreadsheet. We brought that along with many articles and books on homework to a meeting we had with our school district’s curriculum instruction director. A week after that, the district (which serves over 27,000 students) formed a homework task force to rewrite the outdated policy. I was fortunate enough to be on the taskforce as a parent representative. The taskforce had 19 total participants – a combination of parents, teachers and administrators.

We rewrote the policy in under a year. It was a difficult process where 19 opinionated individuals had to agree on something cohesive to be presented to the Board of Education. I personally enlisted Sara Bennett's help during this process. While I think the new policy is better policy than the original one, I think it still has a long way to go to being a really great, “outside of the box,” forward-thinking homework policy. To read the policy, go to: http://sites.google.com/site/eastbayhomework/

For example, I would have liked to include an “opt-out” provision where parents could sign a statement saying they are opting out of having their child do homework with no negative consequences to the child. I would have liked to see a statement included about the fact that any homework assigned would not be graded. I would have liked to see shorter time limit guidelines on homework. I would have liked to see that homework would be the exception and not the rule. I would have liked it to be more similar to Toronto’s homework policy. You can read that here: http://sites.google.com/site/torontoshomeworkpolicy/

Even if I didn’t get exactly what I wanted in the homework policy, being on that taskforce was a good experience for me and has led to other projects I’m working on now. See the film “Race to Nowhere.” The experience also helped me formulate more conclusions about homework. One of those is that homework is not the cause of, but rather a symptom of many problems in education.

Teachers often give homework because they say they don’t have enough time to complete everything during class time. If we changed the mindset from believing that we need to teach a set amount of information in a limited time, to focusing on individual needs and learning goals of each student, we would approach education differently.

Without pressures from above to fulfill state mandates and without pressures from administration to teach to a test, teachers would ideally be free to collectively and creatively decide how students learn best. This is no simple task, however, and it involves a shift in thinking about the principles of education that will then naturally lead to a change in practices of education.

The good news is that there are great teachers and schools doing this, successfully every day. Even a big, public school can learn from these smaller schools and teachers that have discovered how kids learn best. Learning is an organic process, not a linear one. We can’t fill up a kid’s head with knowledge, have him do his homework, take some tests, graduate and call it success.

We have to figure out what turns kids on to learning and how they learn before we can help them learn. In our new technological age of constant information, we have to shift from memorizing and regurgitating facts in school to making sense of all these readily-available facts by analyzing, synthesizing, creating, innovating and problem-solving. We have to move from teacher as expert, to teacher as facilitator. We need more student choice and voice. We also have to redefine success in this culture.

The truth is, I don’t actually mind if my kids have homework, AS LONG AS IT TURNS THEM ON TO LEARNING, and as long as it isn't just a spewing out of facts, and as long as it doesn’t consume their whole evening, weekend or holiday. But what I've observed over the last ten years is that their homework usually does TURN THEM OFF to the subject and it's usually a teacher-created exercise focusing on how well they follow directions rather than on how they synthesize and use information. I've only seen a few really inspired assignments through the years.

Sadly, what usually happens is this type of scenario: After doing a time-consuming English project last June, my older son said, “I’m so glad that’s done because now I don’t have to read another book until next year when school starts.” That was a perfect example of a homework assignment that killed the joy of learning (and reading!).

I hear comments like this from my kids much more often than I hear comments about how excited they are about what they are learning in school. The things that excite them in school are their friends, the extra-curriculars, and the precious few days without homework.

As I sit here typing, my son (who is doing his homework) just said "I hate school. But school wouldn't be that bad if we didn't have homework. Why do we have homework on the weekends?"

I rest my case.

Sunday, November 1, 2009

November 2009 Lesson Plans

You can easily tell that my favorite part of teaching is the preparation. I love planning out a month, figuring out what books, movies, experiments, cultural events, and other materials will allow us to richly delve into the topics for the month. This time I included book and movie titles in the lesson plan because it helped me to chart out what materials would be part of our specific area of study. Although I have not included reading on here, it is what I spend the most time on. We are studying long and short vowels, and practicing reading and writing by doing dictation, copying, sentence scrambles, fill in the blanks, bingo, and books. Here is what else is in store for the month of November:

Character theme of the month: Gratitude
• Reading stories of gratitude
• "The Book of Virtues”
• Let's be thankful / P.K. Hallinan.
• Thanks to you : wisdom from mother & child / Julie Andrews Edwards
• My book of thanks / B.G. Hennessy
• The secret of saying thanks / Douglas Wood
• Thanks & giving all year long [sound recording] / Marlo Thomas and Friend
• The most thankful thing / by Lisa McCourt
• Thanks for Thanksgiving / by Julie Marke
• The cool coats / written by Larry Dane Brimne
• The little red buckets / Lynda M. Nelson
• Henry’s Life as a Tulip Bulb – Linda Brandt
• Discussion on what gratitude is and when you have been grateful

• Community Service: Feeding the Homeless with food baskets

• Country of the month: Mexico
• Identifying Mexico on a map
• Cooking Mexican foods
• Field Trip: Mexican restaurant
• Mexican music
• Learning Spanish words and songs
• Day of the Dead – November 2nd
• Discussion: Who would you honor/Who do you miss?
• Crafts and Stories for Day of the Dead
• Mexico : a primary source cultural guide / Allan B. Cobb.
• Migrant farmworkers : hoping for a better life / Deborah Kent.
• The upside down boy / story by Juan Felipe Herrer
• The legend of Mexicatl / Jo Harper
• From here to there / Margery Cuyle
• Cristóbal and the witch; story by Jan Wah
• Under the lemon moon / by Edith Hope Fine
• Look what came from Mexico / by Miles Harvey.
• In Rosa's Mexico / by Campbell Geeslin

• Artists of the month: Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera
• Frida kahlo : an artist celebrates life Deborah Kent
• Frida Kahlo - DVD
• Diego Rivera : painting Mexico / Deborah Kent
• Diego Rivera : legendary Mexican painter / Laura Baskes Litwin.
• Making art like theirs
• Field Trip to the Denver Art Museum

• Mexican History – Cesar Chavez, Hernan Cortez, and Teotihuacan
• My diary from here to there / story, Amada Irma Pérez
• Cesar Chavez / by Ginger Wadsworth
• César : sí, se puede! = yes, we can! / Carmen T. Bernier-Grand
• Cesar Chavez [videorecording]
• Captain from Castile [videorecording] (Hernan Cortez)
• Hernán Cortés : the Conquest of Mexico and the Aztec Empire / Fred Ramen
• The travels of Hernán Cortes / by Debbie Crisfield
• 100 Hispanic Americans : who changed American history / Rick Laezman
• Teotihuacan : designing an ancient Mexican city: calculating perimeters and areas of squares and rectangles / Lynn George
• City of the gods : Mexico's ancient city of Teotihuacán / by Caroline Arnold

• Science - The human body
• Books
• You are weird : your body's peculiar parts and funny functions / Diane Swanson
• Immune system / Lorrie Klosterman
• Open me up / written by Laura Buller
• Lungs : your respiratory system / Seymour Simon
• The circulatory system / Christine Taylor-Butler
• The heart, lungs, and blood / Steve Parker
• The nervous system / Christine Taylor-Butler
• The brain and nervous system / Steve Parker
• My brain / Dana Meachen Rau
• The digestive system / Christine Taylor-Butler
• Sammy's day at the fair : the digestive system featuring gut feelings and reactions / Jerome Tiller
• The skeletal system/the muscular system.
• The skeleton and muscles / Steve Parker.
• Movies:
• Circulatory & respiratory systems [videorecording]
• How does your heart work? / by Don L. Curry
• The brain & the nervous system [videorecording].
• Digestive & excretory systems [videorecording].
• The bones of it [videorecording]
• Immune system [videorecording]
• Life's greatest miracle [videorecordingThe secret life of the brain [videorecording]Mysterious Human Heart
• Field Trips:
• Rocky Vista University for Doctor of Osteopathy (arrange for tour and possible participation/hands on event)
• University of Colorado Hospital tour
• Denver Museum of Science and Nature (Expedition Body)
• Science Experiments from the book Exploratopia (Part 1 – Eyes, Ears, Nose, Tongue, Hands & Brain)

• Math
• Addition, Subtraction, Skip Counting, Money, Time, Measurement, Multiplication/Times Tables
• Skip Counting Board
• Games like Bingo
• Bean counting
• Books:
• Breakthrough to Math workbook
• Math Through Children’s Literature
• It’s a Story that Counts
• Panda Math - Subtraction
• MathArts
• Quick and Easy Learning Games
• Math Play
• Janice VanCleave’s Play and Find Out About Math
• Math Practice
• Macaroni Math
• Cereal Math
• Exploratopia – Math expiriments
• Movies:
• Addition DVD
• Subtraction DVD
• Einstein’s Math
• EZ Math Trix Card Tricks
• EZ Math Trix Addition and Subtraction
• EZ Math Trix Number Fun
• CD-Rom
• Reader Rabbit’s Math
• Jump Start Study Helpers Math Booster
• Jump Start Learning Playground

• Thanksgiving
• Books on the origin of Thanksgiving
• The Thanksgiving bowl / by Virginia Kroll
• The Thanksgiving door / Debby AtwellCrafts:
• Thanksgiving Day : a time to be thankful / Elaine Landau.
• Thanksgiving / by Laura Alden
• This is the feast / by Diane Shore
• Celebrate the first Thanksgiving with Elaine Landau.
• Magic tree house. Books 25-29[sound recording] / Mary Pope Osborne (Thanksgiving on Thursday)
• Squanto and the first Thanksgiving / by Joyce K. Kesse
• Movies on Thanksgiving
• An old fashioned Thanksgiving [videorecording]
• Real heroes [videorecording] : inspirational stories of giving.
• Holiday facts & fun. Thanksgiving [videorecording]
• Stories for Thanksgiving [videorecording]
• Crafts
• Making bird/squirrel feeders out of Halloween pumpkins
• Turkeys out of hand prints
• Gratitude turkey feathers
• Making soap
• Cooking
• Pumpkin recipes
• Thanksgiving Dinner

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

An Education Emergency

Late night television recently aired a tape of a child who calls 911 for help while doing his math homework. Here is an excerpt of it:

Operator: 911 emergencies.
Boy: Yeah I need some help.
Operator: What’s the matter?
Boy: With my math.
.....
Operator: What kind of math do you have that you need help with?
Boy: I have take aways. 16 take away 8 is what?
Operator: You tell me. How much do you think it is?
Boy: I don’t know, 1?
Operator: No. How old are you?
Boy: I’m only 4.
Operator: 4!
Boy: Yeah.
Operator: What’s another problem, that was a tough one.
Boy: Um, oh here’s one. 5 take away 5.
Operator: 5 take away 5 and how much do you think that is?
Boy: 5.
Woman: Johnny what do you think you’re doing?!
Boy: The policeman is helping me with my math.
Woman: What did I tell you about going on the phone?
Boy: You said if I need help to call somebody.
Woman: I didn’t mean the police!

While this is funny, it is also pretty alarming to me. Even the Operator and the boy seem to realize that being "only 4" is really young for independently doing subtraction problems! You can see from his answers that this child is clearly not understanding such an abstract concept, yet he was expected to work on his own to do it.

In my neighborhood the first of the year's parent-teacher conferences are starting, and I have seen several requests for Kindergarten reading tutors through the neighborhood list serve. What is wrong with this picture? It is no coincidence that there are many Kindergartners who are having trouble reading - they are not typically developmentally ready for it! Back when a Kindergartner's day was determined by educators, it was about playing, socialization, art, singing, napping, and the introduction of letters, numbers, shapes and colors. Now Kindergartner's fate is set by politicians with no training necessary in child development, the "fun stuff" has been discarded so that there is more time to rush them to literacy and quadratic equations. There is something truly scary to me about a 4 or 5 year old getting that much pressure to be so serious. It doesn't seem all that different than putting them on a factory job at a young age. We, in this country, find that scenario appalling but too many seem to have no trouble robbing children of their brief time to be playful, joyful, and young.

Let me be clear: I am not saying that all parents who get tutors for their children are bad people. On the contrary! I think the problem lies with what we have allowed our schools to become. The ubiquity of Kindergarten literacy expectations, standardized testing, excessive homework battles,calls for longer and more days in school, etc. have caused parents (who want the best for their children) to conform to the pressure. We have been there. My older son had a tutor in first grade so that he could attempt to keep up with the rest of his class, where ability varied dramatically. We eventually stopped the madness. No more homework, no more tutoring, no more expectations above his abilities. Once we did that, Ronan regained his childhood, his confidence, his curiosity - himself. I truly regret that year, but we certainly all learned a lot (just not what was intended).

A friend recently shared a quote by Robert Kiyosaki. He said, "Our school system is based on the fear of failure not the love of learning, if that changes, when that changes, then we will have a more peaceful world cause we will develop more peaceful people." I completely agree, and when this does change, our children will have their childhood back and we will no longer be in a state of educational emergency. And, who knows, with the world at peace, maybe 911 operators would have no more calls about domestic violence, crime, or math problems, and could focus on health and accident-related calls!

A Nod to Jacqui Shumway

I am not a terribly political person, but when I did my research for this year's election of our local school board candidates I was impressed by one candidate in particular. She sounded like no one else, which both impressed and worried me. Jacqui Shumway is a teacher and parent who is running for Denver's District 4 Director because she believes that cutting art, music and physical fitness has resulted in a decline in graduation rates, academic achievement, and quality of children's mental and physical health. She believes that art, music, and physical fitness are not extras, but necessary to making an enjoyable learning environment. Hallelujah! She also wants teachers and principals to have greater autonomy and money in the classroom. She wants to put the joy back in learning. Hallelujah!

I am very much in favor of having real choice for schools and I support charter schools. In reading Ms. Shumway's webpage, she seems firmly in support of good neighborhood schools, saying that a child being driven across town to attend a school of choice is a child that is not playing, biking, or drawing. I agree, though I do want my choice of educational modalities! However, if schools looked more joyful, autonomous, and successful with her vision, I wouldn't mind going back to the neighborhood schools!

P.S. You would think I would not choose to turn to politics after my last foray on the heated subject of giftedness! I promise I am not looking to stir up controversy, rather I am making a rare political plug for someone I don't know who speaks my language!

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Recommended Reads - Mrs. Biddlebox and Mrs. Murphy

I love children's books that not only entertain but teach in a clever, memorable way. In early childhood, story telling is one of the most effective ways to teach many things, like values, math, history, social studies among others. There are two books on my kids' bookshelf that fit this category and have become family favorites.

"On a knotty little hill, in a dreary little funk, Mrs. Biddlebox rolled over on the wrong side of her bunk". And so begins a story about a woman in a grouchy mood having a bad day from the very start. She decides to turn the whole rotten morning into a cake, taking the lawn, the sun, the sky and baking it into submission. As she goes about the business of making this unique, from-scratch cake, the reader can see she is taking starting to feel some satisfaction in whipping her day into something better. By the end of the day her cake is done and she sits down to eat, at first taking a dainty slice, but eventually eating the whole thing. Her belly is full, she has changed her attitude, and the first contented smile appears on her face she heads to bed. The illustrations by Marla Frazee are as imaginative and fun as the story itself, bringing alive her fierce determination to actively welcome something better. My kids love the funny illustrations and the fantasy of taking a bad day and making into something really good. I like the book's message of empowerment and responsibility to meet the day with a positive attitude, no matter what happens. "Mrs. Biddlebox" is all the more poignant in that the author, Linda Smith was inspired to write the book as she battled cancer. Intended for four to eight year olds, the book is a real pleasure to read for us as well.

"Mrs. Murphy's Marvelous Mansion", by Emma Perry Roberts is written for the same age group and is about the peculiarly dressed Mrs. Murphy and her quirky little house. She lives on a cul-de-sac surrounded by large, vanilla houses remarkable only in their uniformity. The neighbors try to ignore the eccentric Mrs. Murphy and her odd house, until the Very Finest Neighborhood Contest brings out their neighborhood pride and intolerance. The neighbors let her know that she doesn't belong on their street. Mrs Murphy is surprised but invites them all over to her house for lunch so that they can see for themselves that her house is lovely too. Merely out of curiosity the neighbors accept her invitation. When they enter her tiny-seeming house, they are surprised at how spacious it seems and how beautiful it is. After the guests are shown around and each has commented appreciatively on some wonderful aspect of her house, they eat lunch together and there are smiles all around the table. As the neighbors are leaving one comments, "On the outside, her house is so much different than I expected." Another neighbor agrees that when they looked only at the outside, they couldn't appreciate the inside. Mrs. Murphy closes her door, thinking to herself that "it is a fine day indeed when we learn that beauty on the inside matters more than beauty on the outside." The old message of not judging a book by its cover is brought home in a powerful way that kids can really relate to. The illustrations by Robert Rogalski are as eccentric as Mrs. Murphy, with bold, rich colors and strangely beautiful rooms that give a sense of vast spaciousness and whimsy. The book's message of appreciating and looking for the goodness that is found on the inside makes for a lively discussion and a fun read.

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Schooled on Giftedness - An Apology, An Interview, An Alliance

A recent article I wrote on the subject of giftedness caused a rather heated discussion.  The end result of it (understanding and ideas) was very positive, but I wish to apologize all the same to many readers whom I might have offended.  While it did give a great springboard for discussion and learning, my attempt at humor at the beginning of the article obfuscated the message and I felt terrible that I had offended some without intention.  That humbling moment was not in vain, though.  I got to to talk to the fabulous Suki Wessling (after we both put down our dukes) and really enjoyed hearing her perspective.  Suki is a writer and homeschooler and knows a lot about the subject of giftedness.  We decided to do a written conversation on this so that others might understand this topic more.

Suki, you and I agreed that the term giftedness is a woefully inadequate descriptor.  I have never disputed that there are very advanced (gifted) children, but took aim at the lack of clarity and it revealed my general dislike for labels. You call it a different term.  Can you explain what it is and why it is better?

Parents and educators of "gifted" kids often bat around possible terms to replace gifted, which is such a loaded word because it implies a value judgment. As parents of gifted kids can tell you, parenting a gifted child can be very, very difficult, and their prospects for success are not any better, and sometimes worse, than other kids'. The term I prefer is borrowed from someone else: neuro-nontypical. A neuro-typical person is one who fits pretty easily into that nebulous region we call "typical" or "average" as far as their neurology goes (how they learn, behave, feel). A neuro-nontypical person is just different. Really, that term would include autistic people and Down's syndrome kids, and it's definitely not a value judgment. It's just an acknowledgement that when you're talking about educating a human being, a neurologically unusual child, whether learning disabled or "highly enabled," need a different approach.

Aside from the inadequacy of the term "gifted" why do you think there is such alienation and misunderstanding surrounding it?

A few reasons. One is that we live in a society that pretends to understand the value of intellect, but all indicators say that it doesn't value intellect in the least. Just look at our popular entertainment, our most revered public figures, and the relative salaries of intellectuals vs. non-intellectuals if you want proof.

Another reason is that parents are really feeling under the gun to help their children "succeed." We are bombarded with information that makes us anxious: Your child needs to know all his colors and numbers to get into the best preschool; your child needs to start reading in kindergarten to achieve testing goals; your child needs to be top in her class to get into the college you like. So when a parent says the word "gifted," imagine how loaded that is. "My child has a gift; your child is gonna have to work his butt off!" This is not true of most parents of neuro-nontypical kids, yet the word itself implies it.

When I went to the website called "Supporting Emotional Needs of the Gifted" (www.sengifted.org) I found a brochure on how to identify a gifted child.  I think that part of the problem in identifying giftedness is that is not very clear.  It includes characteristics like being very curious and observant, strong vocabulary and reasoning, pattern recognition, problem solving, and strong memory.  I realize that there is a matter of degree here, but it is understandable why so many people think there child is gifted.  What is gifted and what is it not?

It depends on the situation. Our public schools use certain measures for gifted programs, so some people would use those definitions. Psychologists who work with gifted children may use others. I think it's important to think of it similar to autism: parents of autistic kids often use the phrase "on the spectrum," meaning that a child is autistic, but is in his own unique place on the spectrum of the disorder. "Gifted" just means "good at something" in its most colloquial use. As a term for diagnosis, it's something you can certainly test: does the child learn in a different, faster way than typical children? Does she have any of the corresponding sensitivities and personality traits? Does he have special schooling needs because of the way he learns?

One reader used "smarter" as a synonym for gifted.  Does that mean smarter in every category?  If we just focused on the pure academics, does that mean a child is smarter in algebra, geometry, zoology, chemistry, writing, reading, geography, etc. or is it in a certain area?

This gets back to that "value judgment" aspect of the word. Frankly, a highly gifted person can be darn stupid in many ways. I remember a friend when I was at Stanford saying, "Why is it all these really smart women we know are so stupid about love?" What she was pointing out is that being good at test-taking, being articulate, good at analysis and dissection -- all those things that got us into Stanford -- have no relationship to good interpersonal skills, good hand-eye coordination, a good sense of humor, or any of the other many traits that we value in human beings.

Gifted people are usually not better at all academic subjects, and the more gifted (i.e. the more removed from the average set of learners out there) a person is, the less likely they seem to have average skills in a wide variety of areas. We all knew the math professor who forgot to wash his clothing, or the really smart 8th-grader who would get hit by balls on the head in P.E. because she was lost in thought, or the kid who hadn't learned to read but had diagrammed the entire New York City subway system inside his English textbook. These are examples of people whose brains were really good at some things, but were not able to function in situations that other people take for granted.

Most gifted people have wide areas of strength, though, so it is probably safe to say that a kid gifted in math would do well at everything that takes mathematical skills (including music, which is often tied to mathematical skills).

What about the Theory of Multiple Intelligences?  Beyond academic ability, what about musical, social, athletic, and other skills many of us are blessed with?

Some public school GATE programs take that into account, and include some non-academic areas of giftedness in their programs. The reality is, however, that academic giftedness is that one that causes problems for kids in school. All the other ones you mention are an asset to a student. Yes, a highly social, musical, or athletic child might not be doing great in academics because their passion is taking up so much time, but we don't really see that as so much of a problem. Does anyone know what Barry Bonds' high school grades were?

I think that the theory of multiple intelligences is a great way to integrate all children into a social group, and teach that we should value all children. However, I have seen at least one teacher use it to try to "put the smart kids in their place," which was very destructive. Multiple intelligences should not be used in a school setting to equalize, because we aren't all the same. It is our difference that makes us strong! We are the most highly varied species on the planet, and that is one of our greatest assets. We need to value all the skills that people have. Frankly, even the class clown who disrupts a test with farty sounds is an asset to a classroom, and teachers need to understand that and figure out how to work with it.

We talked a bit about IQ tests.  I don't feel they are a good measurement of a person's needs and abilities and have read a lot of Sir Ken Robinson's views on this subject.  He insists that IQ tests and scores are outdated, flawed, and changing.  Indeed the 100+ year history of the test has had it share of critics, including Alfred Binet, who pioneered the first intelligence scale.  Many critics point out that it is impossible to measure intelligence when we have not even defined it properly.  What are your thoughts on this?

My parents chose not to have their kids' IQ tested, and my husband I have chosen the same route. The number really doesn't matter to us, because we have found ways to create a positive learning environment for our kids: one of them is thriving in a public homeschool program; the other is thriving at a very socially positive and supportive private school.

The value that parents have found in the IQ test, as far as I have heard, is just that it sometimes can point out important things about how a child learns. Sometimes when trying to educate a child who seems ineducable, finding out that he has a top-of-the-charts IQ can help you understand how to reach him. Another value is that a child who has been pegged learning disabled in a school can be tested and be found to be profoundly gifted, which sometimes looks very similar to learning disabled, oddly enough. The number in that case is ammunition the parents can use to get their child the services she needs.

I don't see any value in IQ testing as a matter of course. It just seems weird to pin a number on people and then write them off. Rent the movie Gattaca!

Another point about IQ as it relates to determining giftedness is that the cut-off seems fairly arbitrary.  Who is to say that someone with an IQ of, say 129 is not gifted, but someone with one of 130 is?  It seems to me that the number does not change the fact that you still must meet the individual needs of each student.

Totally arbitrary. You suggested in your post that all kids need IEPs -- I agree with you. That is the beauty of homeschooling and smaller school programs: each child can be given what she needs and what inspires her. Once you get to large public schools, however, that cut-off is sometimes the difference between being stuck in a class that is going to drill the information for The Test yet again for the umpteenth time, and a class that's going to dissect frogs! That's when you get parents tearing their hair out trying to help their child "succeed." And that's when you get parents feeling like they're in battle with each other to get services for their kids. It's similar to the parents of kids in special education who feel they have to justify that their child has an aide when the classroom doesn't have enough money for crayons. If all students' needs were funded, I believe the cut-off would just be an arbitrary place for the school to start to say, "does this child have special needs that we haven't noticed?" Otherwise, yes, it is totally arbitrary and divisive.

In my original post I suggested that rather than focusing on our differences (high or low IQ, learning disabled or gifted) I thought it would be better to focus on meeting every kid right where he is (this was meant to be the main point).  I like the approach of each kid getting an IEP (Individualized Education Plan), which are typically given to struggling students.  Why not give each kid one?  Sure, it would not fit with the conventional model found in most schools and it does not do much for standardization, but the fact that we are talking about the challenges of giftedness doesn't speak much for the reality or goal of standardization.  In a Democratic School, students are given far more independence in their learning so that it meets their interests and needs, adding a level of maturity, responsibility, and customization to their education.  (See my post about a school in Denver that does this:
http://abettereducation.blogspot.com/2009/07/beautiful-marriage-of-opendemoc
ratic.html
).  What about offering more schools like this?


I'm all for it! I have spent my kids' school years trying to keep them in programs that suit them. Here in Santa Cruz County (California), we are blessed with a huge population of families who care about education, and thus a higher than average number of special programs, charter schools, private schools, and homeschooling options. As my children age, I start to see their former preschool classmates trickling into these special programs as parents realize their children's needs aren't being met.

My utopic vision of a public education system is this: Each county (or whatever geographic area makes sense in each location) would be one district. The schools would be small and fluid: Some kids would go to the same school every day. Some kids would only go to school certain days and learn independently other days. Some kids would go to different programs at different schools depending on their needs. Some kids would never go to school. All kids would be able to take part in the programs that they enjoy. Testing would happen just a couple of times, perhaps 3rd and 6th grade, just to make sure that nothing is being missed as far as the basic tools of modern life are concerned.

Unlike many homeschoolers, I do believe that there is a real reason for public education, and I do strongly believe that education needs to be compulsory. How you put together an education for a child, however, would be much more fluid than it is now, more focused on what "success" means for each student rather than what "success" means for administrators of a school district.

What are the alternatives for students who are not challenged enough in schools?

That depends on the location. Private schools can often offer more, but that is not necessarily the case. Parents should pay very close attention to the peer group at a private school to make sure it's the right fit for their child, since private schools tend to have a student population that is more narrowly focused and often their educational approach is very specific, such as Montessori.

Some public school GATE programs are run with the child in mind, and really do offer a more appropriate education within the public school system. Some, however, are just geared to pile on more busy work, faster, which doesn't serve most children, gifted or not.

Public charter schools and special programs can sometimes be a great fit for a student who needs more challenging work. It's important to note that "challenging" does NOT mean more busy work! Most kids whose brains function at a higher level tend not to be satisfied with yet another worksheet of math problems that they can do. Instead, they will excel if they are offered experiential programs that incorporate and expand their skills. Find out about local charter schools through your school district office or at http://www.uscharterschools.org/.

Homeschooling is a very good option for gifted kids who are extremely unusual learners or who have emotional/social difficulties. Homeschooling can happen within all sorts of different programs or outside of programs. In California, any family can set up their own private school and homeschool that way. If families want to be attached to a school, most districts have homeschool programs (either charter schools or special programs). We also have multi-locale charters that families can sign up with if there's no homeschool program near them. (Some of these take kids from a wide geographic area.) To learn more about homeschooling in California, visit the Homeschool Association of California - http://hsc.org/.

Describe the emotional issues of neuro-advanced students.

You mentioned http://sengifted.org -- I highly recommend that parents of gifted kids go there to get help. Neurologically different kids are usually not just different academically. Common issues that can show up in neuro-nontypical kids include high sensitivities, difficulties with social skills, asynchronous development, behaviors that resemble oppositional disorder, ADHD or bipolar, and more. Often these problems cannot be addressed sufficiently unless the whole child -- including his advanced intellect -- is considered as a package. A significant number of gifted kids are probably given unnecessary drug therapy when a change in learning environment or help with life skills might suffice.

Tracy, thank you so much for responding the way you did to criticism from parents of gifted kids. We need to learn from each other so that we can figure out how to make education better for all kids. I know that the tight budgets and balkanized educational theories make us all defensive, and I appreciate how you are doing your part to break down the barriers. -- Suki Wessling

To read more from Suki, check out her blog at http://sukiwessling.parentclickblog.com/

Sunday, October 18, 2009

Waldorf and Montessori - Fantasy Versus Reality



Many parents are familiar with the Waldorf and Montessori education models but not always clear on the differences between them. My children have been in both types of schools, so we had the pleasure of learning about both models in theory and in practice. I appreciate and respect many things about both modalities and I do understand that there can be a great deal of variation in many Waldorf and Montessori classrooms around the world.

Typically Montessori encourages a firm grounding in reality for a child and their materials help to cement that understanding. At the Montessori school my children attended, children were not to play with the manipulative materials in a way that is not in keeping with their purpose. For example, the math beads were to be used for counting in a certain sequential way when a child is ready to use them for math purposes. The classrooms emphasize order, with tidy workstations and plenty to do as a child chooses. While I do love the way Montessori encourages a child to learn through the use of manipulative materials instead instead of more abstract methods, I also appreciate the way Waldorf encourages fantasy play.

In a Waldorf classroom, play is considered a fundamental part of learning and fantasy is viewed as essential to creating happy and imaginative students. Waldorf teachers capitalize on the power of a story to teach children. The classrooms are beautiful and inviting. They are dreamy and colorful with found items from nature and plenty of gorgeous, natural fabrics draped to create a sense of space. In addition to creating the setting of the room, fabrics are also used to play make believe. Waldorf advocates for plenty of imaginative play and the teachers encourage it by providing natural toys made of wood or cotton that are minimally finished to encourage a strong sense of imagination. I love how the stories about Andy Add and Sammy Subtract help to bring alive an abstract idea.

In the Waldorf school we were a part of, there were plenty of stories on fairies. Children were told stories of fairies that mirrored their lives and helped them to make sense of their world and the world they cannot see. My children have built many a fairy house, using found objects in nature or a cardboard box. I love how it brings out the nurturing side of them (building a comfortable shelter for them) and their creativity. My children have written to their fairies and received answers and an occasional small gift from them. It is sort of like Christmas each time it happens, but it is not about the material item they get (a fortune cookie, a few coins, a figurine, some stickers) but the delight at the special connection and attention that they love.

In an eclectic education, the best of both can be used. I try to make use of manipulative materials and a story to make sense of an abstract concept. We do frequent nature walks, taking pictures of items that we will later use to learn. For example, we went on a photographic scavenger hunt this week, taking pictures of things that are brown, things that are dry, things that are soft, etc. to use for a sorting exercise later for my four year old. I am grateful that we can draw from the wisdom of both modalities to make our homeschooling experience all the richer.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

"All kids are gifted; some just open their packages earlier than others"

That great quote by Michael Carr brings to mind a story. One of my children got his first tooth quite early, compared to his peers. We knew he was dentally gifted. We made sure he tested into the top dentists, we surrounded him with other dentally precocious children, and we gave him a special diet that would encourage his gift to grow further and faster. I also got a bumper sticker for my car to advertise his advanced toothiness.

All right, that's not true, but it is what I think of on the topic of giftedness. Any time someone talks about their child being gifted, I want to ask them "in what area is your child an early learner?" Giftedness is such an inadequate and highly charged word. It seems to imply that a certain group of children are blessed with an all-encompassing, ever-advanced intelligence while the rest of the population is hopelessly average or worse.

Some kids learn to read quite quickly but have no aptitude for math. Others are great at understanding patterns, but are verbally behind their peers. I know many little boys who have an early propensity for dinosaurs - they know the names and habits of every dinosaur known to man, yet they are socially or physically awkward. The term giftedness does not adequately describe a child's singular area of proficiency, but instead tends to confer a blanket of superiority around the child, leaving others in the cold.

Does early achievement really mean permanent giftedness? Well, what if you do have a child who is an early reader? By, say, 6th Grade, does that child actually read any better than the child who learned to read a year or two later? At age 10, can you tell which child learned to talk or walk earlier than the others? Just like those that are dentally gifted, a head start in a particular area of growth and development does not necessarily make for an enduring advantage. By the same token, a delayed start does not equate to mental inferiority. Albert Einstein is a great example of that. Not only would he not have been in the Highly Gifted and Talented Program as a young student, he would likely have had an Individual Education Plan (IEP) to help him up to average.

And what about the theory of multiple intelligences? Does giftedness take into account a particularly athletic girl if she horrible at algebra? Does giftedness include the musically talented boy who is an awful speller and grammatically delayed? Is a child with advanced social skills less gifted than a child who can read a Harry Potter book at age seven?

It is natural for parents to notice and take pride in each of the developmental milestones our children achieve. We are supposed to marvel at them and cheer them on, but we should stop short at pressuring them too hard or setting them on a pedestal above others. I overheard a woman talking to the head of our pre-school as she complained how hard the Highly Gifted and Talented test was. She had had her son take the test three times and he failed to qualify each time. I have to believe that is damaging to the child in some way. Why is it so important to her to have the title of giftedness for her child?

It is the job of every parent and educator to recognize the strengths that lie in every child and to facilitate further development in those areas. How would it be if we honored all learning differences in every subject, whether they were advanced or delayed, kinesthetic or auditory, etc.? All children should have an IEP custom-made according to their strengths and learning styles! What if we treated all children as gifted and we optimized the education of each child according to his specific gifts? Our schools and communities would be stronger if we were to recognize and grow the gifts that each child possesses to everyone's benefit.

Just like on their birthdays, I look forward to seeing what gifts my children got and how they will use them!

Sunday, October 11, 2009

In Praise of BaLaNcE


Ronan got his first bike with training wheels on his third birthday, though he didn't want anything to do with it for a few months. Eventually he rode around on it until he had a minor biking accident that hurt and scared him and he stopped riding it again for awhile. Over the course of almost four more years we tried a few times to take the training wheels off so that he could ride a big boy bike but each time he requested that the training wheels be put back on. He wasn't ready. One day, we took off the training wheels, the crank and the pedals and made our own balance/push bike. He tried this out for a couple of weeks, getting the hang of balancing his body to keep the bike upright. On the last day of school when he was almost seven, I took him to a consignment bike store to pick out a bike that was appropriate for his size in anticipation that this would be the summer he would be ready to ride a big boy bike. He picked out one he liked and took it for a test drive and I let go. He took off, riding off down the sidewalk as if he had been riding without training wheels for months! We were both so thrilled!

Although he had a year of pedaling practice with a big wheel, we decided to start Jude off with a balance bike, which he got for his fourth birthday. Just like Ronan, he wouldn't touch it for a few weeks. Then he started riding it cautiously, and within a week he was not only balancing, but even doing tricks on a moving bike. Within a month he asked to try a big boy bike with pedals and without training wheels. On his very first try he rode off down the driveway like a seasoned rider. Again, parent and child were thrilled!

Given the popularity of balance bikes, we are not the only ones who have found that they are great for learning to ride a bike. I think that the balance bikes are a great metaphor for education. Just like on a bike, each kid learns at his own natural pace and what makes him ready is not the external work, but something from within.

A child will learn to read not so much by constant effort and badgering by another person, but by being ready and willing on a timeline that is natural and unique to each person. True, it does take effort, and practice, and plenty of opportunity to learn both bike riding and reading, but neither can be rushed. Both will happen when there is a sense of balance, confidence, and willingness - the internal pieces that must be in place for the independence on bikes or books to occur.

In education, a child that is pressured to read through nearly constant practice and tutoring has no balance. Academic balance comes from not only exposure to literacy, but to other important aspects of humanity, like nature, art, science, math, socializing, history, play, etc. Through the exploration of all of the interesting aspects that make us human we achieve a vital sense of balance that enables us to grow in each area. Not only is a maniacal focus on ever earlier literacy unnecessary and developmentally inappropriate, it also robs us of the opportunity to understand and explore other subjects. At a young age, breadth is what allows us to understand our world. This foundation gives us balance and the ability to grow. It allows us to achieve not only literacy but a strong foundation of knowledge in any other subject.

Balance and biking and literacy will all come if we act as facilitators for them to naturally unfold at their own rate with enthusiasm, encouragement, respect, understanding, and patience. Then, look out! They will take off with joy and confidence to fuel them forward!

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Slowing Down

One of the greatest gifts and the hardest thing to adjust to homeschooling is the pace of life. People in my office used to hear me coming by the sound of my hasty footsteps approaching them. I used to drive over the speed limit even if I was going to be early. I love to get things done and I have often stacked a lot on my plate just to savor the goofy happiness of crossing it off my to-do list. Homeschooling has a way of slowing you down and redefining efficiency. It has a way of forcing you into being in the now and being present.

I am always planning things. I've planned pregnancies, fundraising events, social engagements, and now lesson plans. I even plan great vacations and then don't always enjoy them to the fullest because the planning stage is over and I don't know what to do with just relaxing. But I've noticed that homeschooling requires a lot of attention and executing on the plans, with little time for more planning. I have learned pretty quickly that I need to keep the momentum going with the schoolwork, or I lose my kids to chaos and play. I have to give them my complete attention for everything to go smoothly. On days where I succumb to looking up one more book on the library website, or looking through an anthology for just the right story, it does not pay!

I have also come to understand that getting things done is not going to feel like it used to. I used to get through a whole day's worth of work-related tasks, not to mention picking up children in two different schools, cooking dinner, cleaning up (well, sometimes), and getting everyone ready for bed. Now, an errand or two can eat up the entire day and leave me feeling panicked that not enough learning took place. Even on days when we do not leave the house, I have the notion we will get through reading, writing, math, time-telling, calendar work, geography, Spanish, sociology, art, music and cooking with plenty of time for play and lunch. I have yet to have a day where we worked all of that in! However, I have come to the pragmatic realization that, like nutrition, it is what you do over the course of the week that counts. Getting everything done every day is not practical or possible, so I am learning to relax about it and shoot for the larger goal over the course of a week or the month.

Jude, who learned how to ride a bike with no training wheels and no assistance recently, asked if we could ride bikes to the zoo instead of drive as I had planned. It's only about three and a half miles from our house, so I agreed. I knew it would be a slower ride than I am used to, but this was the kind of ride that was actually difficult for me to stay upright due to lack of momentum. A person with 12" bike rims has to pedal a lot more to move than a person on an adult's bike, but we made it to the zoo without any complaints. On our bike ride we noticed tree houses, birdhouses, dogs, gardens, leaves, and puddles. (Here's a tip: although drafting works well for Lance Armstrong, it is not a great idea to draft a four year old!) I would not have noticed any of these had I been driving or riding at my own speedy pace, in a hurry for no reason. Not only did we appreciate all of the sights and sounds along the way, it was so gratifying to see the obvious pride on Jude's face, having completed his first impressive bike ride and keeping up with the rest of us. That was definitely worth being present for!

Monday, October 5, 2009

Homeschooling Doubters, Here is Some Impressive Data

It is not unusual to encounter those that doubt the whole idea of homeschooling. Many think that all homeschoolers will be churning out a generation of socially graceless, academically primitive, brainwashed young adults who are destined for a life of wierdness, failure, and poverty. Sometimes these prejudices are even in one's family. There are some in our larger family who have voiced their concerns for my children's future. One of them pointed out that each generation in our family has done better than the subsequent one and we are responsible for making our children better off than we are.

My husband and I want a lot of things for our children. We want our kids to be happy, confident, well-adjusted, resilient, adaptive, curious, creative, wise, compassionate, kind.... We also want them to be comfortable in life doing what they love to do. Neither of us have any preconceived notion about how much money they should make and what profession they should be in. If I look back on three generations in both of our families, I see that they all managed to live relatively comfortably. Yes, each generation did better financially than the next, but how much money do we need to aim for? How much more comfortable do they need to be? I don't think that is up to us. Our job is to educate them: academically, financially, morally, spiritually, politically, socially.... They get to decide what it is they will be when they grow up and how much money they will make.

Lest you think that all my efforts are dooming my children to (gasp!) an obscure community college and a life of mediocrity, check out the the Homeschool Legal Defense Association's website http://www.hslda.org/docs/news/200908100.asp The webpage features an article by Ian Slatter called "New Nationwide study Confirms Homeschool Academic Achievement", which mentions an extensive University of Maryland study on homeschooled students and 15 other independent testing services. The highlights are:

- On the California Achievement Test, the Iowa Test of Basic Skills, and the Stanford Achievement Test, homeschoolers outscored their public school peers by between 34 and 39 percentage points in every category.

- Each year there are 100,000 homeschool graduates, increasing 7% a year

- There was little difference between the results of homeschooled boys and girls on scores, while girl's seem to out-perform boys in institutional school settings. Homeschooling seems to level the playing field

- There was surprisingly little impact of household income on test scores, which is quite different from public school demographics.

- While the education level of the parents made a difference in the student's test scores, even those of non-college educated parents score in the 83rd percentile, which is well above the national average.

- Also making no impact on the test scores were whether the parent was ever a certified teacher, how much money was spent on home education, and how much government regulates homeschooling in the student's state.

This shows quantitatively that homeschooling can be the great equalizer across genders, economic and education levels. But not only does it equalize, it also shows that it significantly increases academic performance for a fraction of the money spent in public schools. The data shows that I am not dooming my children, but rather, I am giving them a tremendous boost. How much money they make is up to them after my work is done!

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

What's in Store for October!

When I got started this week in earnest with my kids, I did a lot of reviewing. Although I believe in the Waldorf philosophy of teaching kids to read in a much more gradual, art-based way than a conventional school does, I noticed that my first reaction was to cram and drill on letters and numbers! Instead of my goal of making this gradual, meaningful, and enjoyable, I panicked and thought, "he has to learn to read now!" I quickly came to my senses, but that was a valuable exercise in compassion for all of the pressured teachers out there in public school who feel they MUST get a kid to read to meet a certain standard or score for literacy and numeracy.

During my Michigan visit, I met with Pat Montgomery, who opened the first alternative school in Michigan – a school my husband attended. We talked all about education and one thing she said to me stood out: “You can’t teach a kid to read.” I think I feel more comfortable appending that with “until he is ready.” I think you can do all sorts of things to prepare them for literacy, like reading to them, having them copy and trace letters, sounding out phonetic words, identifying letters and beginning sounds, etc. However, none of this will matter until the child is ready to read. Waldorf schools do fantastic job of making that a natural, creative process that seems more like creativity or story telling.

So I slowed down a bit today and we reviewed more and did more creative, fun lessons, beyond literacy. I have planned each month in advance to include each discipline of reading, writing, math, science, geography, social studies, art and cooking. For example, here is what October looks like:

Character theme of the month: Compassion
- Reading stories of compassion from Buddha at Bedtime and "The Book of Virtues”
- Introduction to Mother Teresa (books and movie)
- Other movies on compassion, including “Mask” (the one with Cher, not Jim Carrey)
- Field Trip: theatrical production of “The Ugly Duckling”
- Discussion on what compassion is and when you have been compassionate
Artist of the month: Picasso
- Movies and books on Picasso
- Making art like Picasso
- Field Trip to the Denver Art Museum
Country of the month: Spain
- Identifying Spain on a map
- Movies and books on Spain
- Cooking Spanish foods
- Field Trip: Spanish restaurant
- Field Trip: Flamenco music and dance
- Learning Spanish words and songs
- Field Trip: Colorado Ballet – Don Quixote (along with stories and movies on that subject in preparation)
Columbus Day
- Movies and books on the holiday and the man
- Discussion of perspectives (why some people don’t like the celebration)
Science
- Bird Migration
• Books about various bird migration patterns
• The movies “Winged Migration” and “Fly Away Home”
• Craft: Build and decorate a bird feeder
• Identifying birds
- The science of flotation, including experiments in what floats, what doesn’t and why.
Halloween
- Books and movies on the origin of Halloween (and some just for fun!)
- Crafts: Shriveled Apple Faces, Egg Carton Spiders, pumpkin carving, leaf pressings, etc.
Cooking
- Apple plumps
- Apple sauce
- Canning the rest of summer’s bounty (including a wee bit on the science of canning, and how it keeps bacteria at bay)

With all of that AND reading, writing, math, piano lessons, and playing, we will have a very enjoyable, busy month ahead of us!

Project Zero - An Interview with Larry Scripp

Larry Scripp, Ed.D is a musician, educator, research, program developer, and administrator. He is the Chair of the Music Education department (and its Music-In-Education program) at New England Conservatory. As Founding Director of Center for Music-In-Education, he designs and implements Music Plus Music Integration programs in public schools through a coalition of schools of music and education, arts organizations, and school reform organizations through the arts. I first was introduced to Larry when I had researched Project Zero, which he was kind enough to explain to me.

Larry, first please tell us, what is Project Zero?

Project Zero is an educational research group at Harvard’s Graduate School of Education. Its mission is to understand the relationship of human development in the arts, and to find ways to enhance learning, thinking, and creativity in the arts, as well as humanistic and scientific disciplines, at the individual and institutional levels. I believe that the name Project Zero was used because Nelson Goodman, its founder, felt that there was zero literature to start with in the field of normal human development and in the arts, and he set out to create such a literature along with his graduate students at that time, David Perkins and Howard Gardner

I understand there are many different research projects under the Project Zero umbrella. What areas of research were you involved in during your 10 years of work with this group?

I was involved in the Music and Early Symbolization Project, Arts PROPEL arts assessment in Pittsburgh Public Schools, Lincoln Center Institute Study, and a Music Technology and Composition Project. In the early days it was all about research guided by Piagetian frameworks, but in the 80s it began to focus on applied research, working directly with schools. Arts PROPEL is an acronym for essential components of artistic knowing - Perception, Reflection and Production - and it was the framework for organizating assessment practices in creative writing, visual and musical arts. The project was involved with setting standards of teaching, documenting frameworks from developmental stages, and creating devices and instruments in schools. This project developed new standards for the documentation, organization and assessment of student learning in the arts in public schools. We created prototypes for what are now considered common practice portfolio assessment methods. We didn’t just go into schools to test our own ideas, but worked with the teachers and talked about assessments in the arts and how to do it. This was a collaboration with Pittsburgh Public School District to develop authentic assessments that could be implemented in both general music classrooms and ensemble rehearsal studios.


Broadly speaking, what conclusions have you reached in your research about the arts in education?

I have reached the conclusion that although art forms are very different, each contributes an essential medium of learning and provides a model for learning in other disciplines; that multiple intelligence theory (penned by Howard Gardner), though valuable in its day, has now evolved to acknowledge the complexity of factors involved in artistic intelligences and their possible integration across domains. I have come to realize that the younger generation of music educators now acknowledge that authentic arts learning depends on the integration of other forms of intelligences.

In the Music-in-Education National Consortium – a group that I founded to explore learning both in and through music - we now believe in the creative tension between ‘differentiation and synthesis,” that is, the paradoxical notion that learning in the arts depends on knowledge of other domains of knowing, and that the productive integration of artistic knowing with other subject areas requires deep knowledge in each separate domain. Cognitive skills, intelligence in schools and in life develop in the constantly changing stages of dis-equilibrium between differentiation and synthesis of knowing in and across other disciplines. For example, there are certain parts of the brain where auditory abilities and linguistic abilities share neural networks, yet function within “separate” cognitive domains. Schools are still behind in recognizing this, but they are starting to come to that realization when music and music-integrated instruction takes root in both musical and academic studies.

How has this work helped communities and schools improve and enrich education?

By advocating arts learning in separate domains as a necessity for human development that enhances general education and whole school improvement. It has helped advocate for the arts and connect arts to cognitive skills. Those that learn music realize that there is a certain inextricable sense of cognitive interrelatedness and that the complexity of this interrelatedness grows as you learn and master music learning processes. With this interrelatedness and complexity comes a increasingly powerful musical imagination, critical thought and analytic perspectives that result in a greater sense of intentionality in the creative process. Cognitive-rich creativity is learned in the domain in the context of each art form; it is not a thing to itself. What we are now learning now is that integrated learning processes foster an understanding of parallel problem-finding and problem-solving skills that appear to result in a deeper and broader range of cognition embedded in this synthesis of interdisciplinary work.

Part of Project Zero’s mission is to foster critical and creative thinking through the arts. How does Project Zero and/or education through the arts accomplish this goal?

Mainly to demonstrate assessment of arts learning in relation to cognitive skills, and see that creativity is intrinsic to authentic, comprehensive arts learning. If we look at creative aspects of the arts and the cognitive skills involved in critical and creative thinking, we see something intrinsic to arts learning at every juncture of its developmental progression. Paying attention to the discipline of the art form is really important. Learning takes place both through and within the arts. It is important to learn the arts for its own sake but also to pay attention to the impact of arts learning across domains. Those who study music are more apt to understand proportion and balance differently than in other art forms. The arts can teach a different way of looking at things and a deeper understanding shared between disciplines. It is a particularly engaging way of learning. Arts learning and teaching is not a uniform phenomenon in formal education. How it is taught and supported makes a big difference. We need to get away from anachronistic views of talent (choosing only the very best and grooming them) to a policy that allows access and equal opportunity for arts learning to occur in unexpected ways across a wide set of problems and disciplines.

As Piaget says, to invent is to understand, and creativity informed by critical thinking is the hallmark of music cognitive development. I take that to heart in all my work in education. Creativity is not an ideal moment or special occasion; rather it is a staple of all kinds of problem solving situations. Ken Robinson talks about creativity as applied imagination, which is creativity to solve problems through imaginative thinking. We need to keep these concepts in play and we need to find ways to assess the potency of these skills in all learners.. With good arts-rich educational policy our schools will contribute a much healthier source of creativity to our society.

How do you foster collaborative relationships with schools, universities, museums and other institutions to improve education?

With Project Zero it was at first through assessment in individual art forms. I left Project Zero in order to pursue research in music learning in school networks. I started the Conservatory Lab Charter School as a major experiment in music and music integrated learning in 1998. Although this small school failed to achieve the promise of its charter on its own, the research findings that began with this project have since resulted in twelve years of federal funding for the creation of the Music-in-Education National Consortium and its Learning Laboratory School Network. If have tried to apply the Project Zero concepts of meaningful, authentic research, assessment, documentation, and assessments in my work to advance education today.

In your estimation what does an ideal learning setting look like in a K-12th grade setting?

It is an arts-rich, project and portfolio based, and a longitudinally assessed program within a school learning community. It is a setting where active, research-based professional learning and leadership modeled on music and music integration program development are valued. This productivity is constructive for both teachers and students. Engagement is a two way street with peer learning, group learning, visual learning, and the full diversity of process that includes music and arts integrated practices.. There should be plenty of expressivity, media, and materials as well as objects worthy of study. Education should be project and portfolio based. Students’ work should be about generating new knowledge based on a deep understanding of fundamental concepts that can be learned in the context of interdisciplinary cognition. The recitation of isolated facts is not necessarily indicative of a good learning environment; facts take on new significance when a curriculum of worthy objects of study is investigated on a deeply personal, yet rich informed basis. Even arts learning works best when it fosters an ethos of a school as a learning organization that constantly focuses on the optimal balance of creativity and imagination, inquiry and reflection, and performance and understanding.

I see that you are currently involved with the Music-in-Education National Consortium that furthers your work of integrating music in public schools. Can you tell me about this organization and your efforts there?

I have a personal focus on music as a medium and model for learning in other arts, academics, and social-emotional development. MIENC was created to use arts partnerships to bring programs and research into schools and the MIENC Learning Laboratory School Network, guided by 10 principles of school improvement, was created to investigate music based program development and its impact on schools. The organization publishes journals to make practices and research visible, and actionable in school networks (see journal.music-in-education.org and develops longitudinal assessments of music literacy learning in schools among other programs.

For more information on Project Zero, go to http://www.pz.harvard.edu/index.cfm
For more information on Music-In-Education National Consortium, go to http://www.music-in-education.org/

Monday, September 28, 2009

The First "Real" Day of Homeschooling

Today was the first day we did the home-bound version of homeschooling. It was a very busy day, though I didn't help matters any by choosing the activities the way I did. In addition to the school work, I also did laundry, made two dinners (one to share for a friend who just had a baby), general tidying, and painting a wall in the living room. OK, so I am driven! I am hoping that days with only one dinner and no painting projects feel less rushed.

I set up the spare bedroom with a desk, maps of the United States and the world, and a bookshelf with all sorts of materials to read and write with. We three sat on the bed and I had my four year old, Jude doing a workbook that had him identifying which thing belongs and which doesn't, matching, counting, and shapes. On the other side of me was Ronan (eight). We did letter identification, reading, and writing. We also did number identification telling time, and writing of numbers. He has done adding, subtracting, multiplication and division already, but I wanted to start at the beginning to review, build confidence, and to see if there were any problems at the basic level before moving on, which turned out to be a good idea.

This method of sitting with both kids at the same time presented its challenges and rewards. The challenges included the fact that it fragmented my attention, having to attend to each kid when they wanted my help. The other challenge was the each kid got a little distracted by what the other one was doing, but that was pretty minor. The rewards were that I could keep an eye on both kids at the same time and be right there to help or identify problems. If I let Jude run loose while I am with Ronan he tends to find more destructive ways to get my attention! It IS challenging to handle more than one kid at a time.

In addition to the those studies we read a story about Ramadan, which recently ended, and Yom Kippur, which was today. We also read a few stories that deal with courage, which is our character theme of the month, which included a story on David and Goliath. I didn't intend to give my kids a tour of major religions of the wold, it just worked out that way. We ended the day with an art project. and the kids were free to go play with the neighbors who were just getting home from their schools.

As far as goals for myself, I managed to do OK. I took the time to meditate this morning, setting the pace and intention for the whole day. I did my little service project of feeding a family other than my own. I kept the house in reasonably good shape and even added some color to it. I did take a shower, which is a sign of a good day. Who cares if I didn't do it until 4:30! I am also on my way out for Girls' Night out with a friend to see a movie that is not rated G. So I get fairly high marks in efficiency, creativity, spirituality, cleanliness, and patience. I got an F in physical movement though. Perhaps tomorrow when I put away the painting and getting myself outside for some fresh air and exercise. Not bad for the first day of the Homeschool year!

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Lessons Learned

I am HOME! We arrived last night around 6:00 to a spotlessly shiny house and a homemade dinner that included champaign and flowers on the table. After one month, many adventures and more than 4000 miles of driving, we were thrilled to see John and sleep in our own beds. The next few days will be devoted to getting things back in order, which I relish. It is the physical work that matches my mental/emotional state!

Here are a few things I learned over the course of this journey:

• A little bit of absence can recreate a relationship. It can restore the appreciation, attention, and affection that can sometimes get lost when we are consumed with the "mundaneity" of life, like jobs, child-rearing and the like.

• If you value things more than you value people, you will be really stressed out about your stuff getting ruined all the time and miss out on the really important relationships right before you. When you are old, sick, or lonely your stuff won’t be as much comfort to you as the relationships could have.

• Chicago drivers could use decaf, Xanax, and mandatory grace and courtesy classes. Merging is not the same thing as taking cuts, folks!

• Kangaroos are fascinating, especially how the incredibly tiny babies have to find their own way to the pouch after being born. It’s amazing they are as prolific as they are.

• Spending a lot of time with my kids in an unfamiliar setting promoted a lot of bonding and affection. We truly enjoyed the company and comfort of each other, even with the normal rough spots. I have never felt closer to my kids than now.

• When I am feeling negative in any way, it helps to name how I am feeling out loud. Somehow that dissipates the feelings.

• The really fun parts of our trip were the less scripted ones, and also the much cheaper adventures. Playing at the beach, hunting for frogs and crayfish, roasting marshmallows on the campfire, or picking our own apples were more memorable and special than all of the museums. Outside fun almost always trumps inside fun.

• As long as there are books around, there are abundant opportunities for learning and engagement. High praise for libraries everywhere.

• The lives of frogs are fascinating.

• Receiving graciously can be much harder for people than being generous.

• An evening with my best friend makes the world a better place. Shared laughter and understanding would solve most of the world problems. It certainly works for mine!

• Incessant complaining is sharing negativity. Ask yourself if others really want that negativity. No thanks, I’m good.

• The science behind what causes a ball to bounce is incredibly interesting. And fun.


-

Monday, September 21, 2009

On the Way

Despite wanting to be home already, we thoroughly enjoyed our visit at the cottage in Caseville with my old college roommate. There is nothing like sand, sun, and water to renew you! We loved the food and conversation as well.

We have already started our descent on Denver. The first leg began yesterday when we arrived in Chicago for one more visit with our cousins. We went to a fantastic Arboretum today and learned all about nests of various critters and birds, which they loved.

I can't wait to start the drive tomorrow and am even tempted to drive the whole 14+ hours in one day, despite my noble intentions. I will probably stop it at 7-1/2 around Omaha, but I like the flexibility that driving gives me (though to be fair, what flying lacks in flexibility, control and expense, it makes up for in speed!).

The next post will be from HOME, where I hear it is snowing today.

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Gaining a sense of appreciation of home and family (read: homesick)!

“The more one does and sees and feels, the more one is able to do, and the more genuine may be one's appreciation of fundamental things like home, and love, and understanding companionship.” - Amelia Earhart (1897-1937), aviator, author

We have seen and done a lot over the last three and a half weeks and I can tell you just how much we are appreciating home, love and understanding companionship right now! This time has gone by so fast and I am glad we have done this epic trip filled with adventures and experiences, but we are feeling homesick and ready to return. Everyone is missing Daddy and our own sense of place. Today was the last day at homebase in Michigan at my parent's house. Tomorrow we head up north to my old college roomate's cottage on Lake Huron for the long weekend. It will be fun to play in the sand and visit old friends for one last relaxing bit of fun before we begin the journey home on Sunday. I was actually excited to pack up this evening!

During the last week we visited a Cider Mill, a couple of petting zoos, went geo-caching, and visited with friends. We studied Amelia Earhart, Johnny Appleseed, apple trees (we were most impressed with the Greeks who came up with grafting that give us the apples we have come to know and love), marsupials, and amphibians. Math was done with bead work (counting and sorting) and we did some science experiments involving polymers and energy, which was really cool.

I am glad we are experiencing a Michigan fall. The leaves are just now starting to change - something we always have missed with a school schedule. The weather was tending toward autumn today too. It seems that we are in synch with this season as we too are starting to wind down from the high energy of summer. We are ready to get home, turn our attention more inward, and get a little more serious about school work and routine. After such a long trip it will be a welcome change!

Sunday, September 13, 2009

A Revolution in School Cafeterias

Revolution Foods is making its mark in school cafeterias across the country. School lunches have had a well-earned, legendary reputation for barely being edible and barely resembling actual food. Revolution Foods is changing the way our schools do hot lunches, by making them tasty, nutritious, and easy.

How did Revolution Foods begin?

Revolution Foods began with a founding team who believed that all students should have access to healthy, fresh food and nutrition education on a daily basis. Co-founders Kristin Richmond http://www.revfoods.com/browse/board_of_directors and Kirsten Tobey http://www.revfoods.com/browse/board_of_directors met at the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley and shared a vision of creating a social venture that would make their idea a daily reality for schools nationwide. It didn’t hurt that they both loved great food as well!


Having a background in education themselves, Kristen and Kirsten knew that in order for this venture to be successful they needed to reach out those that matter most: the school communities that they would serve, interviewing teachers, students, families and school leaders from over 40 Bay Area schools. They built a key partnership with Whole Foods who believed in their mission of getting as much fresh, healthy food as they could to as many students as possible. Prior to launching they also had the incredible fortune to meet their first hire, Executive Chef and partner extraordinaire, Amy Klein.

Driven by passion and supported by their families, friends and greater Bay Area community, Kristin and Kirsten launched Revolution Foods in the Summer of 2006.

How are your lunches better than the standard hot lunches found in schools across the country?

Revolution Foods prides itself on its high food quality standards, and this is one piece of what makes our meals and our lunch program unique. We also have a comprehensive nutrition education program. In terms of food standards, our partnership with Whole Foods helps us gain access to the highest quality ingredients available, that we can then use to create meals that are student favorites. Here’s a little bit about our lunches:
• Every lunch is served with fresh fruit and vegetables
• Our meats, baked goods and produce meet Whole Foods Market’s stringent quality standards
• Our milk is rBST- and hormone-free and our meats are hormone- and antibiotic-free
• Our food is prepared fresh daily; we do not serve fried or overly processed food
• Our meals do not contain high-fructose corn syrup or trans fat
• We use organic and locally produced ingredients whenever possible

We highly value the input from our students, school partners, administrators, and parents. Each school site has a dedicated School Account Manager who visits regularly, eats lunch with students, and gathers their feedback about the lunches. The relationships that School Account Managers build with students and schools are a unique component of our lunch program.

How many schools do you serve?

Revolution Foods serves over 120 schools and programs in the California, and has recently launched in Denver and Washington D.C., totaling over 160 schools throughout the United States.

What kinds of foods do you offer?

We offer a wide range of menu options. A few sample Revolution Foods menus include:
• All Natural Grilled Chicken with Homemade Teriyaki Sauce and Sesame Stir-Fried Bok Choy, Red Peppers and Carrots served atop a Fresh Noodle Nest, served with a Clementine orange
• All Natural Honey Glazed Chicken served with Roasted New Potatoes and Collard Greens served with a local peach.

Other popular items include Handmade Chicken Tamales, All Natural Spaghetti and Meatballs, Chicken Caesar Salad, and All Natural Hamburger with Organic Cheese on a Whole Wheat Bun. All meals are served with fresh fruit and vegetables and a carton of all natural, hormone free, rBST free low fat milk. Many of our most popular items came from student suggestions.

I see you have a program for packed lunches too. What do you offer those students?

In addition to our home style, fresh meal platform for schools, we have a delicious retail line of 100% organic snack foods sold in Whole Foods Market, Toys r Us, Babies r Us, HEB, Amazon.com, Drugstore.com and more. A percentage of the revenues of this line are used to fund our healthy meal program in low income schools.

How do you balance nutrition with good taste?

We have always started with high quality, fresh, all natural ingredients and used feedback from our school communities to craft our menus. This student focused menu design coupled with the fact that we adhere to stringent food standards and our meals meet the USDA recommended portion sizes and nutritional guidelines for the age groups we serve helps us accomplish our mission of balancing nutrition with good taste.

How do you educate parents, students and school staff on nutrition?

Another integral part of our lunch program is nutrition education. We believe it is important to inform students, families, and schools on how to make healthy choices both inside and outside of the lunchroom. We provide students, schools and parents with written materials as well as lessons and activities at school sites that focus on nutrition and healthy eating.

Because you cook the foods made daily in your own kitchen, how can this save a school district or organization in the long run? Do they save on kitchen costs?

This healthy meal program is ideal for schools that do not have the facilities or infrastructure to prepare fresh, home style meals. We custom design a plan for schools and districts that makes sense for them based on their vision for a health and wellness platform and the resources they currently have in house.

Do you serve the elderly community and other organizations beyond schools?

Although we primarily serve schools, we also serve summer camps, after school programs, recreational centers and non-profit organizations. We are able to touch even more organizations through our catering services.

How can a school get Revolution Foods in their lunch rooms?


We are always eager to include more schools in this School Lunch Revolution. You can get in contact with us by emailing info@revolutionfoods.com . You can also check us out on the web at www.revolutionfoods.com.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Homeschooling - The Conversation Stopper

I am in Michigan for a few weeks with my children and recently stood at the curb with others from my home town to watch the Labor Day parade, which, incidentally turned out to be more lucrative than Halloween for my children, leading Ronan to declare that he would never again resist going to a parade. Afterwards I ran into a few old classmates and stopped to chat. I noticed a pattern to the conversations that begins just after the pleasantries:

"How long are you in town?"

"About three weeks. I drove here with my kids for a month-long road trip."

(A look of confusion dawns) "When do your kids start school?"

"I am homeschooling them, so any time, really."

"Oh."

At this point the conversation could use a defibulator or maybe an Epi-pen. To help revive it, I have sometimes provided more detail, explaining that I got laid off this summer and that seemed the best choice for my recently private-schooled children. However, this elicits sympathy rather than understanding and it implies a sense of resigned unhappiness that I do not feel. Although it is true that I got laid off, I look at it as a gift: an opportunity to simplify our lives, spend time with our children, and give them a great education.

I didn't always feel this way. There was a time in the not so distant past that I did not have much understanding or respect for the tradition of homeschooling. I felt that children needed more social time that being around hundreds of other children can provide and that only an institution could provide them with the pedigree necessary for entrance to a good college for the purposes of securing gainful employment. I also thought it would be difficult, frustrating, boring, and that it would even create unhealthy family dynamics. I was wrong on all counts and on many levels.

I've noticed many opportunities to change perspective lately. Where I have made a negative judgment about a person or a circumstance, eventually I seem to find myself experiencing the other side of it. Not only is it humbling, it broadens my perspective, opens my mind, and increases my compassion. It is karma in its best, most beneficial connotation.

From now on I am going to tell people that I am leading a year-long, experiential learning expedition that is tailored to meet the needs of each student. Because I am!

Sunday, September 6, 2009

The Fastest, Cheapest, Easiest Way to Enlightenment

The Dalai Lama was onced asked in front of a live audience what was the cheapest, fastest, easiest way to enlightenment. His reaction was to put his face in his hands and weep. After a few moments, he said that this was not a question a practioner (of meditation) would ask, and that if he knew what enlightment was, there would be no hesitation to do what it takes to attain it.

In this same way I could weep when I hear those who wield influence in the field of education talk about the cheapest, fastest, easiest way to get a kid through school. If we knew of the value of a rich, purposeful, meaningful education we would not hestitate to do what it takes to provide each child with one.

While enlightenment and graduation are very worthy end goals, there is a lot of time and effort that goes into them that cannot be sped through or done without mindfullness. This time and effort is not only necessary, but valuable in and of itself. As tempting as it is to get to the end goal, there are tremendous benefits all along the journey.

It may be no coincidence that Buddhism is referred to as a "path" rather than a religion. A path is a journey. The Buddhist path is full of opportunities for personal growth through and to self-discipline, practice, reflection, examination, striving, and compassion. It is through the thousands of attempts of mastery that we become masters. These are many of the qualities we would like for our children, and they each take time and effort. If education is viewed as a path, not just a goal, would we take the time to savor it, to value the everyday efforts and acheivement that make each experience an important step along the way?

How gratifying and powerful education would be if we all (politicians, parents, educators, students) viewed education as a path to explore slowly, carefully, and joyfully - as a daily gift. The thought that there may be no end to the path might change our perspective and our willingness to "do" rather than to "get".

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Happiness, Freedom, and Peace of Mind

“There is a wonderful mythical law of nature that the three things we crave most in life — happiness, freedom, and peace of mind — are always attained by giving them to someone else.” —Peyton C. March (1864-1955); General, US Army

How true this is! It is interesting the way life works out sometimes. My job as a salesperson was drying up and getting less and less satisfying, making me wish I were spending more time with my family. Presto! I got what I wanted... with a layoff. In effort to give my kids a better education, more time, and plenty of good memories, they have become more relaxed, happy, capable, and interested. However, I never thought that I would be feeling the same way. I really thought I would often feel harried, worried, and overwhelmed. Instead, giving them what I think they need right now has given me the same exact gift. Although I had some fear and trepidation about homeschooling, it has re-energized my parenting, made us a closer family, and has been a seriously fun adventure.

This week, we went to the Michigan Renaissance Festival, where we watched a sword fight, a band with bagpipes, many curious costumes, and very funny performers. We visited Cranbrook Institute of Science, where we saw and learned all about bats, sloths, owls, dinosaurs, and astronomy. We've kayaked, steered a motor boat, and hunted for crawfish, frogs, and turtles. Jude, who is 4 decided he was ready to take off the training wheels, and he is now a bike rider! Stopping gracefully will come eventually too. We have been to the library to get many, many books on some of the subjects we explored last week and those to come in the next few weeks. We've also enjoyed playing with friends here. Ronan, trying to impress his friend today said, "Watch this. I am going to do what no other idiot would do." He then laid down in the creek with his clothes on. He got more laughs than he anticipated with that line.

Lots of laughter, learning, and lasting memories are being created.

Sunday, August 30, 2009

We Have Arrived (Wet)






We did it - 1423 miles and 6 days of travel! It honestly went by incredibly fast because we have done and seen so much.

At Starved Rock State Park in Oglesby, Illinois we hiked around, reading about the Native American history. We discovered one of the many canyons, caves, and waterfalls there and were in awe. My kids groused a little about hiking but when they got to the waterfall they didn't want to leave. They thought it looked like a scene out of an Indiana Jones movie set and they explored the area for a couple of hours.

We had planned to head to the west shore of Michigan for sand dunes and beach fun, but the forecast made us rethink our plans. It called for more rain and 97% humidity. In some countries that percentage would be considered water boarding, but in the midwest it is called August. We instead opted for indoor culture in Chicago. We met our cousins at the Museum of Science and Technology and spent nearly 5 hours exploring there. The best parts were seeing a chick hatch and doing the many hands on experiments in the ideation room. We stayed only 24 hours in Chicago and many in our group parted involuntarily, so I promised to return for more culture and fun with the family on the way back.

The next stop was Anthony Cinzori's farm in Ceresco, Michigan. Anthony is a college buddy of mine from Michigan State University and he now runs the 270+ acre family farm, selling organic produce to Whole Foods Market, restaurants, and Farm Markets in the area. We toured the farm; ate okra, beans and watermelon right off the vine; drove a tractor; and saw the bee hives they rent for pollination purposes. We learned, among other many other things that green bell peppers are just unripe red, yellow, or orange bell peppers. That explains their stronger taste! My petless children admired the many cats and kittens in the barn for quite awhile. I called to see if we could bring home a kitten to Grandma's house. After the laughter subsided there was an emphatic "no", but we did leave with a lot very fresh vegetables in hand. I got a nostalgic dinner in at El Azteco, a restaurant I used to frequent in East Lansing and attempted to show my kids where I used to live and where I met their Dad but they weren't nearly as interested in that as I was. We made it to the Grandparents house by 7:00 PM.

We have lots of plans and down time with very little driving over the next three weeks we are here. Tomorrow we will visit the library and get some books on the subjects we would like to explore more after our experiences this week (like praying mantises, frogs and toads, planes and rockets, centrifugal force and more!)

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Sand, Serendipity, and Solitude


The road trip is off to a great start! The kids have been marvelous with all of the driving, without a single fight or issue so far. About 200 miles into the trip I saw a sign for Lake McConaughy. Although it was unplanned, we decided to stop there and were so glad we did! We had the beach nearly to ourselves. There is no joy quite like kids jumping in waves, building sand castles, and swimming (fully clothed) in a lake that was an unexpected treat. It was a wise stop considering I could not find the skate park I had planned later in the day, making that one hour of joyful play even more important.

We got to Mahoney State Park in Ashland, Nebraska at 8:30 and I managed top set up the tent with a barely working flashlight and a helpful 8 year old. Mahoney State Park and the surrounding area is a great place for families. I had all sorts of activities in mind, but let the kids decide what to do all day. We played miniature golf, rented a paddle boat, spent time in awe at the Wildlife Conservatory (seeing bison, cranes, elk, deer, and more up close in their own habitat), and wandered around the huge and impressive Strategic Air and Space Museum for several hours. We ended the day with a campfire and stories and slept to the sound of insects in full song.

I woke up this morning at 5:30 with the urge to get going, but I made myself relax since I was purposely not hurrying! I waited for about an hour, took a surprisingly hot shower, and started tearing down camp. I wish I would have listened to my intuition, because about half way through it started pouring. Had I gotten started when I wanted to, we would have driven away dry just as the rain started coming! I shoved the tent in its bag, bulging with water (it is impressively water tight!), and drove off. We saw a sign just before Des Moines, Iowa for L.T. Organic Farm Restaurant so we followed it for our brunch. What a serendipitous find! We wandered around the farm, greeting the chickens, petting the dog, talking to the owners, and swinging on the tree swings while the food was brought out to the picnic tables outside amidst all of the vegetables growing. It was the best meal I have had in a long time! The rain resumed as we were leaving.

In Davenport, Iowa, we tried for another skate park and struck out again. We did, however, find Niabi Zoo, which was a really spectacular small zoo. Because of our homeschool schedule and our use of rain gear, we had the entire zoo to ourselves. We walked with kangaroos and emus, fed ducks and fish, offered cups of nectar to very friendly, hungry lorakeets and more. After a two hour "private" zoo trip and dinner, we headed to Oglesby, Illinois at Starved Rock State Park with enough time to explore the area to scope out how to spend our time tomorrow.

We've already done over 900 miles of our 1200+ journey and it has passed quickly and pleasantly. I have really appreciated being able to take advantage of serendipitous finds, the flexibility to adjust our plans on the fly, and the feeling of having each place virtually to ourselves. There are definitely advantages to homeschooling!

Sunday, August 23, 2009

The Road Trip as a Metaphor for Education

I am taking my kids on a 2400 mile road trip. I have planned to drive from Denver to Michigan with many stops along the way. On the way there we will camp, hike, maybe ride some horses, go to the zoo, visit museums, go to a skate park or two, climb some sand dunes, play at the beach, and work on a farm. We plan on taking a week to get there, a few weeks in Michigan, and then several days to get back. Of course there will also be plenty of things to do and eat in the car to make the miles enjoyable. The idea is to enjoy the trip along the way, rather than just "get there" as fast as possible.

While planning this trip, I started to think of it as a metaphor for education. I could do this trip like my family used to do road trips from Michigan to Florida - straight through with very few breaks. Those miles were not a lot of fun for anyone and the goal was to maximize the time we spent at the destination before going home. This trip will be different. This trip is all about the journey, not just the destination. Instead of hurrying up to get to the goal, we are going to purposefully experience the trip all along the way.

I also think of education as a journey, rather than a destination. There is no agreement on what the purpose of education is, but obviously there are many benefits to a good education. John Dewey said that "Education is not preparation for life; education is life itself." I agree. Education should allow plenty of unstructured time for wonder and reflection - there is even value in boredom in that it encourages creativity, responsibility, problem-solving, and self-motivation. Education should be based on interests rather than mandates. It should grant equal time to and nurturing of the head, heart, and hands.

We have struggled to get this kind of education in the public schools, so this year I will be homeschooling. It is what allows me the luxury of taking a month at this time of year to travel and giving my kids broad, flexible, appropriately paced, rich educational (life!) experiences.

Of course I do have the goal that my children will be able to read, do math, understand science principles, etc., just as my end point goal is to get to Michigan and then safely back home. However, I don't plan on hurrying through to get to the goal. I will not be speed teaching by force or pressure or competition. There won't be a lot of drilling or testing. I plan on creating an educational setting that feels like an enjoyable part of every day life. I hope my kids get more than academics from this kind of education. I would like them to continue to learn, to be curious, to wonder, to investigate throughout their lives.

Although I am a former teacher, I have never homeschooled before. I plan to take an eclectic approach, borrowing from educational modalities that I have investigated and come to respect a great deal. Those include Democratic, Experiential, Waldorf and Montessori methods. I think the qualities in me that will be critical to making this year a success will be planning, an open mind, curiosity, discipline, compassion, and being fully present. A positive attitude and a good sense of humor will likely come in handy too. I do hope we meet other homeschoolers with whom we can share ideas, experiences, support, laughter and frustrations.

I have talked to plenty of people this summer about my plans for the road trip and to homeschool. Some of them view both as inadvisable at best and inescapable torture at worst. I have no doubt that both will be challenging at times, but I do feel that overall they will both be incredibly positive, rewarding experiences. I will be sharing these journeys of ours that are life itself all along the way!

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Holistic Dance Instruction - An Interview with Between the Bones Founder, Mary Lynn Lewark

Nationally recognized for her solo choreography and performances by age 18, Mary Lynn Lewark's passion for dance, creativity and education fueled her desire to build a dance school. Since founding Between the Bones in 1996, she has produced and directed 11 original productions. Today, Mary Lynn continues to generate new and innovative dance experiences for her students and faculty. Her life experiences as a dance artist and educator – as well as mother to Sydney, Ellery and Lucy - bring a joyous “break the mold” dance curriculum to Between the Bones.

How did you get into dance instruction?

I have been a dancer most of my life. By the age of 18 I had my share of dance injuries. I had been teaching dance and got my degree in education. My first teaching job was at an Expeditionary Learning School, where I taught Kindergarten through 2nd grade for three years. I was struck at how the way the school is set up so that everyone wins and everyone learns. It is very collaborative rather than competitive. Yet, typically in dance it is very competitive and is designed to ensure that only the best participate. When I opened up my dance school I wanted to build on the idea formed in Expeditionary Learning that dancing, too, could be collaborative and inclusive and yet still competitive with other programs. I like the idea of working thematically and then building backwards; thinking about what you want a dancer to be in the end– expressive, graceful, talented and skilled, athletic, healthy and working backwards to put elements in place to allow them to achieve just that.

I understand you take an unconventional approach to dance instruction in that you teach in a holistic way? Can you describe that?

What is unique about our school is the somatic nature of it using the Feldenkrais philosophy. Somatic education has many forms but they lend themselves to teaching people how to use their bodies well. The Feldenkrais Method teaches possibilities of movement, through experience rather than imitation. Over the last ten years I have worked with Feldenkrais Practitioner Bethany Cobb applying the Method to our dance education. Typically you get to Feldenkrais only after an injury or as you get older. That is how I found it! But I thought, why wait for that? Including Feldenkrais in our dance curriculum builds a foundation along the way for knowing and understanding our bodies, when to push, when to listen and how to reduce the risk of injury.

What is Feldenkrais and how does it benefit people?

Moshe Feldenkrais is the man who originated it as a form of rehabilitating his self. I look at it as a constructivist model for learning. Its philosophy is to set up a situation for learning without telling the students what they will learn. Dancing is usually about imitation and this is the opposite. It is designed to encourage an internal knowing. It helps to make people to become more aware of their bodies and helps to reduce the risk of injury by breaking down movement so that learning can occur. These days we see a lot of people who are much less coordinated and less flexible. It is likely a result of our way of living, where we don’t climb trees or run, our play is restricted. No one comes in perfect. We all have missed developmental milestones, like crossing over the mid-line, right and left coordination, etc. Dance and Feldenkrais help to achieve these.

What is the mission of Between the Bones?

It is to provide a balanced dance education. What I mean by that is we want to balance strength with softness; technique with expression; skills with self-awareness. By balancing each aspect of dance with its opposite the kids become whole people, whole dancers.

How does Between the Bones help students grow, learn and succeed outside of the studio or off the stage?

Dance in general gives body awareness and confidence. You are the ultimate multi-tasker as a dancer – you have to be present yet think ahead. You have to do a difficult move with great concentration yet express a sense of ease or something else. It takes tremendous self-control and elegance. You have to be able to learn quickly. Dance students make great problem solvers. When you make a mistake on stage you have to be able to deal with that and move on. You don’t know exactly what is going to happen next, so you have to be open to it. Dancing in a performance will help build skills in any field. It helps with both process and product and encourages intellectual curiosity and interest.

The way you integrate dance with other related topics, like nutrition, classic literature, and history brings these lessons alive for your students. Describe how dance can make other subjects meaningful.

I am biased but I believe you could learn everything through dance! When you are researching before a dance performance, you look into the time periods and observe why they are wearing what they are wearing. You get a look at the politics and religious values of that time while preparing for the dance. When we did Alice in Wonderland we explored that period of time and talked a lot about the author, the historical time frame, and did a lot of critical thinking and questioning in preparation for the performance to really understand what we were going to be doing and telling.

I appreciate that you encourage students of all body types to dance. Please tell me about your philosophy in that regard.

Modern dance and jazz are particularly more accepting of bodies of all types. The goal is to be healthy and in shape and it is a challenge to balance healthy with rigorous. The dancing we do requires skill and discipline. We’ve had body types of all kinds and many on the too thin side. It is helpful if they get caught up in dance and find it in themselves to improve for their own benefit rather than through the external pressure imposed on them. Feldenkrais is good with providing a balanced approach and a sense of self.

How can dance help us tap into the Age of Creativity?

At Between the Bones we use the story to drive our work and our performances. When the dancers are a part of the creative process like they are at Between the Bones, they become part of a collaborative team involving teachers, costume makers, and students to take a leap and solve problems that haven’t been solved before. It is not just imitative or just a recital. The story gives boundaries and rules and allows us to think creatively. It is constructivist: you throw all of the pieces together that you can work with, knowing that those are the only things you can use to create. Let’s see what happens.

For more information on Between the Bones, visit: www.betweenthebones.com

Petition for Healthy School Lunches

The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine needs your help to revolutionize school lunches across America! All students have a right to have healthful plant-based options in their schools. But unfortunately, most schools don’t offer these healthful options.

Now is the time for action. Congress is revising the Child Nutrition Act, which determines what foods are served in school lunches. Sign the petition today to tell Congress that students deserve nutritious foods—more fruits, vegetables, vegetarian foods, and healthful nondairy beverages.

Sign the Petition at: http://www.healthyschoollunches.org

Also consider attending the following Town Halls
Eagle County Town Hall
Aug 19, 2009 - Wednesday, August 19th Eagle County Town Hall Singletree Community Center 1010 Berry Creek Road Edwards, CO 81632 4:30 – 5:30 PM For more information, visit http://polis.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=140664

Adams County Town Hall
Sep 5, 2009 - Saturday, September 5th Adams County Town Hall Welby New Technology High School 1200 East 78th Avenue #105 Thornton, CO 80229 1:00 - 3:00 PM For more information, visit http://polis.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=140668

For more information, visit <http://www.healthyschoollunches.org/>

Sunday, August 16, 2009

Opening a Public Waldorf School - an Interview with Alliance for Public Waldorf Education

How does the Alliance for Public Waldorf Education assist people and communities?

The Alliance for Public Waldorf Education is a member organization, supporting established schools, developing schools and initiatives in the planning and start up phase. The Alliance provides resources and free consultation from experienced administrators to its member schools. In addition, the Alliance provides an annual conference, professional development opportunities, and is developing partnerships in support of the public/charter schools movement.

How close does the public version of Waldorf come to the traditional Waldorf schools?

The curriculum and pedagogical approach looks very similar in both public and independent Waldorf schools. The public sector lens comes with additional transparency and accountability requirements, particularly around documenting grade-by-grade curriculum and academic standards. Most people wouldn’t notice much difference in the classroom if they visited a private Waldorf school or a public school inspired by Waldorf education.

With public schools' inflexibility on standardized testing, how do you keep the integrity of the pace of Waldorf with literacy?

At most public Waldorf schools, the curriculum doesn’t vary much from the traditional independent Waldorf program. Meeting literacy and all academic standards while nurturing the development of the whole child is integral to a Waldorf education. A Waldorf curriculum takes a different approach to reading in grades one and two; however, students are not tested in most states until grade three, by which time students’ literacy is basically on par with the testing standards. California schools test a year earlier than the federal government recommends or requires, and students tend to do poorly on the second grade exams. In later years, however, student test results are comparable and above, as would be expected with the full Waldorf curriculum.

In public Waldorf schools, do the students stick with the same teacher for 8 years or at least several years?

Yes. When a teacher has a class for several years, the teacher and the children come to know and understand each other in a deeper way. Children who feel secure in that familiar relationship, may be better able to learn. The interaction of teacher and parents also can become meaningful over time, which can be supportive to the child’s development.

How do you strive to keep the hands, heart and head balance in the public school setting?

Waldorf curriculum and pedagogy seeks to nurture all aspects of the child’s development leading to excellence in intellectual and academic capabilities. Artistic and practical subjects such as gardening, hand work, and woodworking play a significant role in preparing students for life in the ‘real’ world.

In addition to reading, writing, math, history, geography, and the sciences, children learn to sing, play a musical instrument, draw, paint, carve and work with wood, speak clearly and act in a play, think independently, and work harmoniously and respectfully with others. Lessons are primarily delivered orally by the teacher in a thoughtful, interactive and artistic manner, thereby engaging hands, heart and head into all lessons and activities of a student’s day.

How many public Waldorf schools are there in the United States?

There are 46 schools and initiatives in the United States.

How successful have they been?

Lower grade students moving to a comprehensive high school (public or private) are often recognized for their keen ability to think, for being well-rounded young adults, and as having experience as learners rather than merely digesters. High school graduates are likely to have well developed sense of themselves, sound thinking and reasoning skills, a genuine curiosity of their world, and love of learning. While public schools inspired by Waldorf education are relatively new in the United States, even the most prestigious colleges embrace Waldorf educated students as likely to be a contributing, engaged student and have a successful college experience. The Yuba River Charter School in Nevada City, CA, whose oldest graduates are now 25 years old, has had a group graduate from UCLA and Berkeley this year and has their first high school graduate attending Harvard. Other students are now finishing graduate school and one is a Waldorf teacher!

For more information on the Alliance for Public Waldorf Education, go to http://allianceforpublicwaldorfeducation.org/

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Reggio Emilia - Another Fine Italian Import Interpreted by Daniel Bigler

Daniel Bigler, previously a guest blogger here has graciously returned to explain Reggio Emilia. Daniel is a former Reggio Emilia-inspired teacher and eloquently explains more on this education modality or philosophy.

What is the Reggio Emilia philosophy?

It might be best to understand the philosophy within the context of its birthplace: Reggio Emilia, Italy. Reggio Emilia is a small region in northern Italy and after the devastation of World War II, many of its local communities and parents began to realize that the way to move beyond this violence laid within education. So among the war-torn rubble, mothers literally began to piece their communities back together by coming around their young children and building preschools for them. Loris Malaguzzi was a young journalist and educator at the time and impressed by the parents' efforts. He helped them build a system of schools that would ultimately support their different concept of how to exist within the world.

In many respects, it's hard to separate what's become known as the Reggio Emilia philosophy of education with their larger philosophy of life. If I had to try, though, it'd be characterized by these things:

* A respect for children and their capacities and curiosities

* An emergent curriculum that comes from the children and their inquiries about the world, which often manifests in in-depth project work

* A belief that children can learn through different "languages" and art mediums, and that representing and exploring learning through these is central to true understanding. Thus, at the center of every classroom is the Art Studio

* A sense of harmony and connection between the classroom and the broader community, the natural world, and others

* A letting go of time, of hurriedness and unnecessary expectations as part of an attempt to get back to the joy of learning. "Nothing without joy," as Loris Malaguzzi once said.

There's probably many other defining characteristics of the Reggio Emilia philosophy and each person I've found working in it is drawn to the philosophy for different reasons. I can only explore and share what Reggio Emilia is to me – though many others, like Lella Gandini, Louise Boyd-Cadwell, and George Forman have done a truly fantastic job at introducing Reggio Emilia's philosophy and practices to American audiences. There's a wealth of wisdom about education and "the Reggio Emilia way" in their books, if you're interested.

I understand it is more of a guiding philosophy than a methodology or set curriculum. Can you explain that?

Reggio Emilia's philosophy about education can really be summed up, I think, with this question: What is your Image of the child? Do you view children as capable, competent, strong, and wise? Do children have something to contribute to broader society? Are they able to be in charge of their own learning?

I wonder if you really have to be in the right place mentally, to work in a truly Reggio-inspired way: a conceptual place where you no longer place any "value" on education in the sense that you expect it to do certain things, and produce pre-established sets of knowledge and skills. This approach requires you to take a step back and do away with all the adult expectations of what children "should be learning" and instead just allow and encourage the children in front of you to learn what comes naturally to them. The emphasis is really shifted from the system to the child.

It's often mistakenly assumed that the Reggio Emilia philosophy requires less work of the teacher, because you don't have a curriculum; but really, it is the opposite. As a teacher, you're asked to be constantly and deeply engaged with the children you're among, and constantly reflective of where they are at mentally, emotionally, physically – fully aware of the possibilities of where their learning might go from here.

It's sort of as if you're committed philosophically to making everything up as you go along, without the past theorists and wealth of knowledge about "child development" to fall back on and get in the way of recognizing the children as they truly are. You're certainly engaged with these ideas from the broader culture, but you take nothing for granted. Instead of some checklist handed off from above or an abstract theory a guy wrote in a book once of how and what children learn, the children themselves become the benchmark for whether you're doing it right.

Reggio Emilia touches on our connection to each other, the community, the food on our plate, etc. Why is relationship and connection so important?

I'm certain some of this is simply reflective of the Reggio Emilia philosophy's Italian roots: the Italians emphasize family, simplicity, enjoyment. Their worldview is one of living life slowly and appreciating it fully, with others close to them. In that way, the way Reggio Emilia does "education" is a natural extension of how they do "life" altogether.

I don't know how much of this transfers easily (especially to America), since so much of it is worldview, but I do think there some important truths here. For instance, if we want kids to really explore an interest deeply and passionately, mindful that it's largely the process and not the content that matters most in children's cognitive development, then we have to give them ample time to do so. We have to value unstructured, unhurried days and not be bound to the clock. We have to let kids continue to play and build, even though our adult heads might say it's time to put away the blocks and sit down for lunch. Children need to be able to depend on and expect a certain continuity to their work – they have to be able to trust that they can revisit, for instance, their pretend dinosaur play or pirate ship block building the next day and the next, and not be hurried along to another thing on some curriculum list somewhere.

Likewise, if we want our children to truly know the value of human life and learn how to work and collaborate together then we have to emphasize and build *real* communities, and we have to set the structure and culture of our classroom so that everybody in it (adults and kids alike) truly rely and depend on each other, with an equal investment in the community as well as self.

In the same way, the children *have to* be connected to the broader community, woven into the fabric of the broader social life happening around them. They shouldn't be shoved aside in a child care classroom, guarded by a gatekeeper, while the adults of a community go off to work and live. Children need to be present and an active part of the life of a community – they need to be known and accepted at the local farmer's market, the park, area businesses.

This idea of fostering true community among children and integrating them into the broader community might be the biggest obstacle for American schools hoping to transplant the Reggio Emilia philosophy. Our strong individualistic tendencies and emphasis often get in the way of children truly learning to be a part of a broader classroom, community, or world. We often want our children to "develop" enough and become "educated" enough, become autonomous enough before we weave them into our society. But if we stop and think, this is a rather silly way of doing it. If we what we're after is empowered, capable, strong learners and thinkers who can go out into our society and make the world better, then we absolutely need to have them be an integral, welcomed and supported part of that world first.

I think most Italians would be appalled at our "child care" centers – aghast especially at the idea that we treat children's care as an economic good. Children have become little more than add-ons to our lives, not connected in any meaningful way to the broader cultural life and community. Until they are quality, purposeful early childhood education in America can never be fully realized.

How is the role of the teacher different in this setting?

Most education occurs within a deficit-oriented, authority-based paradigm. Teachers work to put knowledge and skills out into the classroom, making them accessible to children "at their level", so that children can become filled up with those (very culturally-bound) things. It's a future-oriented setting, always with the teachers looking onward at what children need to know next, looking for ways to impart this knowledge to them. Simply put, most education has children as passive bystanders in their own education.

In the Reggio Emilia philosophy, the opposite is the case: teachers believe that children are natural learners and inherently empowered individuals capable of incredible thinking and inquiry. The world, as Reggio-inspired teachers see it, is rich enough for children to learn from – and unless they've been taught out of it, children have a natural and insatiable curiosity for knowledge and understanding. Children are encouraged to experiment and make mistakes, to explore their own interests, The teacher's role is simply to support this, taking their cue from the child himself.

It's easy to mistake this as doing nothing, but in actuality there's a lot more work involved with this kind of teaching paradigm. One of the main new roles of the teacher is as observer and documenter: teachers listen to children's dialogue and questions, observe their play and activities, and root out their deeper passions and interests. Then in documenting their observations, teachers give themselves something to reflect on, an insight about further "provocations" and subtle changes they can offer, that might add a richer, deeper dimension to the children's exploration and activity. You slowly see the classroom's curriculum "emerge" this way, with teachers using their observation and documentation to reflexively introduce just "one more thing" to the classroom at a time – careful not to get too ahead of the children, but at the same time artfully scaffolding their experiences.

There is, of course, many other role implications to such a drastically different teaching paradigm. The teachers are collaborators with children, and don't necessarily provide them the answers, rather they encourage open-ended inquiry. At its core is this different concept of relating to children.

What is meant by the expression, The Hundred Languages of Children?

Understandably, it's not a literal expression and it's also not meant to be limiting, as "the hundred" might suggest. Instead, the expression "The Hundred Languages of Children" encapsulates the idea that children discover, learn, do, and exist in endless ways. Think of Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligences: it's the notion that children learn and achieve literacy about a topic through multiple ways, many different languages. The Hundred Languages is meant to communicate this open expanse of opportunity about how learning can happen.

It's also meant to engender a certain respect and acknowledge for each child as a gifted, thoughtful, and unique individual. A child may be naturally gifted at dance. Or a child might choose to sketch a drawing to express his understanding of how leaves form and maybe resemble the "skeleton bones" in our hands. The visual arts, physical movement, speech, music, hand work, dance, dramatic play... all of these can be languages of learning for children. Reggio-inspired teachers recognize this, and work with children to open these languages up to them for their use. This is why the L'Atelier – the "Art Studio" – is at the heart of any Reggio Emilia-inspired classroom. Through developing a proficiency in and meaningfully using these languages, children can – on their own, in the very truest sense of empowerment – deeply engage and explore topics, ideas, and inquiries in very real and concrete ways.

From a scientific perspective, allowing and encouraging children to explore one topic or object through a diverse variety of physical media increases and enhances the neurological connections centralized around that topic or object, deepening a child's schema of understanding about that thing. Representing and exploring things in different ways allows our brains to fully, comprehensively understand and appreciate those things in a way that simple bookwork would never allow.

How does this approach address matters of balance (academic, emotional, social, physical, etc.)?

You know, I think there's just a natural holism to the Reggio Emilia approach. Teachers approach children as a whole, and I don't think that many people who work in this approach tend to think much about these matters of balancing the social, emotional, physical, cognitive domains. It simply comes rather naturally.

I sometimes think we, as adults break children's lives and experiences down too much. We narrow a child's life to such precisely defined parameters, that I wonder if we lose a part of it in the process. I don't think that the Reggio Emilia approach neglects any of these aspects of life. In fact, I think the balance is a lot richer and deeper than most educational approaches – but it's not something we spend any particular effort in doing. When you discard any adult expectations of how children should be, and view them simply as they are, it's much easier to meet children's needs.

How does the approach take sides in the debate of play-based education or early learning education in the younger years?

I don't know if the approach particularly does take sides. For its part, the Reggio Emilia philosophy is largely about culture. At its core it's a way of thinking about children, acknowledging their abilities and listening to them. There's a decent amount of mutual respect involved, but how this approach might actually "look" depends drastically on the individual community it's in and a part of.

Naturally, some classrooms may be more play and exploratory-based, while others might seem more "serious"; it simply depends on the children, the culture and experiences they bring with them, and how their interests manifest in the every-day activity of the classroom. Often this is through play, but sometimes it's through arts-based representation and exploration, project work, or other ways. As adults, we just try to let it happen, whatever it is and support it however we can. Of course as teachers we're kept incredibly busy but our roles change, from say, instructors and traffic monitors to observers, documentarians, provocateurs, and co-learners.

At the preschool I worked at – with many of our parents being working professionals – we had the children for a good portion of the day. We spent much of the morning engaged in more "focused" work, spending a lot of time in our art studio, either exploring and practicing different art media, or continuing long-term projects if we have any going on. The larger part our day has a natural, relaxed ebb and flow to it. We try to minimize transitions and group or adult-directed times during the day and children mainly work and play in small groups with their friends. The "curriculum" and activity of the classroom emerges from their own thoughts and ideas. In this way, "education" becomes a living, breathing thing, when put in the hands of the children themselves.

Is it only for younger kids?

Not at all! One of the very best (elementary) schools I've seen was a charter school in Portland, Oregon, that worked out of a Reggio-inspired philosophy. They had a preschool program, yes, but they also had grades above that – up to 5th grade, the last time I was there. It's very much a philosophy that largely transcends both age and, for that matter, culture.

The philosophy manifests itself in different ways at different ages, of course. When I was at this particular school, for instance, the 3rd and 4th graders were wrapping up these immensely impressive and elaborate projects on issues like civil rights, explored and represented through different media and experiences. They also didn't neglect the more "traditional" subjects like mathematics, although they explore them through holistic, interdisciplinary means, like integrating math with their other projects, for instance, or through kinesthetic and spatial means, like advanced architectural building with blocks.

The preschoolers, on the other end, had spent the year exploring issues of power and identity. The class had some unusually active young boys, and instead of having their unusually strong inclination toward rough-and-tumble play and pretend fighting suppressed, the teachers recognized its connection with another strong interest the children had that year – their interest in the animals that they saw at their semi-regular trips to a nearby zoo. The teachers magnificently wove both of these threads together, and, over time, these kids knew and, as unusual as it sounds, could innately sympathize with these animals on such an intimate level. Toward the end of the year, they spent several long weeks in the art studio, the children laboring intently over what would become these elaborately detailed, intricately painted paper måché masks that represented the different zoo animals. They finished them just in time for one last trip to the zoo, where the children donned their masks and truly, physically, emotionally *became* the animals on the other side of the fences. It's these transcendent moments that you only rarely get to witness that let you know there can truly be more – a lot more – to a child's education.

So the philosophy may appear differently at different ages, but it's very much for any age. If there's a central commitment to supporting children's inquiry, learning through arts- and materials-based representation and expression, and reflective, community-based teaching practices, then the Reggio philosophy can, in my mind really be taken anywhere.

How does the Reggio Emilia classroom look and feel compared to a conventional classroom?

In terms of the materials, I don't know if this is as defined as some would like to think. The philosophy can inspire any teacher or school – even those with few resources or funding – and it's really mostly the immaterial culture that stands in sharpest contrast to conventional classrooms.

I do think, though, that when teachers and adults are mindful about the environment that the children are in– "The Third Teacher," as the Reggio Emilia approach calls it, they find ways around resource limitations to imbue their environment with a certain spirit. Children learn just as much from the physical spaces and places around them, from the materials around them, so this is important. Even if a school is dirt-broke though, teachers can carefully consider what physically is allowed in their classroom, only permitting what they find to be meaningful or provocative to children's learning, in harmony with the children themselves and the spirit of the classroom as a whole. Teachers can foster attunement with the natural world by bringing in stumps, leaves, dirt, and so forth and they encourage resourcefulness and creativity by bringing in materials that are largely "blank" of their own accord in the beginning, but which allow children to project their own worlds and play onto them. In this sense, minimalism can often be a good thing – one of the best things, in fact. Children aren't distracted by the horrendously bright colors and flashy "educational" posters found in most conventional classrooms, and instead their classroom space really begins to take on, over time the simple lives and character of the children themselves.

It's this sense of harmony and attunement with the children themselves – not just some far off, distant concept of who the children are or should be – that I really can't adequately describe. It's very much a dynamic thing, changing over the years with different groups of children, and because it comes from individual children, it can never be replicated.

This harmony can in many ways be encouraged by setting a soothing, calm stage without distractions, by allowing the natural world in, placing live plants in and around the classroom, and by doing what is possible to let natural light in. This also means discouraging adult-designed or overly-specific toys or displays, and replacing the cute alphabet and weather posters with children's own artwork, carefully articulated documentation of children's learning, and photographs. Certainly, great attention is also given to the Art Studio, to make it a place of rich and diverse opportunity for exploring material languages and representing learning. There are a great many ideas and strategies that may physically set aside a Reggio Emilia-inspired classroom from others. But in the end, it's the classroom's teacher who has the responsibility to mindfully this place.

This place will be different for each context, taking into account the culture, material resources at hand, and the children's lives – but we usually find that if teachers take the proper time out to think through the environment, not simply settling for the status quo out of a catalog but carefully considering the physical space in the perspective of this different philosophy of children and learning, then they end up with a classroom offering children much more meaning and spirit than a conventional classroom.

Daniel's blog can be found at http://www.danielsaurus.com

Monday, August 10, 2009

Ecoliteracy - An Interview with Lisa Bennett

Lisa Bennett is the communications director for the Center for Ecoliteracy. She is also a former fellow at Harvard University's Center on Press, Politics, and Public Policy in the John F. Kennedy School of Government, and is currently writing a book about parents and global warming.

What is the mission of the Center for Ecoliteracy?

Our mission is education for sustainable living. We provide expertise, inspiration, and support to the immensely hopeful and vital schooling for sustainability movement that is rising among a growing number of public and independent schools in the U.S.

We’re committed to this for two reasons: First, because schooling for sustainability is grounded in ecological knowledge and hands-on experiences in the natural world—and this kind of schooling inherently stimulating, relevant, and alive. It makes education exciting again.

Second, schooling for sustainability is a promising answer to our many environmental challenges. Addressing climate change, the end of cheap energy, and other issues, after all, will require citizens who can think ecologically. And where else can young people be prepared for this but at school?

What services do you provide for schools?

We offer a wide range of services, depending on what a particular school needs. In fact, our work typically begins with identifying the appropriate starting point for each school. Usually, this tends to be the theme or pathway most people in that school community care about. It might, for example, be around food, gardens, the campus, community, or larger curriculum.

We offer seminars that attract people from around the United States and many other countries, and books, such as Ecological Literacy: Educating Our Children for a Sustainable World and Smart by Nature: Schooling for Sustainability, which will be available in September 2009.

We also offer curriculum audits, coaching for teaching and learning, in-depth curriculum development, school sustainability report cards, and technical assistance. You can find more information at www.ecoliteracy.org/about/services.html

What kinds of schools do you typically work with?

We have worked with hundreds of schools, both public and independent, and seen extraordinary successes in almost every setting imaginable. The article, “Greening a K-12 Curriculum,” describes how we worked with one school that sought to integrate sustainability education throughout its entire curriculum. (See http://www.ecoliteracy.org/publications/head_royce.html)

Why is sustainability an important concept for an elementary school student? Shouldn’t they spend their time on reading and math instead?

The good news is that this is not an either-or choice. That is, schooling for sustainability is not another “add on” that teachers must somehow squeeze into their day. Rather, it is a richly creative approach to education that allows teachers to integrate an ecological shift in perspective into subjects ranging from art and English to science and mathematics.

To support this shift, the Center for Ecoliteracy offers a framework called Smart by Nature: Schooling for Sustainability (also the title of our new book!) This is grounded in four guiding principles, which can be applied in a single classroom or entire K-12 school:

1. Nature Is Our Teacher
2. Sustainability Is a Community Practice
3. The Real World Is the Optimal Learning Environment
4. Sustainable Living Is Rooted in a Deep Knowledge of Place

I love the statement that food is an organizing principle for encouraging ecological understanding. It certainly brings ecology from the conceptual level to the practical, meaningful level. Can you explain this more fully?

Food is so central to human survival and experience that it can be a pathway for integrating nearly any subject—science, health, history, social studies, geography, art, economics. Nutrition education makes more sense when studied in the context of how nature provides.

How we grow, process, transport, market, prepare, and dispose of food is critical to the central issues of sustainable living: resource use, energy, pollution, water and soil conservation. Food serves as an ideal entry point for understanding the interrelations of such world issues as hunger, trade policy, energy use, and climate change.

Students can track the sources of the food in their lunches and calculate the resources and energy used to bring it to them. They can research what types of foods would be available to them if they were to adopt a regional “hundred-mile diet”—eating only food grown within a hundred-mile radius in order to emphasize fresh and seasonal ingredients, support local agriculture, and reduce the energy and expense needed to preserve and ship food over long distances.

You advocate education of the head, hands and heart. Why not just the head, as most schools focus on and test?

As our cofounder and executive director, Zenobia Barlow says, "We know from considerable experience that human beings struggle with cognitive dissonance, which means that we can uphold an idea or a value, while simultaneously acting in ways that are inconsistent with that idea or value, causing us to resolve those dissonances or rationalize them. Our current lifestyles are an example in terms of consumption and its implications. Left to the head alone, we are in trouble as a species."

Sustainability is also a practice that involves skills. Addressing environmental problems like climate change requires complex thinking and changes in behavior. For example, look at how the Southern Hemisphere—or the people on the other side of the tracks, so to speak—is forced to live with the consequences of our decisions to place toxic dumpsites or ship toxic waste to their backyards. To fully grasp this issue, one needs to genuinely care about who is downstream, and then act on it. The Head alone won't get us there.

Furthermore, living sustainably implies living in community. It's not for the faint-hearted or the single person dwelling in isolation. Living sustainably involves relationship, communication, and cooperation skills. We can’t achieve mastery by reading or philosophizing about them.

If you read the brain research on how people learn, it's multi-modal. Talking at people about ideas isn't a very effective education strategy. People learn by actively constructing their knowledge base—and that is best accomplished by engagement, grappling with real problems.

The people who dreamed up nuclear energy or bombs without having figured out what to do with the toxic waste exemplify what happens when education primarily engages the head.

Humans have a range of competencies. Education poses the challenge of responding to the vast spectrum of human capabilities. Remember the notion of "I think therefore I am." That was the Cartesian logic of a few centuries ago. We need an updated education model, don't you think?

It seems Ecoliteracy takes on not only the classroom, but the school at large, involving the staff and community as well. It demonstrates that schools are not just institutions for students learning, but, as you put it, they should be a healthy network of relationships that include everyone. What is the school sustainability report card and what is done to help schools achieve good marks on it?

Absolutely! Because, as we say in our Smart by Nature principles, sustainability is a community practice. That is, sustainability depends on a healthy network of relationships that includes all members of the community.

When educators, parents, trustees, and other members of the school community make decisions and act collaboratively, they demonstrate sustainability as a community practice. School communities also have the opportunity to model sustainable practice through the ways in which they provision themselves with food, energy, and other basic needs, and how they relate to the larger communities of which they are a part.

The Center for Ecoliteracy sustainability report card is a broad assessment of schools' sustainability policies and practices. It is conducted through the lens of campus, curriculum, community, and school food systems.

Tell me about Smart by Nature.

Smart by Nature: Schooling for Sustainability a new book from the Center for Ecoliteracy and our senior editor Michael K. Stone. Available in September 2009 from U.C. Press and Amazon.com, it portrays the hopeful new sustainability movement that is growing among public and independent schools in the U.S.

Endorsed by Daniel Goleman, Alice Waters, the National Wildlife Federation and others, Smart by Nature offers a compelling framework for schooling for sustainability that is based on nearly 20 years of experience in schools. With its roots in systems thinking and whole-school change, this framework is organized around the four central principles I mentioned earlier: Nature is our teacher; Sustainability is a community practice; The real world is the optimal learning environment; and Sustainable living is rooted in a deep knowledge of place.

This book also offers concrete strategies for greening the campus and curriculum, conducting environmental audits, rethinking school food, and transforming schools into models of sustainable community.

Smart by Nature is also the name of our larger initiative that is dedicated to supporting the schooling for sustainability movement nationwide. You can learn more by signing up for our newsletter at www.ecoliteracy.org

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Balance in Democratic Education - An Interview with Sam Chaltain

Sam Chaltain is the National Director of the Forum for Education and Democracy, a DC-based education “action tank” devoted to restoring the public purpose of public education. He is also the founding director of the Five Freedoms Project, a national program that helps K-12 principals create more equitable, high-functioning learning environments. Previously, Sam spent five years at the First Amendment Center as the co-director of the First Amendment Schools program. I approached Sam with some concerns and much admiration for the Democratic model of education. By the end of the interview I was convinced that this is one the best education modalities going.

Meghan McCain recently got slammed for not having an encyclopedic knowledge of history, when she admitted to not knowing much about a certain historic event.  While she did inadvisably blame her lack of knowledge on her youth, it begs the question: what *should* a child should know when he graduates from high school?

I am less interested in mandating what a child should know than I am in exploring what s/he should understand and be able to do. As I wrote in a recent Huffington Post op-ed <http://cli.gs/hJUVPp> , if our goal is to prepare students to succeed in college and the workplace, the standards we pursue should be whatever young people need most to be successful in college and the workplace. And in today's world, although young graduates certainly need a foundation of content knowledge, the greater measure of their long-term success will be the extent to which they learn to use their minds well.

Using one's mind well means more than just acquiring large numbers of discrete facts; it means learning how to find, analyze, and use information in adaptive ways. It doesn't mean content doesn't matter either - just that our decisions about which content to teach (and why) should be made at the school level, by the people who know students best - their teachers. Neither does it mean we should throw up our hands and say there are certain things we just can't measure. http://mc2paedia.wikispaces.com/habits

I believe we have a responsibility to ensure that, say, a school in California and a school in Mississippi are reaching for the same golden ring. Common standards would be useful, therefore, but they must be aspirational, not basic. They must be guideposts, not hitching posts. And they must be indicators of wisdom that students will need to be successful in college and the workplace, not shards of knowledge that make it easier to devise uniform tests and mandate standardized modes of instruction.

Is there a set of core skills, like literacy or basic math skills that you feel is important to someone fresh out of school and looking for a job?

I spoke to this a bit in the previous question, but I'll get more specific by using the example of a school in NH where the curriculum is organized around seventeen skills (the school calls them 'habits') of mind and being. Content is one of several ways - professional internships, wilderness treks, and shared governance are others - through which the school helps young people cultivate these core skills, including habits as elusive as "collaboration" and "quality work." http://mc2paedia.wikispaces.com/habits

I'm not suggesting this school's set should become the requirement for all schools - just that it is vital to decide as a school community what core skills you want your graduates to acquire, and to then work backwards from those skills to ensure that your school's curricula and activities are all aligned to help young people develop accordingly. Short of this, as it has been said before, any road will get you there.

I am respectful of everyone learning at his own pace, yet I know of someone in a Democratic school that is 15 years old and cannot yet read.  I am very uncomfortable with that.  I feel like that child has missed out on years of beauty, learning, independence - the very thing that Democratic/Open schools are supposed to nurture.  Can you comment on that?

This is the central riddle I try to answer in my forthcoming book, American Schools: The Art of Creating a Democratic Learning Community. The crux of the problem is that many schools are unaware of a fundamental tension that exists in all of us - on one hand, there is the irresistible, universal human impulse for freedom - and for feeling in control of our own destiny and determining the shape of the world around us. And on the other hand, there is an equally pressing human desire for structure, safety and a sense of order to the world.  

These two universal needs – for freedom on one hand, and structure on the other – are particularly relevant to our nation’s school leaders, who must strike the right balance between the two in order to create healthy, high-functioning learning environments. And yet in my years as an educator, I have witnessed scores of schools that choose, consciously or unconsciously, to value one of these needs at the expense of the other. In some schools, like the one you described, students are given too much freedom, and adults end up abdicating their responsibility to serve as authoritative guides for the learning process. In others, schools provide too much structure, and adults end up becoming authoritarian presences who stifle student engagement and self-discovery.

We do not need to choose. It is possible – indeed, essential – to find the right organizational balance between individual freedom and group structure. In fact, research confirms that when school leaders do so, they create optimal conditions for student learning, motivation and engagement.

Now, more than ever, our country needs these sorts of schools. We need schools that provide young people with well-structured spaces in which to discover who they are and what they care deeply about. We need schools where adults prepare students for active citizenship and the 21st century workplace. And we need schools to reinforce democratic practices that extend beyond the school’s walls, helping adults unite behind the shared belief that all children deserve to be seen and heard. But before that vision can become a reality, we must ensure that the central elements of our social covenant are also in place in our schools: a clear sense of structure and shared identity on one hand, and an unwavering commitment to individual freedom on the other. And that's a very specific leadership skill, and one that isn't necessarily a part of most training programs today.

In the work world, if we are lucky, we get to choose which tasks to do, not whether or not to do a task.  For example, Terri Gross, the host of Fresh Air on NPR gets to interview all sorts of interesting people.  She can choose who to interview, but she doesn¹t get to to choose whether or not to interview someone ­ she doesn¹t get to keep her job if she doesn¹t do something.  Some schools give their students a lot of liberty.  How does his much liberty prepare a person for much less of it in the work world?

In schools that don't have the right organizational balance between individual freedom and group structure, kids are sometimes not prepared well for the world beyond those walls. This is why it's so important for those of us committed to democratic practice to become experts in organizational change theory, systems thinking, etc. It isn't enough to just tell kids they have rights. Jim Collins has a good way to put this, even though he was talking about successful businesses. “Disciplined people who engage in disciplined thought and take disciplined action – operating with freedom within a framework of responsibilities – this is the cornerstone of a culture that creates greatness.” The same holds true for schools.

Without experience or much knowledge of the world about us, we don't know what we don't know.  How do you expose children to new ideas, other cultures, the history of the world, the wonders of the universe and still preserve their freedom to choose what they want to learn?

The learning process is the process of personal transformation. It's the chrysalis, the experience of developing the knowledge and skills to use one's unique voice, effectively and with integrity, in co-creating our common public world.

So the way you expose children to new ideas, cultures, and wonders is by aligning every aspect of your school to the shared goal of providing a healthy, high-functioning, supportive, relationship-driven culture of learning - one in which adults provide professional guidance and simple structures that help young people discover their passions and their inner voices. Once that is in place, the rest will take care of itself.

How does a Democratic school capitalize on the collective knowledge of our culture, for example our elders, our experts in a given field, our authors?
 
In short by creating a legitimate democratic learning community.

Myles Horton, the founder of the Highlander adult education schools that helped train activists like Rosa Parks, put it this way: “I think it’s important to understand that the quality of the process you use to get to a place determines the ends, so when you want to build a democratic society, you have to act democratically in every way. . . . When you believe in a democratic society, you must provide a setting for education that is democratic.”

Once such a culture is established, it's inevitable that the spirit of appreciative inquiry that is at the heart of democracy will ensure a steady stream of new ideas, opinions, experts, etc. This is because when we allow all voices to be heard, and when we engender a respectful exchange of ideas, we invite the creative power of “civil” friction. “One of the most reliable indicators of a team that is continually learning is the visible conflict of ideas,” Peter Senge explains. “In great teams conflict becomes productive. There may, and often will, be conflict around the vision. In fact, the essence of the ‘visioning’ process lies in the gradual emergence of a shared vision from different personal visions. . . . Conflict becomes, in effect, part of the ongoing dialogue.”

Identifying your own strengths, weaknesses, and interests comes from continually coming into contact with people, ideas and subjects, especially those previously unfamiliar to us.  How does a Democratic School provide this environment for self-knowledge?

C. Otto Scharmer, a senior lecturer at MIT and an expert in organizational learning, offers a useful metaphor for the deeper level of understanding and awareness you describe. Scharmer, who grew up on a farm in Germany remembers his father teaching him to see the fields they tilled with a wider lens. “Each field, he explained to me, has two aspects: the visible, what we see above the surface, and the invisible, or what is below the surface. The quality of the yield – the visible result – is a function of the quality of the soil, of those elements of the field that are mostly invisible to the eye.”

Scharmer believes we should see “social fields”  the same way. “Social fields are the grounding condition, the living soil from which grows that which only later becomes visible to the eye. And just as every good farmer focuses attention on sustaining and enhancing the quality of the soil, every good organizational leader focuses attention on sustaining and enhancing the quality of the social field – the ‘farm’ in which every responsible leader works day in and day out.”

Understood this way, the most “visible” aspects of a school culture are the things parents, educators and students do, say, and see. Trophy cases. School bathrooms. Test scores. Cafeteria food. Uniforms. Policies. All are important indicators of a school’s quality and commitment to young people. And because these cultural indicators are visible, they end up receiving the bulk of our attention.

By contrast, the “invisible” parts of a school culture are far more elusive – and essential – to the cultivation of a healthy learning environment. Scharmer describes these features as the inner conditions from which parents, educators and students operate with each other. Our hopes and fears. Our emotions. The quality of our relationships with each other. The issues we have informally agreed never to discuss.

These factors are the deepest determinants of a school’s success (or failure) at creating a high-functioning school. And yet precisely because they are invisible (and so much harder to work on), they tend not to factor into most school improvement plans.

The central challenge in any organizational culture, therefore, is to help people become more adept at different ways of seeing – and of being seen. “We need to learn to attend to both dimensions simultaneously,” says Scharmer. “What we say, see, and do (our visible realm), and the inner place from which we operate (the invisible realm, in which our sources of attention reside and from which they operate).”

Attending to both dimensions – and balancing individual and group needs – is an essential goal for any organization. When a school finds the right balance in its organizational culture, it encourages all people to discover the power and uniqueness of their own voices. It helps young people chart a navigable path on their ongoing journeys of personal development. It helps members of the school community foster more meaningful, trusting relationships with each other. And it turns the old maxim about young people on its head, by creating a learning environment based on the belief that all children deserve to be seen and heard.

Sometimes growth comes from doing things we don't like to do, or through continual practice or effort.  How does a Democratic School nurture important qualities like resilience, mastery, persistence and the like?

The short answer is it doesn't - unless the school is intentionally set up as a place that welcomes "civil friction," and an environment that prepares people to feel comfortable with the discomfort of competing ideas.

This idea is not new - it's the core idea behind the First Amendment. And at the heart of that spirit is a framework for civil friction that my former colleagues at the First Amendment Center call the “Three R’s”:

•    Rights: The First Amendment’s guarantee to protect freedom of conscience is a precious, fundamental and inalienable right for all. Every effort should be made in public schools to protect the consciences of all people.
•    Responsibilities: Central to the notion of the common good is the recognition that the First Amendment’s five freedoms (religion, speech, press, assembly, petition) are universal rights joined to a universal duty to respect the rights of others. Rights are best guarded and responsibilities best exercised when each person and group guards for all others those rights they wish guarded for themselves.
•    Respect: Conflict and debate are vital to democracy. Yet if controversies about freedom in schools are to reflect the highest wisdom of the First Amendment and advance the best interest of the nation, how we debate, and not only what we debate, is critical.

These are the ground rules of our democracy. Properly understood and applied, they are equally useful for our public schools.

Saturday, August 1, 2009

Chicago Arts Partnership in Education - Bringing Integrated Arts to Schools - an Interview with Amy Rasmussen















Amy Rasmussen is the Executive Director of Chicago Arts Partnership in Education (CAPE) and is responsible for financial management, marketing, and organizational planning. Amy joined CAPE in October 2000 CAPE after working with The Chicago Chamber Musicians for six years. Amy holds an M. A. in Arts Entertainment and Media Management from Columbia College and a B. A. in Music from DePaul University. She currently serves on the advisory committee for the Chicago Arts Learning Initiative. I caught up with Amy to ask her about CAPE.

What is the mission of the Chicago Arts Partnership in Education and what does it do for schools?

CAPE’s mission is to improve student learning through the arts by improving students’ creative capacity and critical thinking skills through the arts. CAPE’s primary strategy is to partner closely with teachers and schools. CAPE works collaboratively with teaching artists in Chicago and beyond to bring more ideas into the schools. We recognize that if this initiative is to be sustainable it must impact adults in the building and the system within which we all work, not just the kids. We provide support for educators, working with them on development and curriculum design. We have seen substantial growth with teachers’ capacity to serve as leaders in school. For example, traditionally arts teachers serve as preps teachers. They get kids for 40 minutes once a week for half the year. We work with teachers to help them develop their leadership skills. They become curriculum designers and integrators, and become professional development providers in their own building. With our approach there is inter-faculty collaboration and collaboration with teaching artists and arts organizations. Chicago is a major cultural capital, and everyone wants to work in schools and support arts education. This works best when teachers and principals know how to negotiate partnerships that will best serve the needs of the students, school and community.

How does music help to develop physical, intellectual, and emotional development?

I am an oboe and guitar player and, in my experience, music study and performance is a different way to think. It facilitates the use of a different part of the brain. Kids in school need to develop different ways of thinking. I know when I create music, I feel energized and creative long after I put the instrument down. There are countless anecdotes of kids not doing well in other subjects and then they pick up an instrument and it changes them. Music allows you to express in different way. Music definitely impacts social and emotional development. When you feel better and you have ownership of your capacities it correlates to better school performance.

Young children can gain exposure to music with singing and listening to songs. How early can children learn instruments?

I am a big advocate of early music – music education starts at birth! As early as age three, children can be encouraged to try an instrument or can be encouraged to listen to music or see a concert. The goal is not necessarily to develop a child prodigy, but to develop literacy in the broadest sense, recognizing patterns, developing language – in order to develop those pathways of thinking. It should not just be about listening; rather it should be actively creative.

There are many authors and innovators (Daniel Pink, Sir Kenneth Robinson, Richard Florida, to name a few) that are talking about creativity and imagination being among the most important qualities in our economic success going forward. How will music instruction play a part in that vision?

It’s huge! I think that our economy is totally tied to creativity and innovation. In order to train people to be creative and innovative they have to develop the kinds of skills that are taught through the arts. I think that kids need exposure to all kinds of contemporary art making, focused on concepts and big ideas. Art making shifts between the literary and the aesthetic to the conceptual and the abstract. People who are working in innovation and developing new businesses, products, or disciplines need to be able to move between all of those ways of thinking. They need to move between frameworks and concrete actions. When learning a piece of music, like a sonata from the very beginning it doesn’t quite make sense. At the beginning you are just getting fingers to go to the right notes at the right time. Later you get to the bigger concepts, like “what was the composer trying to say with this piece?” Later still you interpret the piece through your own lens. Not enough learning takes place in that way! Kids studying the arts learn the creative process and then create their own thing.

How does music help with balance in life?

Schools are becoming more aware of this issue and are endeavoring to exercise different parts of the brain. You physically feel different after playing music. It refocuses energy in a completely different way allowing you to go on and accomplish other things well afterwards.

We’ve seen erosion in arts education, including music in our nation’s schools. What has been the consequence of this?

Look at the economy. I think the public greatly underestimates the connection between decreased quality in school and the decreasing economy. The challenge is that increased quality in education does not have an immediate payoff – there is no immediate economic benefit, this is why it is so difficult for our political leaders to choose to invest in high-quality education. Hopefully, President Obama will inspire more long-term thinking in this area.

What can a school with a limited budget do to offer some form of music education?

In Chicago there is quite a music scene. There are six or seven universities with music programs and many people to teach and provide music. It requires leadership at school to find these resources and put it together in a cohesive way. Parents need to think about 24/7 education rather than 30 hours in school. While we all would love for each school to offer a comprehensive music education, we know that it is not always going to happen in the deepest, richest way. A parent should question what his or her child is getting in school and where else can s/he go to get more. There are community music schools and programs and local arts organizations. Parents can form groups to decide what they want to advocate for in their school. There is a school here that had a part-time music program and they wanted a full-time program, so they raised money for it. Is it the best way to get this in place or even ethical? I think it is the state’s responsibility, but the parents were motivated and inspired. There are resources available but it takes the leadership of parents and heads of schools to pull them together.

How can the arts integrated into a curriculum provide a context for learning history, science, math and other subjects?

CAPE’s approach to arts integration is a multi-faceted strategy that addresses students’ academic and social challenges. The organizing principle of CAPE’s model is the engagement of professional teaching artists who collaborate with classroom and/or arts teachers, as well as school leadership and parents to plan, document and implement arts-integrated learning opportunities for students. CAPE’s model of instruction begins with teachers’, teaching artists’, parents’, and students’ questions about learning. This methodology is inspired by Dewey’s theory of education, which holds that optimal learning and human development and growth occur when people are confronted with substantive, real problems to solve, and that curriculum and instruction should be based on integrated, community-based tasks and activities that engage learners in forms of pragmatic action that have real value in the world. The instructional process includes Inquiry, Documentation, Assessment, Evidence, and Reflection.

This inquiry approach to curriculum development creates common themes and ideas across networks of classrooms and schools, and creates opportunities for collaboration and sharing of successful practices. This process does not put in place a set of pre-designed activities, rather it creates a common approach for addressing curriculum content and standards, with ample freedom for creativity, and room for developing a wide-range of effective teaching strategies based on the needs of individual learners.

CAPE’s instructional methodology is based on its 17 years of practice and research on effective teaching and learning in and through the arts. CAPE’s achievements are documented in the landmark publication Champions of Change: The Impact of the Arts On Learning, released in 1999 as well as cataloged at www.capeweb.org

Some specific examples:
The Green Unit at Agassiz Elementary School focused on increasing students’ knowledge of renewable energy and empowering students toward social action through the visual arts. Students were given the opportunity to explore, investigate and develop strategies to improve environmental behaviors at school and at home. Students also investigated how we power our cities and developed ideas for changes. The curriculum included science experiments with plants, soil, energy, light, heat and electricity. Students toured Agassiz School with their school’s engineer for a hands-on experience of vocabulary words like “boiler,” “compressor,” “generator.” The students developed a collective visual project that incorporated many of the ideas of renewable energy and energy conservation; expressed through photography, collage, painting with watercolors. “SOLAR TOWN” was a miniature city installed on the front lawn of the school made of small solar-powered houses that stayed aglow through the nights. Students documented their own work throughout the unit with poetry wheels, journals and digital cameras. Students also created a questionnaire and mailbox as part of the installation and asked for feedback from neighbors and passersby.


In the “INVENTORS MEET THE MEDIA” unit, 4th grade students from Mark Sheridan Academy compared processes and character traits of both inventors and video artists through creating short films. The fine arts teacher worked with the fourth graders on camera technology, shots, angles and artistic expression with film. Students practiced with digital still cameras and eventually camcorders. Students then researched specific inventors and created biographies about the inventors’ lives and inventions. This research served as a springboard for the content of the student videos.

After initial shots, students watched the footage using a rubric they created to make decisions about what to change, what takes they wanted to cut and what effects were needed. The teachers and teaching artists also used this rubric to evaluate student performances, filming technique, and content/storyline, but also to determine how well the students were able to self-assess their work.

How can parents encourage a love and learning of music outside of school?

This is done by example. When parents get excited about it, the kids get it. Parents can provide the opportunities for learning and enrichment. My parents let me take any class or course I wanted. I experimented with all sorts of courses, like the arts, great books, and a computer class. Eventually something sticks. Be open to all of the possibilities and opportunities.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

The Renegade Lunch Lady - An Interview with Ann Cooper

Chef Ann Cooper calls herself the renegade lunch lady. She works to transform school cafeterias into culinary classrooms for students and change school districts’ policies on food spending in favor of foods that are fresh, regional, organic, seasonal and sustainable. Ann has revamped and reformed public school cafeterias in New York, California and now Boulder, Colorado, where I caught up with her recently to talk about her work.

What are the challenges of being a renegade lunch lady? Do you encounter a lot of resistance?

The challenges in Berkeley as well as Boulder are food, finance, human resources and marketing. For finance, it’s about having less than a $1.00 a day to pay for food for a child’s lunch and for facilities- what to do when there is no kitchen available. For human resources it is about how to get staff in place that knows how to cook, not just serve frozen chicken nuggets. And for marketing, how do you get the kids to eat it.


How does school lunch reform positively impact student health, behavior, motivation, and interest in learning?

Kids cannot learn if they are not well nourished. Adults and educators have known this forever, and in fact, that is how the school lunch program got started, because kids were hungry and couldn’t get through the school day without the food. Now our challenge is to feed kids good food. The obesity and diabetes crisis has exacerbated the whole thing.
Berkeley just finished a three-year study with UC Berkeley Center for Weight and Health, which will be coming out by beginning of 2010. For now, though, we know anecdotally that if kids are not well nourished they can't think, focus or behave. When you eliminate refined sugar and flour from their diet their behavior and focus improves dramatically.
Also, we now live in a country where two out of four meals are eaten in a car or in front of a screen. When do we socialize and sit down at a table and interact? We need to turn off the Wii, the iPhone, the computers, and the TV and actually communicate. That sense of vital growth and learning is lost if you don't have it at the table.

How can your work give students a sense of context or a frame of reference in the study of math and science?

Gardening and cooking classes give hands-on, experiential learning and it educates in all kinds of curricula. For example, when planting, how much organic compost do you need in so many yards of dirt? That’s practical math and it can easily relate in similar ways to science and other studies.


How do kids respond when allowed to grow or prepare their food?

Although kids are not involved in food preparation in the cafeteria, they do have cooking classes and gardening and they can eat the food they produce. Experiential learning is important. When kids get to have some power over their choices, it gives them a sense of importance and ownership over what is their food.


What does a kitchen look like in your ideal school and who is in it?

We don't have kitchens in all schools; we have centralized production kitchens. They look like real food service operations with equipment that is dedicated to cooking from scratch. The kitchens are staffed with skilled culinarians and other people that care about the preparation of food for kids.

How can parents and communities get renegade lunches for their students?

Every school district has a wellness policy starting in September of 2006. Ask to see that and then eat lunch in one of the schools to see if that policy is being followed. Get like-minded parents together to advocate for better food for our kids. Parents have tremendous power. They elect the school board members so they really can make a difference.

I think what is important is that we need to make changes. We will either pay now for quality foods or we will pay later in a health care crisis. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) has said that of the children born in the year 2000 one out of three Caucasians and one out of two Black and Hispanic people will have diabetes in their lifetimes, many by the time they graduate high school. They will be the first in our country’s history to die at a younger age than their parents. With all the money we spend on the war and corporate bailouts, we only spend $8.5 million on feeding 30 million kids, which is less than a dollar per student spent on food. When we live in a country where people spend $5 on their morning coffee, it seems reasonable to spend more on quality foods for children. That really has to change.

Monday, July 27, 2009

Education Focused on Today, not Tomorrow

Daniel Bigler is my guest blogger today. Daniel's blog can be found at http://www.danielsaurus.com/

I don't think ever before in our history as America have we rested so much or asked for so much from a single system. It's as if education, if only we could unravel its mysteries and at last get it right, will solve all of the problems of the future, problems whose prospects so horrify us today. We hold education high, with great expectations, and perhaps rightly so – its impact can be great, it's potential unlimited. Education can dramatically change what Tomorrow looks like. But with such promise comes a hefty burden – an encumbrance that comes in the form of the diligent many, with all their priorities to emphasize, proposals to make, suggestions to offer for education.
 
Alfie Kohn recently made a "simple proposal": http://www.alfiekohn.org/teaching/22century.htm of his own for crafting an Education that truly addresses our future as a society:
 
"Many school administrators, and even more people who aren’t educators but are kind enough to offer their advice about how our field can be improved, have emphasized the need for “21st-century schools” that teach “21st-century skills.” But is this really enough, particularly now that our adversaries (in other words, people who live in other countries) may be thinking along the same lines? Unfortunately, no. Beginning immediately, therefore, we must begin to implement 22nd-century education.

What does that phrase mean?  How can we possibly know what skills will be needed so far in the future?  Such challenges from skeptics – the same kind of people who ask annoying questions about other cutting-edge ideas, including “brain-based education” – are to be expected.  But if we’re confident enough to describe what education should be like throughout the 21st century – that is, what will be needed over the next 90 years or so – it’s not much of a stretch to reach a few decades beyond that."

 
Kohn jests, delightfully poking fun at much of the hyperbole surrounding the promise of education. But I'm afraid he's far too right in his underlying sentiment: In facing the future, I'm afraid we've become obsessed with fixes. With proposals. With plans.
 
There are too many – especially those wonderful civil servants making the decisions, in the upper-echelons of the American public education system who feel that it's their job to fix things and come up with all the answers. George W. Bush's "No Child Left Behind" initiative might have left our system wounded and our schools overwhelmed, but now the promises of a new start – a new beginning, with exactly what's needed to fix the system – are commonplace. We need more funding, more accountability, more planning. These are the solutions to fulfill the unfunded mandate of NCLB and rechristen education as the means for a golden future.
 
But in reality, these offer only limited hope because they still fail to address the real problem.
 
To discover the problem – and find the answer to it – I think we have to fundamentally reconsider the philosophy of the entire education system. What is the role of education in society and how has it changed throughout time? Why is it that our classrooms today remain fundamentally unchanged from the classrooms of the early 1900s
 
It's easy to forget the roots of the educational system we know today – roots that began in the late 19th and early 20th century. It was then that we saw American public education emerge as a systematic movement, predominantly out of an industrial age mindset to accommodate what were largely and exclusively economic purposes. At the time there was a fairly linear, predictable path of economic progression allowing us to reasonably, though not completely judge what the future workforce would need to be like to accommodate it. And we assumed we knew how to engineer a given set of educational experiences to fill the social "deficits" of children, to get them "ready" for this unforeseen future. Education was then – as best articulated by the sociologist Émile Durkheim, whose writings were popular at the time – a way to maintain social order and cohesion, allowing society to control its own evolutionary trajectory and continually improve upon itself.
 
But the world has changed, and changes still. Of that simple fact there is no doubt. I could argue that the world has always been in flux, never as fully within our control as we expect, and thus education – at least in the Durkheimian sense – has always been on some deeper level inherently flawed.
 
Yet today, despite the radically accelerating technological and global change happening breathlessly all around us, the sheer unpredictability of the future, and an ever-flattening globalized economy with impacts we can't imagine, we remain more intent than ever on using education to fix tomorrow.
 
Author and teacher Ken Robinson quietly articulated this in his 2006 speech at the TED conference. "It's Education that's meant to take us into this future that we can't grasp. If you think of it, children starting school this year will be retiring in 2065. Nobody has a clue ... what the world will look like in five years time and yet we're meant to be educating them for it. So the unpredictability, I think, is extraordinary."
 
If we know anything about the future, it's that we can't truly know it or predict it. And who are we to say that we can craft a "21st Century Education" to match this that we do not know?
 
 Robinson went on in his speech to make a compelling argument for the need for education to emphasize children's unique and extraordinary capacities for innovation and creativity – capacities he sees schools today as having done a remarkable job at squandering. Robinson believes, and rightly so I think, that "Creativity now is as important in education as literacy, and we should treat it with the same status."
 
Take away the expectations, the assumptions about the skill sets and knowledge children will need to be "ready" in for the future, the drive for a competitive edge in an unseen economy and we will be left simply with the children right in front of us and their natural creative capacity. Children, as we discover, are born with an insatiable spirit of inquiry and curiosity. The children in our classrooms now have an enormous ability for creative thinking, a keen willingness to make mistakes and to learn. It's only in our misguided efforts to ready kids and fill them with answers for tomorrow that they lose all these things.
 
What's truly ironic is that it is this creativity, this willingness to make mistakes that is at the heart of real economic innovation. We've educated it out of kids to satisfy the needs of the economy and society, but if it weren't for the outliers who escaped education's impact, we wouldn't have an economy or society today. We need to recognize this and choose to honor and respect children for their innate creative abilities by working with them to help develop these abilities. We need to let them ask questions, and spend our classroom time allowing them to explore their inquiries and think critically about every day problems and ideas they might be interested in. We need to build supportive communities around them, where children truly feel empowered to learn – where they truly feel they are valued as individuals and members of the community. We need to allow the world of the classroom to be oriented to their needs, and not some standard of the future.
 
Literacy and knowledge-building alone, implemented out of a desire to fill future deficits, will not prepare our children. To pay homage to John Dewey, education needs to align with the needs of each individual child – trusting in that child to serve as the system's center of gravity. Education needs to comes from those students in the classroom, rather than being systematically imposed on them from outside. We need a system oriented in the present instead of the future, an education that strengthens and upholds the creativity and curiosity children have today.
 
We need to pull education out of the future and put it back in the present. It's this philosophical shift, and this only, that will make the difference. A "21st Century Education" will always and continually fail, as long as it looks forward toward tomorrow. Only in meeting kids where they're at now and letting them explore the present can we help them truly develop the creative skills, love of learning, and spirit of innovation they'll need for the future.
 
That's my proposal for 21st Century Education.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

The Magic of Montessori - an Interview with Nichole Holtvluwer

Nichole Holtvluwer has a way with children. Her gift has benefitted many families at the Montessori Academy of Colorado where she is a Directress. I asked Nichole to share her thoughts on the theory and practice of the Montessori model of education.

How did you come to be a Montessori Educator? What led you down that path?

I discovered Montessori in the winter of 2001 when I was 20 years old and utterly confused as to what I should do with my life.  
One afternoon I opened up the  phone book to the “Childcare” section and called every school in Denver on the list.  The Montessori International Children’s House (TMICH) in Denver, CO happened to be the only place with positions open, and two week later I was hired on as an assistant in one of the toddler communities.  I recall my first week as torture and constant question about why I had say yes to the position.  Between toileting, lack of verbal communication and general chaos, toddlers, especially toddlers in a Montessori community, can be a challenge!  But the second week my eyes opened up to the beauty and intelligence of the young child and forever I was changed.  I was blessed with an amazing Directress who taught me all about the Montessori philosophy.  It was a true serendipitous event, and lead me to my life calling.

After TMICH closed down due to financial problems I decided to return to college to pursue my early childhood education, attending Metro State College of Denver.  Traditional education has never felt right for me, so after one semester I left Metro State and enrolled in the Association Montessori International Assistants to Infancy Course (Birth to Three Years) at the Montessori Institute of Denver studying under Judi Orion and Liz Hall.  Not only did I learn and embody just about everything there is to know about the human from conception to three years old, I also learned a great deal about myself and the world.  

I completed my Montessori training in 2004, and from there decided to take some time off and really get to know myself before becoming a Montessori Directress.  I did some traveling, left Denver for awhile, but always knowing that Montessori was a part of me.  Maria Montessori puts it best, saying, “It is not enough for the teacher to love the child.  She must first love and understand the universe.  She must prepare herself, and truly work at it. 

Feeling confident and ready to put my all into a community I was hired at Fiddler’s Green Montessori in Greenwood Village, CO in 2006 as the Toddler Directress.  Wanting more of a community feel at a school I left Fiddler’s Green and started work at the Montessori Academy of Colorado (MAC) in Denver, CO in 2007.   I am currently one of four Toddler Directresses at MAC, with 15 children in my community ranging in age from 16 months to 3 years old.   You will notice as you read on that I call it a “Montessori Community” rather than a “Classroom”. I feel deeply that Montessori is not only for the child, but also for all those who surround the child. Thus, a Community is what is being established. I have found my life calling through Montessori and feel blessed each day I walk into my Toddler Environment.  

While I am a “Montessorian” through and through, I also have my own take, as all educators do, on the philosophy and pull a great deal of my strength as an educator from the way I see the world and the way I see the child in the world. I feel deeply that we need to make a 180 degree turn in or educational system, and am doing all I can to facilitate that change.  As Maria Montessori said, "The child is much more spiritually elevated than is usually supposed.  He often suffers, not from too much work, but work that is unworthy of him.”

What is the history of Montessori?

Maria Montessori was truly a miraculous woman, who through her life journey developed the most comprehensive, honest and true form of education for children, especially children under the age of six years old.  

Through her observations of the child, she came to understand that it was not the adult who the child learned the majority from, but rather the environment they lived in.  The adult in the Montessori Environment is considered another material with which the child constructs himself, independently.  She came to this understanding after a great deal of education, struggle and experience. 

Maria Montessori began her medical studies of mental and nervous diseases at the University of Rome in 1883 with great difficulty.  Being a woman she was denied acceptance many times, but due to her persistence she eventually was accepted at the University where she became the first woman in Italy to receive a  Master’s Degree in medicine in 1896.  

Some of her first work was done in working with children in insane asylums.  It was there that she found that the children were starved for experience, recognizing that their minds were not useless, just unused.  

After continued studies, and her discovery of Jean-Marc Gaspard Itard and Edouard Seguin’s work with impaired children, Maria Montessori became convinced that education, not medicine, was the answer to helping children who were mentally impaired.  She believed that the human mind is made to work and know and can not help but take in information about the surrounding environment.  After seeing how well the impaired children whom she worked with learned, it lead Montessori to wonder how the same methods would work with children who were not impaired.  

Montessori decided to change her course of direction, and began to focus on working with “normal” children who were not medically defined as “impaired”.  Through her work with “normal” children, Montessori wondered how a bad mark in school could make a child clever?  She concluded from this that the teacher’s role is to help guide, enlighten and awaken.  She felt that the school is there to help, not judge.

At this time the Philanthropic Society of Rome was renovating a poor quarter of the city.  The young children of this area had no where to go during the day, so a place was set aside were the children could go.  Montessori was asked to set up an environment to help these children.  

On January 6th, 1907 the first Casa dei Bambini was started by Maria Montessori.  Montessori felt that if the children were to be happy here they must feel as though they belonged.  The children were given the opportunity and guidance to care for their environment.  Montessori had furniture made that was child-sized, along with the introduction of plants and flowers for the children to take care of.  She also introduced to the children the idea of caring for themselves through washing their hands, brushing their teeth, their hair, etc.  This gave the children a measure of independence from adults and through repetition the children were able to develop concentration and finally master the skill.  

The idea of allowing the children to choose their own work came about one day when the cabinet containing all the materials, which was always locked, was left open.  The children began to spontaneously choose their own work, without the assistance of the adult.  From this point, the materials were never locked up again, and low shelves were built so that the children had this continued opportunity of choosing work independently.  

The children began to show and convince Montessori that the child’s characteristics were different from their usual characteristics when they were given an environment that met their needs.  

A great deal of Montessori’s work came about during World War II when she and her son, Mario were put on house arrest in India because of their Italian passports.  India was ruled at the time by the British and considered Italy enemy ground.  Montessori had recently stood up to and refused Mussolini’s desire to nationalize all the Montessori schools in Italy, so no political asylum was granted for Montessori and her son to return safely to Italy.  

While in India Montessori and Mario lived on a compound/community of families where she spent most of her time observing the children of the community.  It was here that Montessori wrote the Absorbent Mind, became interested in the child under three, and also developed the elementary curriculum.  

In 1929 the Association Montessori International (AMI) was established to support Montessori’s work and ideas.  The headquarters are currently in Amsterdam, with a US branch in Rochester, NY.  

Maria Montessori ended her days in Holland after travel throughout the world to bring about a new form of education.  She strived for peace, with the goal to bring to the general public the importance of education for peace, saying that it is “the young child who possesses the possibility for the construction of a new humanity”.  In 1952, Maria Montessori passed away.  On her tombstone is written, “I beg the dear all-powerful children to unite with me for the building of peace in Man and in the World.”  

How does a Montessori classroom look and feel compared to a traditional classroom?

The main difference between a Montessori community and a traditional classroom is that in the Montessori Community the aim is to always “Follow the Child” rather than “Follow a Set Curriculum”.  One of the ways that a Montessori program does this is by breaking down each community into mixed age groups, called the Montessori Age Groups:

Nido (Italian for “nest”): 6 weeks to 16 months
Toddler: 6 months to 2.5 - 3 years
Primary:2.5 - 3 to 6 years
Lower Elementary: 6 - 9 years
Upper Elementary: 9 - 12 years
Adolescence: 12 - 15 years
High School: 15 years

Montessori programs for high school students are rare, not only in the US, but around the world.  It was Maria Montessori’s hope that a child who had grown up with the Montessori philosophy would enter a traditional high school and college with ease.  There are some high schools in the US following Maria Montessori’s philosophy. 

This mixed age range allows for each child not only to work at their own pace, but also gives the older children the opportunity to give lessons and help teach the younger children in the community.  By following the child, we are seeing each child as they are, not where we think they should be.  It is less determined by their specific age, but instead their individual growth.    

As Montessorians, we see each child as an individual and thus allow for that individual to construct herself through the prepared environment that has been set up for them by the adult.  As a Directress it is my mission to prepare an environment that is full of beautiful, natural, developmentally appropriate materials that will literally “call to the child” from the shelf to aid in their development. The children in a Montessori community are free to choose whatever they would like to work with, as well as receive lessons from a trained Directress on materials within the environment that will aid to the child’s growth of independence, and the integration of the will, movement, and intellect.  

Many people opposed to the Montessori philosophy see the child as free to do whatever they so choose.  While this is true, the children of the community also have limits to the freedom they are allowed.  With too much freedom, a child feels abandoned, and with too many limits a child feels restrained.  Montessori strives for a balance between the two: freedom AND Limits. 

Unlike a traditional classroom, children in a Montessori community do not work from individual desks, but are free to work at a table or on a rug placed on the floor. 

As I touched on earlier, the language in a Montessori community is always directed in a positive light.  For example, if the child is standing on a chair, rather than telling the child to get down a Montessorian will simply tell the child that chairs are for sitting in.  The results of working in a positive environment, one that is filled with “I Can!” changes the entire mentality of the community.  Children who develop in an environment filled with positive reinforcement in turn absorb that positivity into their daily life.    

Through her observations of children, Maria Montessori learned not only to follow the child, but also saw that preparing an environment where the child is set up to succeed resulted in a group of children who were confident, eager to learn and joyful with their surroundings. 

What are the advantages and disadvantages of having the mixed ages in a classroom over the course of three years?

One of the most difficult tasks of any Montessorian, whether it be an infant directress or an elementary directress, is observing the child and knowing what task to lead them into to aid in their development.  It can be quite difficult to pinpoint the exact task, at the exact moment for the exact child.  This is the goal of any educator, and something that only comes after years of purposeful observation.  

With a mixed age range, this task grows ever more difficult.  Especially when there is a child wanting to work with a material that is above and beyond his developmental capacity.  Maria Montessori saw this, and through her development of materials for the community, found that each set of materials could be worked with, by each age, in different ways.  While a 3 year old may find great joy and development in the shape and sound of a letter, a 6 year old will then in turn write a sentence using that letter.  And while a 2 year old may only be able to open and close a pair of scissors, the 3 year old can then cut paper using those same scissors.  So through Maria Montessori’s countless hours of observation, and development of materials, she saw that each item could be used to aid in the development of the child, at whatever age and ability level they are at.

What I personally love the most about the mixed age group in a Montessori community is the growth of the child.  The child enters the community like a foreigner, trying to find her footing, unknowing of the routine, and basically alone.  While the child typically finds refuge in the adult at first, it is the older children who pave the way from the new, young child. 

 I’ll never forget a little boy, Charlie, who started in my community at 18 months.  Charlie had never been in group care, and was totally freaked out by the experience at first.  Charlie bonded with me at first, and came to me for comfort when he was feeling overwhelmed.  As he found his footing, my oldest child at the time, Nate, took Charlie in and began to show him around the community, give him lessons, showed him how to set the table for snack, etc.  At 2.5 years, Nate was guiding Charlie through the community.  Charlie looked up to Nate and would speak of him at home.  In turn, Nate took on a leadership role, sharing his knowledge of the community, which in turn was aiding to the development of his confidence.    

How do you handle the more energetic children in your classroom with dignity and yet still bring order?


The first understanding of the energetic child is discovering where all this energy is coming from and having compassion for the child who wants and needs to move in order to construct their being.

Often the energy of the child is stemming from the lack and ability of  natural movement.  Our society has designed all these contraptions to “contain” the child.  For the young child there is the crib, being swaddled, the walker, bouncy seat, high chair, etc.  The lack of movement is appearing now in a new generation of children who are babysat by a television or video games, which is a “container” of sorts.  While these containers make an adults life easy, they are a detriment to the child, who needs to move in order to learn.  A child learns best through the exploration of the environment.

The second understanding of the child who is overly energetic is learning about his diet.  Sugar and wheat products greatly heighten a child’s energy level, unknowingly to the child.  Many children are fed high levels of sugar and wheat for breakfast in the form of cereal bars, cereal, oatmeal, fruit cups, etc.  Low-sugar, gluten-free food greatly helps the child with extra, uncontrolled energy. That being said, some children are naturally energetic.  These are the children who are constantly moving, even when focused on a task.  These are the children who need hands on, gross motor activities.

In a Toddler Community the children with high energy are directed into materials that will stimulate that energy, but focus it into a developmentally appropriate activity.  So, if I have a child who is very high energy I am going to lead the child into work with mud clay where their hands are really working to create, or cloth washing, where the child has to move throughout the environment to gather water across the room many times, fill tubs with that water, and then scrub with soap on a washboard, using all of their energy to do so.  These are purposeful activities where the child can use that energy to develop concentration and focus.  Time outside to run and play freely is also a great benefit for not only the highly energetic child, but all children.    

There are times however where the highly energetic child is disturbing the other children involved in focused work.  When this happens, it is the responsibility of the adult to explain to the child, using kind, honest language that they are being unfair and disrespectful to the children working.  Adults sometime forget to simply explain to the child why their behavior is inappropriate.  Just saying to a child, “NO!” or “Find something to do” does not benefit the child.  A simple reminder to calm down, or to take a deep breath can work wonders. 

Young children are excited for life!  The worst thing an adult can do with an energetic child, or any child for that matter, is stifle that eagerness for life and experience.       

How does Montessori acknowledge different learning styles and intelligences and then work with them?

Through observation of each child a Montessorian acknowledges all the different learning styles and intelligences.  There is no blue-print on how children learn, because each child is internally creating an original, one-of-a-kind “map of existence”.   The well trained and dedicated Montessorian knows this, and thus creates individual learning plans for each child.  This is the beauty of “following the child”.  There is no one way to do it in a Montessori Community and as long as the child is being respectful, each material is designed to engage the child in his/her own personal experience.      

Through constant observation of the child, the adult begins to see developmental pathways for the child.  It is these pathways that the adult then directs the child through.  For example, a child who is eager to paint, or draw, or sculpt with clay, the adult will see this and in turn work on language and counting through this passion for art.  Or a child who is obsessed with books, the adult will then use the books to work on sharing, reading to others, discussion, etc.  Each material is designed to expand on the child’s knowledge.  A book is not just a book, it is a tool for learning so much more.  The same goes for each material in the community.

There is no one-size-fits-all model of education. What kind of students do well in a Montessori setting and what kind do better elsewhere?

It is difficult to say there is a “one-size-fits-all model” for education, when Montessori is done right, I feel passionately that is does in fact fit all children.  Because the environment is designed for the individual, specific needs are met on a daily basis.  Where in traditional education, each child is learning and required to progress at the path of the class, in the Montessori environment each child is learning at their own pace and in their own individual way.  It is rare to see a child who does not succeed and really do well in a Montessori environment.  

That being said, there are many different levels to a “Montessori Educator” and many different levels of Montessori training.  Unfortunately for those Montessorians who have gone through a comprehensive training program, there are those who get a lack-luster education as to the Montessori Method.  The Montessori Method is not trademarked, so really anyone out there can call themselves a “Montessorian”.

It is also true that some adults do not comprehend the important role they play in a child’s life.  This has nothing to do with the Montessori Method, but rather the adult who is running the community.  This is not just limited to Montessori, but to all forms of traditional and non-traditional education.  

What makes the Montessori Method work and come to life for the child is the adult who is establishing the community.  The core of Montessori will always work and benefit the child, but only if it is done with true compassion, constant observation, passion for the life of the child, humility, and the awareness of the world around.       

What is the magic of Montessori?

The magic of Montessori does not reside in the method, is resides in the child.  What Montessori does is allow for that magic to be nourished and embraced.     Maria Montessori said herself that, “Montessori is an approach to education, a system of guidance that does not proscribe, instead it permits.  Montessori permits the talent that every person possesses, whatever it happens to be, to be discovered and developed.”

Monday, July 20, 2009

A Beautiful Marriage of Open/Democratic Education and Public School Accountability - an Interview with Scott Bain of Jefferson County Open School

In the signature block of Scott Bain's email is a quote by John Dewey: "Education is not preparation for life; education is life itself." This quote is very much congruent with the methods and mission of Jefferson County Open School, where Scott is the Assistant Principal. Located in Lakewood, Colorado, the school is based on the Open or Democratic model, yet is a public school. Scott has worked as an Advisor, teacher and Instructional Coach at the Open School for the past ten years. A self-proclaimed education geek and passionate advocate of open education, he recently spared some of his summer to share with me the qualities that make this school an exceptional public school.

What makes Jefferson County Open School so different from the average public school?

The most noticeable element is that no one is anonymous here. There is a sense that you are part of a community and that you are part of something bigger. In our community there is a strong sense of connection which includes students, parents and staff.

While it has become a popular phrase in conventional schooling, JCOS is truly a “student-centered” program – there is no other public school as student-centered as JCOS. While there are other programs that provide elements of a Jefferson County Open School experience, none trust and support students to guide their own education the way JCOS does. No two students have the same curricular experience here.

We also “teach to the whole child” in a real sense. The program is defined by an equal emphasis on the personal, social and intellectual growth of each student. Our Graduation Expectations require that students demonstrate progress in each of those domains.

In his book Cultural Literacy, E.D. Hirsch argues that content trumps process and those who are unfamiliar with a given set of facts would be unable to participate in our society. At JCOS, we feel that teaching students how to learn is more important than pure content or facts. We are not as concerned with filling the blank slate, rather we work to instill a passion for learning so that students are interested in and capable of finding information for themselves. Our practice embodies axiom; the literate of the 21st century will be those who can learn, unlearn and relearn.
What is the goal of education, according to JCOS?

Everything we do at JCOS is driven by the Five Goals of the school. Originally conceived by Arnie Langberg, founding principal of Mountain Open High School, the Five Goals are the criteria which we at JCOS would like our work to be evaluated. Students will be able to: 1.) rediscover the joy of learning, 2.) seek meaning in life, 3.) adapt to the world as it is, 4.) prepare for the world as it might be, and 5.) create the world as it ought to be. A detailed analysis of how our alumni have integrated the Five Goals into their lives can be reviewed in Fredrick Posner’s forthcoming book, Lives of Passion, School of Hope, scheduled for publication this September.

How do you maintain a sense of autonomy and philosophical integrity yet are still part of a large traditional school district?

In my opinion, our relationship with the Jeffco School District has improved since Wendy Wheaton became our principal. She came to us with experience in the district and quickly became a liaison and advocate for the program. There are many people within the district that value and support what we do. However, there are some at the district level who don’t really understand us.

In working with the district and the community at large there is an interesting balance which must be struck. The pure open or free model of education has evolved throughout the years at JCOS. In his book Summerhill School, A.S. Neill describes a much more laissez faire style of education. While JCOS is still influenced by some of Neill’s ideals, we have continued to change in order to maintain a viable and sustainable program in the high stakes world of accountability. As a public-based open school, I believe we have managed the changes in a way that actually gives us the best of both worlds. It is still very much student-centered learning, but we also employ student goals, Graduation Expectations, and Self-Directed Learning work to create a balanced approach to learning.

I like how you refer to your teachers as advisors and facilitators. This connotes a positive relationship that enables a balance of independence and guidance. Can you describe what classrooms look like at various levels?

At JCOS all Advisors go by their first names. Some think that calling someone by their sir name is a sign of respect, but we believe that learning is not hierarchical; rather it is a cooperative process where Advisor and student share equally. Therefore, we believe it is a sign of respect to the student that we are all learners and all equals at JCOS. There shouldn’t be that much separation between students and teacher – we want to foster tighter relationships without anonymity.

At the elementary level advising ratios are approximate 22 to 1 and at secondary level they are approximately 16 to 1. From first grade to graduation, Advisors work with students and their families in three year increments. Advisors get to know the students and their families’ well, which enables them to help students design their own curriculum. As students progress through the program there is a gradual release of responsibility from teacher to student directed learning. As students assume control of their education, it is fundamental that they have the support of an Advisor who knows the student well enough to help them design a meaningful and challenging curriculum. Most schools don’t include students in the development of curriculum; this job is usually reserved for district level administration. Empowering students in designing their own education requires a strong personal relationship with an Advisor.

Advising is also an integral part of creating a caring culture. Discipline is most often handled through meetings and positive dialogue with the Advisor. Rather than relying on detentions or punitive actions, we emphasize a trusting relationship with the Advisor. The more trust established with an advisor, the more freedom a student receives in order to achieve the goals of his or her curriculum. Trust is integral as a student’s curriculum often includes apprenticeships, internships, and domestic and international travel. If trust is eroded, freedom is diminished and must be earned again.

I know that classrooms with multi-age groupings are beneficial for a number of reasons. Can you describe the benefits?

One of the biggest benefits is the mentoring relationships that are developed between the students. The older students help teach the culture and norms of the classroom to younger students in a much more effective way than a teacher working alone can. The peer-to-peer teaching and learning is a great benefit to all students. Additionally, as Advisors get to know the students over three years, a nurturing atmosphere and an optimal learning environment is created.

How does your school honor the theory of Emotional Intelligence and multiple intelligences? For example, how would kids with different interests and talents in art, music, drama, gymnastics, history, math, etc. all thrive at your school and find their element?

At the elementary level there is choice time every day for the students to choose what they would like to do. It becomes more formalized in the Intermediate Area (4th through 6th grades) with their first self-directed learning projects, called Voyages. In Pre-Walkabout (7th through 9th grades) there are multiple Self-Directed Learning (SDL) projects and a Demonstration of Readiness, which is a transition curriculum and project that occurs during the 9th grade year. It is Open School 101 and is an orientation to the Passage process in Walkabout Program (10th through 12th grades). Walkabout, which was inspired by an Australian rite-of-passage, is the final phase of the program in which each student demonstrates readiness to function as an adult by doing six Passages, the actual transition to adulthood.

There are six focus areas to Passages: Adventure (A personally meaningful challenge or quest), Career Exploration (A broad investigation of a field of employment), Creativity (The development of a product of personal excellence), Global Awareness (Research, service learning, and education of others on an issue of global and local importance), Logical Inquiry (An investigation demonstrating an understanding of the scientific method), and Practical Skills (Development of skills for which one was formally dependant on others).

Students pick what they are interested in pursuing within these six Passages. One student who was interested in music built his own guitar, learned how to mix and record music, wrote and sang his own songs on a CD he learned to record. Another student interested in aviation got his pilot’s license through the Passages. Some students interested in drama have written, produced and acted in their own plays all as part of their Passages. Therefore, the theory of multiple intelligences and respect for one’s interests is built right into the Open School’s philosophy.

How are students’ work and progress assessed?

The Open School is a ‘non-graded’ school. Students do not track their progress using grades, nor is ‘seat time’ used to determine credit earned. Instead, students self-assess completion of each learning experience based on personal goals and Advisor criteria; feedback is given on their evaluations; these documents then go into a portfolio, which is the Open School Body of Evidence used to track progress on our Graduation Expectations rubrics. Our Graduation Expectations require that student’s demonstrate progress in the personal, social, and intellectual domains. Additionally, students complete the six Passages, twice-yearly self-reflections, coursework, participation in service projects or internships, and independent study plans.

The Passages and Self-Directed Learning Projects are truly an authentic assessment. Students must write up a narrative of their proposed course of study or Passage. In the proposal they describe what their goals are, what they want to accomplish, what they think they will learn, etc. They meet with their advisor and a community member/consultant who is generally an expert on the proposed subject matter (like a pilot for someone interested in aviation for instance) and a Triad, which is a group of their peers that are with them for 3-6 years. Once the proposal has been formalized, the student works on each Passage for anywhere from one month to three years, meeting with members of the original team along the way. At the end there is the wrap-up which is another narrative document that discusses what was originally proposed, what was learned along the way and how.

For more information on Jefferson County Open School go to: jeffcoweb.jeffco.k12.co.us/high/jcos

Thursday, July 16, 2009

College in Colorado: Making Higher Education Available for All - an Interview with Dawn Taylor Owens

Dawn Taylor Owens began her tenure as Executive Director of College In Colorado for the Colorado Department of Higher Education in February of 2006. In this role, she leads a statewide initiative, including outreach, marketing and advertising, partnership cultivation and Website services, to help Colorado students pursue higher education opportunities. Taylor Owens is regularly asked to speak on both political and non-political topics throughout the state, on issues critical to education, as well as critical issues facing the West. A Wyoming native, Taylor Owens was raised in Laramie and currently resides in Denver. She is a graduate of The University of Wyoming with a degree in Broadcasting and Communications. She resides in Denver with her husband Jim, and their two boys, Harlan (5) and Taylor (2).

What is the mission of College in Colorado and how does it work?

College in Colorado was initiated to help Coloradans find a way to access higher education past the high school level without regard to grades, ability to pay, and language barriers. With the many tools and resources it provides, it assists those that wouldn’t normally have easy access to a college degree. The organization helps those who want to have post secondary education to figure out how to plan, apply for, and pay for it, including finding grants, loans or scholarships. They also help find the right college based on your needs and interests, set up coursework plans, and even find jobs.

Why is it important to help more students gain access to higher education?

We talk to students who have never before considered going to college about the importance of getting a college degree in ways that they can understand. We tell them that they will earn $1,000,000 more over their life time than without a degree. They will earn, on average $60,000 per year instead of $20,000 per year without a degree. This is very meaningful and important to them.

There are many students for which college has never been thought of as an option. There are no college graduates in their families. These students will now have not only access to a tool that will help them into college, but encouragement to consider doing so. For these students, it becomes very empowering to show them that a 2-year degree in nursing will get them $50,000 a year and a flexible schedule. It changes everything for them.


You mentioned some amendments that recently passed that make access to CollegeinColorado.org a requirement. Tell me about that.

One amendment that passed, the School Finance Act requires all 6th graders to have an account with CollegeinColorado.org that every student can use the tool and those students who have no other resources or encouragement will really benefit from it.

The other amendment mandated that all districts provide an ICAP (Individual Career and Academic Plan) to each student, and it is clear that CollegeInColorado.org is the only tool that meets all of the requirements in the amendment. The ICAP helps students create coursework plans for secondary and post secondary education based on their interests. It provides a clear path for students to work toward as they proceed toward their career goals. It makes school and career become purposeful and goal oriented rather than happenstance.

How many students has your organization helped?

Over 250,000 students have active accounts. This is out of a possible 414,000 students, so more than half before the mandate was even in place.

What other services does CIC offer?

We have an outreach program that trains the trainers. We educate counselors on how to use the website so that they can show students how to set up an account for themselves. This website has enabled counselors to provide resources for career path and college preparation for students who need them while at the same time being able to devote more time for critical needs, like counseling to kids in trouble. The counselors average over 400 students to 1 counselor so many students who need much more than career and college resources were not able to see an overburdened counselor. This has helped tremendously with that problem.

There is a Team College in Colorado that educates students on the choices they can make for themselves and advocates for the college route. The man who does it, Lance Carl is a former football player who had a difficult upbringing, being orphaned at an early age and the only person of color for miles around. He talks to kids about making choices and uses his story as an example. He was interested in football as a young kid and started dabbling in deviant behavior with other boys. He made the conscious decision to choose football and planned his life accordingly. His brothers chose lives of deviance and have faced lives much different than that of Lance, including incarceration.

How has “education inflation” affected your organization and those you help?

It used to be that a bachelor’s degree was exceptional, now it has become the bare minimum. President Obama has stated the goal that every person in the United States has at least 1 year of education after high school. It is necessary in this global economy to have 21st century skills to be able to compete for jobs.

I noticed that you have some really great tools on your website, including a campus matching program, a comparison of colleges and virtual tours. Another is the Counselor Center. What other tools are there?


Starting in 7th grade, a student can enter in topics of interest and a career finder will show the possible careers associated with those interests and a plan to get there. It provides course work plans and even facilitates applying online for more than 8000 colleges. There are tools for career exploration, earnings calculators, and regional and national outlooks for the jobs. There is what is called a slope calculator that helps to determine in the maximum amount of student loans you should take out based on future income to ensure that your payments aren’t too budensome. There are resources to funding college. Anything you need to plan for college and careers will be found on the website.

To see and use the tools, go to http://www.collegeincolorado.org

Monday, July 13, 2009

Distracted - An Interview with Maggie Jackson on Attention

Maggie Jackson is the Boston Globe “Balancing Acts” Columnist and the author, most recently of and “Distracted: The Erosion of Attention and the Coming Dark Age” (Prometheus, 2008). Distracted explores our constantly hurried, multi-tasking world and its impact on our ability to pay attention, focus, cultivate human contact, and reflect. I asked Maggie to share more about her work on this book.

What inspired you to write Distracted?

I began thinking that I was going to write a book on technology so did a lot of research on that. The first high tech revolutions were during the 18th and 19th centuries. I explored the invention of the cinema, the phonograph, the railroad, and the telephone, and how we adapted to them, looking for clues on how we could better use our gadgets today. But I found that they were not separate revolutions or changes. These first technology revolutions sparked changes to time and space that we are still grappling with today. It is helpful to look far back into time to understand how our technologies are changing us. The idea of virtuality began in the time of the telegraph. The idea of a global village started with ships, cars, the railroad. It did not just come upon us a few years ago as we think of it. I had an epiphany that the issue was attention. All of these changes to time and space have affected our attention. That is how the book got started. It is an historical view of our technology and the science of our attention. Why do we multi-task? Why are we so wedded to our Blackberries? Why as a culture do we think we need to be available all of the time? The book explores these questions and their implications.

Please talk about the three pillars of attention.

Attention is fascinating and has been an enigma to scientists for hundreds of years. It is a human faculty that is not thought about much. Scientists began to discover that attention is an organ system, akin to our digestive or circulatory systems, in that parts of the brain and body work in complex alignment to perform the feat of attention. As well, attention isn’t just one thing as we would assume. There are three types of attention. One is focus, which is the spotlight of your mind. We use focus to relate to others or problem solve. A second type of attention is awareness or alerting. That’s akin to wakefulness or sensitivity to one’s surroundings. You can be focused on me but be half asleep, so these are related but separate types of attention! The third type of attention is executive attention, which is a package of higher order skills involved in judgment and decision-making, used in tasks such as writing a will, pondering an ethical problem or planning vacation.

While technology has helped make our lives easier in many ways, it also makes it more difficult. What a paradox! How is that so?

The key to understanding this paradox is abundance. We can connect with people anytime, anywhere, but the “always on” nature of this connectivity and sheer breadth of the connections makes it difficult to go deeply into the relationships. Similarly, we have so much data at our fingertips, yet do we go deeply? Are we turning information into knowledge and wisdom? To gain depth in relations or knowledge, we need time to think, to connect, and we need the discipline and effort to do so. We are humans, not machines. We cannot click or compute wisdom or intimacy.

How can we encourage more focus and stronger attention in our students?

Attention is a stepping-stone; it is how we interact with the world. As teachers know, attention is crucial at school. Our collective challenge is to create a culture that values attention and focus, not just tidbits of focus and snippets of data. Our schools and communities have to work toward the goal of creating focus and awareness in the best ways. First of all, it is important for parents, teachers, and students to put this issue on the table. Talk about the cost and benefits of multi-tasking, when and where it is useful or beneficial. Filling out college applications with 12 active windows on the screen may not be wise. It is fragmenting attention. We need to talk about this issue.

Second, we need to reconsider the value systems related to attention in our culture. In schools, the first hand raised in the classroom is considered the smart kid. It’s the impulsive thinker who’s often praised, rather than the slower, more thoughtful listener. As well, what is the marker of success in the corporate world? An executive running flat out, madly multitasking, not able to carefully listen. We need to rethink that. Public spaces like airport and doctor’s offices are noisy, screen filled spaces. We need to rethink our values in order to recapture focus and step away from an attention-deficient society.

In order to create what I call a renaissance of attention, we also need to individually nurture people’s powers of focus. We should be teaching children that attention is a skill set that takes hard work to build. We need training for attentional athletes! You don’t get to Wimbledon without practice and guidance and the same is true to become a focused, attentive individual. One Canadian researcher, Adele Diamond, helps toddlers learn to focus and listen by having them tell each other stories – with the listener holding an ear, and the storyteller holding a mouth. These props are physical reminders to pay attention. In classrooms across the country, many teachers are adopting Buddhist mindfulness practices. For instance, teachers ring a bell to prompt a moment of reflection or stillness during the day. Michael Posner, perhaps the greatest attention neuroscientist advocates that attention should be part of our pre-school curriculum.

Connection can refer not only intimacy but connectivity in terms of integration of many seemingly disparate subjects. How can closer human relations and perceiving connectivity among various subjects help students learn?

These are separate but important aspects of learning and attention. Closer human relations are absolutely core to learning, and core to being human. So much of what we are faced with today, with the speed of life, the changes around us, and role of machines in our lives, prompts us to question, what does it mean to be a human? What kind of relations do we want with each other? How can we adapt to a crowded, technological planet? Fragmented moments liked Twitter do not do justice to learning or relationships. Deep connectivity is all about paying attention to one another as part of rich educational experience. Kids are averaging six hours of exposure to non-print media a day. Half of kids six and under live in a home where the TV is on most of the time. Kids are faced with an environment that undermines their ability to pay attention.

Another skill built from attention is pattern-making, or the ability to take an inter-disciplinary perspective. Hypertext allows us to make an associational journey of learning; on the Net we hopscotch across information. And that is beneficial, but easily leads to skimming. In contrast, pattern-making or critical thinking is a deeper, more difficult process of building connections. It involves uncertainty and discomfort and will power – and is the building block of creativity and wisdom. We can’t let Internet learning – i.e. research based on what’s first up on google – substitute for this more difficult type of cognition.

Connectivity in learning also entails keeping a big-picture perspective. Walter Ong once wrote, “to know something as fully as possible, we need to be close to it…and we need at the same time to be distanced from it, to have it ‘in perspective’ an object notably distinct from ourselves.” What I think he is trying to say with this quote is that there is an overarching meta-cognitive aspect to learning. The Intenet, Googling, Twitter, and Facebook, don’t always allow a big picture perspective.

How do conventional schools further exacerbate attention problems?


A good school today is a school that uses technology wisely. We don’t need to ban it but we do need to use it wisely. In many ways, we have gone overboard in adopting tech tools in schools. The mantra has been, ‘If it is technological and new, it must be good.’ We are lovers of the new, the fast and the efficient. We have adopted technology in our lives and schools without question, thinking we must be better for it, but we’ve learned hard lessons in doing that. We need to do better at using the technological tools wisely and having a thoughtful place for them.

Hurrying children through the day needs to be rethought. It is not uncommon to have very little time for eating. Many kids get 10 minutes for lunch in schools and sometimes clubs meet during lunch so they are not eating. This is ignoring our human need for social time to eat together, and our need for time to reflect on what we’ve learned. We need to refuel, and not with a Power Bar.

How can parents model focus, attention, and intimacy for our children?

Giving the gift of attention to kids is the most important thing you can do. Teaching attention is to role model attention. Remember that what you attend to is what you deem worthy of your attention. If you come to the school play and fiddle with your gadgets, what message are you giving your child about respect – for the performers or for other audience members? If you are at the dinner table taking phone calls, allowing a family exchange to become a Swiss cheese moment, what is the message you are conveying? If we can stop and listen and truly pay attention to our children, we’ll be teaching them to relate well to others and helping them learn to focus at the same time.

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Waldorf's Approach to Teaching Math, Reading, and More - An Interview with Tracey Buchanan


Tracey Buchanan received her Waldorf Teaching Certification through Rudolf Steiner College in Sacramento, CA, where she was chosen by her class as Graduate Representative. She has been a Class Teacher since 2005, and has assisted in Waldorf classrooms and early childhood programs since 2003. Before her involvement in Waldorf Education, Tracey spent over ten years in individual and formal study of the Gaelic language speaking cultures of Scotland and North America: working, going to University, and living in the Nova Scotian Gaidhealtachd. She taught classes in Celtic Folk Life at Colorado Free University from 2001-2003, when she turned her attentions to the excitement of the Waldorf classroom. She and her husband James live in Denver with their two children: son Breandan, and daughter Peig. Tracey was kind enough to give me some of her summer time to interview on the subject of Waldorf education.

How does Waldorf teach literacy? Why this pace?

Waldorf education arrives at literacy through the imaginative pictures and highly complex vocabulary found in fairy tales, folk tales, legends, and through a profound intimacy with spoken rhyme and meter. The children become deeply familiar with the pictures and paces of the language itself to begin with, developing into an intense connection to the letters of the alphabet and the sounds they make. In Waldorf Education, the teacher herself must have a respectful relationship with speech and be conscious of the mystery of speech's evolution into writing and reading and what that signified for the evolution of mankind. This tacit understanding brings to the children a like respect for language that, in the best circumstances, is light and happy.

Once a love for speech is cultivated and other passages of physical development have been obtained, the child will demonstrate a healthy urge to unravel the reading question. This happens at a different time for each individual child, and to push them before they are ready compromises the relationship the child will have towards reading or even co-opt the social urge which is so vital in the developing 1st grader. These are a couple of the reasons why Waldorf educators will bring conscious reading very slowly in 1st grade and always in an imaginative way. The seeds for great reading skills are planted in the Waldorf Kindergarten through physical integration through play and in developing the child's listening skills.

If a love of speech has been cultivated and the child has passed the stages of physical development needed to arrive at the "quest" for reading and this does not happen, we know to observe the child to determine if there are other factors at work possibly blocking the ability to read. In a healthy Waldorf school, the Class Teacher already knows what challenges the children in his or her class are facing through in depth assessments brought by experienced support teachers before 1st grade and again during the 2nd grade year. He or she will have already incorporated remediating activities based on the class' needs into the rhythmic portion of the day, known as circle time.The teacher's eye for observation plays a major role as reading difficulties manifest mainly in the child as problems with actual physical integration. Perhaps the sense of balance (vestibular) is off on a particular child, or their sense of where they are in space (proprioceptive) is in need of further development. In some cases, retained reflexes from infancy due to lack of floor time, birth circumstances, or other factors can manifest as social or learning challenges.

Because Waldorf education is in itself therapeutic by addressing the needs mentioned above, many of the challenges presented by a child will be "worked through" in 1st grade, leaving 2nd grade open and clear for deliberate academic development. Typically, a child who has the desire to read and cannot will experience some frustration. This is a major indicator that the child needs extra support. Depending upon the school, reading support for the child in need could be referred for help anytime from 2nd -4th grade, based on the observations of the teacher.

Rarely are children referred to reading help in 1st grade, as premature reading compromises the cultivation of necessary social skills which have a window of blooming in the 1st grade. They can be referred to a support teacher to further strengthen areas upon which reading is dependent such as the vestibular and proprioceptive skills mentioned above. Reading is introduced slowly in the 1st grade so rarely is there any frustration from the child who might later need support. This allows the therapeutic nature of 1st grade circle time to fully mature the developing child and remediate any challenges which aren't severe. In other words, learning has its foundation in the inner health and development of the child. Waldorf education starts with the child, develops that inner health in 1st grade and Kindergarten so that the foundation for learning is secure, and then moves slowly towards academics observing each child at each step of the game. It's a well documented phenomenon that children who do need help in building this foundation for learning may take a couple of years to do so, after which their reading excels at exponential rates. High reading comprehension is a skill in Waldorf graduates across the board. Colleges admissions officers know this to be a fact.

In essence, Waldorf Education takes the time in the early grades to do everything possible to make sure that the child is a balanced, harmonious individual on all levels, remedial to creative. This time and care builds a robust foundation for learning that provides the child with strength throughout their lives to meet obstacles and overcome them, all the while enjoying a love of learning and creativity.

How does Waldorf teach math?

Waldorf Education's approach to mathematics begins where math begins, in the will of the child. How many of ourselves, as children, felt math to be incomprehensible, insurmountable jumble of squiggly marks on a page that signified the lackluster point in the day? Math is in essence a kinesthetic learning experience for the 1st grade child. Moving to math is essential in the early grades so that elementary mathematical concepts reside first in the nature of the will, where they eventually become part of the muscle memory of the young child much like their close counterpart music. Let's live with that image for a moment. Most people find it quite profound that music has a mathematical quality about it. But what if we take a different perspective? What if math had a musical quality about it? What if the human body could learn math much in the same way a musician trains himself to play an instrument? That is the approach Waldorf takes to math. The child, through moving to math in the early grades, develops a proficiency much like a musician memorizing his scales. All four processes are addressed early in 1st grade through fun and enlivened movement. Once a child is moving to math, he or she may begin to use manipulatives (such as beans or glass beads) to understand the relationships that the our processes represent. This is done through telling imaginative math tales where the children get to participate by solving the same word problems the main characters solve. This allows for a "living" math to develop within the children; one that freed by imagination can take on a life of its own.

But before we bring our excitement for math up to a fevered pitch, it's important to talk a bit about the numbers themselves. The numbers are the first real contact children have with universal mystery. Numbers are highly philosophical, and this nature will speak to the children in a profound way. We begin in the classroom by asking the question, "What is the largest number in the universe?" The children love to answer this question. "A googleplex!", "Infinity!", "Ten hundred million billion gazillion!" are common answers. So when the Waldorf teacher says, "The largest number in the universe is 1", the children react quite excitedly. "What!?" And after the teacher assures them that they are not the butt of a joke, the children go deeply inward to discover "why" the largest number is indeed 1.

The concepts at which they arrive are astounding. "One is the biggest because without it there isn't any 2, or 3, or even a million." "One is the biggest because everything there is is in one Universe." "One is the biggest because it can be any number it wants." All sorts of philosophical and mathematical truths become evident through just this "one" discussion. Eventually the children arrive at "I am one!", they see how their bodies are shaped like the number one, they relate themselves to the vastness of the Universe, and realize at that point that they are co-creators. Each number, 1-12, is a discussion involved in this deep intensity of imagination. We begin with Roman numerals and incorporate geometry into the discussion of each number, scribing freehand the relative polygons and stars. The children work diligently to master each of the stars, crossing the vertical midline over and over again as they practice on large sheets of paper. Eventually, a particular star will stand out as the class favorite which tells the Class Teacher an immeasurable amount about the class itself. All of this happens in 1st grade.

So from the get go, children are aware of the significance of numbers and enter very deeply into them. When they
1. have the imaginations of the numbers,
2. use their will to execute stars and polygons,
3. move their bodies through the math facts of all four processes (+ - / x) DAILY,
4. take part in music classes involving flute, voice, and lyre to illustrate the beauty of the voice of numbers, and
5. use manipulatives to work through exciting math tales and classroom conundrums...
a genuine love of math can only be enhanced by the practical approach in the mid to later grades. One can't help but think that the third grade curriculum of learning fractions through cooking and building complements the introduction of the orchestral stringed instruments at that same time. Cooking is a symphony of tastes. Architecture is an opus of space. Math is the key to participating in the music of life. It is everywhere. The sixth grader gets to experience this by working with the Fibonacci sequence and Euclidean to Platonic geometries, creating spiritual symphonies one can only hear if one has the ears to do so. Waldorf Education seeks to help them develop these capacities.

How do art and stories help to teach academic subjects?

Waldorf education holds true the idea that human beings are here to create and develop. So, I would pose this question: how do academic subjects help to teach Art and Stories? If we approach every academic subject as capable of being elevated to the level of Art, and support the students in achieving this, they will learn to be Artful in all that they do. If we approach every academic subject as being a way for them to Artfully write the Story that is their life, the children will seek to do so. But let me return to the meat of your question.

Art and story bestow meaning. They engage the child in a fashion that cannot be met with abstracted conceptualization. With art and story, academic subjects take on a life they do not posses on their own. Art and story are the "breath of life" for any academic subject, and without them the learned material dies, ceases to have meaning other than the husk of the concept itself. Waldorf Education seeks to impart a living form of learning which takes on a life of its own and is capable of leading the individual student into new ways of tackling old problems. Two quotes of Einstein come to mind here, "Imagination is more important than knowledge, " and "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking that created them." In the first quote he wasn't writing knowledge off as unimportant, he was stating that dead knowledge is useless and that imagination is needed to enliven it. In the second, which by far is the most provocative I believe, he calls to task the embedded modern belief that there is "nothing new under the sun" and that it has "all been done before". Our current castrated mode of thought is the direct by-product of an educational system which doles stones of knowledge out to its helpless pupils instead of enlivening their thinking so that it takes on new evolved dimensions to solve the puzzles and tragedies of humanity. Some individuals manage, though rebellion to this deadened paradigm, to maintain a degree of inspired thought. They are the ones who are making a difference today. Waldorf Education seeks to allow every student the opportunity to be the change they want to see in the world through actually encouraging enlivened thinking through the incorporation of story and art in each academic subject. Instead of starving the type of thinking that will make a difference, Waldorf nourishes it in each and every child.

What are the advantages of having the same teacher/students each year from 1st to 8th grade. Are there any problems you have faced with this arrangement?

This is a question that comes often to the Waldorf Teacher from parents new to the movement. Having the same teacher through eight years of schooling seems to fly in the face of our own educational experience and causes us to ask, "Why?" We then remember our worst teacher ever and think to ourselves, "My God, what if I had been stuck for eight years with that person!?" Its a legitimate question, no doubt! The answer to those tough questions can be found mainly in the testimonials of parents who have had the Waldorf experience, but I will try to answer your question from the point of view of both a Class Teacher and a Waldorf parent.

I cannot emphasise how much my training as a Waldorf teacher has prepared me to meet the challenge of a relationship based form of education. Waldorf teachers are cultivated in their training to embrace self development and hone their social skills. Those who feel that inner development and social skills are unimportant in education or who cannot move through these obstacles with an open mind fall by the wayside and find something else to do with their lives. Those that work diligently at improving their own levels of compassion, manage their anger, hone their observational skills, and cultivate a open mind usually find themselves employed at a Waldorf School. Financially healthy schools will hire teachers mostly based on personal development, the ability to teach, and interpersonal skills. That is why a healthy school make take quite a long time to hire a teacher; they develop a relationship with the candidate to see if that person has the temperament they desire to take a specific class.

There is an emphasis on ethics and morality in the life of the teacher which is approached through meditation and the arts in the teacher training. This enlivens ethical and moral consciousness beyond a dogmatic approach and actually creates a very open minded outlook and a loving capacity to stand in the shoes of another. This is what you typically find as a base line of consciousness in a certified Waldorf Class Teacher and what is emphasised in the "Foundation Studies" of the teacher training program. This is also why Waldorf Certification is so important and those who have received only public school training may find it a difficult row to hoe to be with one class for eight years.

The benefits of having a teacher who has undergone Waldorf teacher training are based in the idea that you have an individual who is committed to meeting the needs of the class, guiding it, and growing with the children. The Class Teacher works with a mantra that helps them stay exciting, inspired, and loving. It goes like this:

"Imbue yourself with the Power of Imagination. Have Courage for the Truth. Sharpen your feeling for Responsibility of Soul."

Power of Imagination, Courage for Truth, and Responsibility of Soul are lofty tenets for any one's aspirations. Concentration on such a mantra among others works wonders within the teacher, and helps them stay alert during the whole of the 8 year class cycle. This means that they remain available when conflicts arise and try to see things objectively yet compassionately. If the teacher is lucky they have considerable support through the combined expertise of other faculty members and an active, qualified mentor who advises them in a variety of situations. This support helps the teacher maintain his or her bearings and helps ensure an open minded, friendly, growth oriented relationship with parents in the class. In addition, being with the children for 8 years allows a teacher to really get to know the individuals in the class and be able to measure each child's progress against a personal best and encourage a child to grow as much as possible. The Class Teacher works closely with the family during the 8 years of instruction and is able to cultivate a genuine growth in the children in the class through long term observation and interaction with each individual.

I personally haven't found any problems with the arrangement, but there have been cases where a teacher was deemed "not right" for the class after all and encouraged to pursue other avenues of development. This can be impactful for everyone in the class and school community. Teachers themselves have life changing events where teaching must wait as they take care of ailing elderly parents or other such emergencies arise. My son lost his Class Teacher in the 2nd grade and it was really earth shattering, but we all lived and now she is one of my dearly beloved colleagues at a different school!

How do you handle the more energetic children in your classroom with dignity and yet still bring order?

The first line of support for the energetic child is the classroom rhythm. The rhythm is set by the teacher in such a way that it lends itself to the needs of the class, depending upon the overall energy level. There are moments where the class is breathing in (taking things in a deeply concentrated way) and there are moments where the class is breathing out (art, active imagining, movement). Story is the only time when both breathing in and breathing out are combined, which makes it the crown jewel of the Waldorf Main Lesson. The energetic child soon learns that there will, indeed, be a time where movement is encouraged and that it won't be long in coming. This develops two things: 1. the will to sit as well as one can through the sitting parts and 2. trust that their need for movement will be met. Depending upon the preponderance of energy in the class, the teacher will alter the rhythm so that the children get ample opportunity to both move out with body and imagination and to go inward in thought and feeling.

In the earlier grades, Class Teachers will also form the class culture through songs, verses and cues that let the children know they have some time (by the end of the verse or song) to collect themselves into the right configuration for an upcoming activity. In addition, great emphasis is placed in engaging the children when they are seated so that the lesson becomes all absorbing. All of these supports will help the energetic child as well as the low energy student come into oneness with the class. If there are children in the class who have issues that cause them to move an inordinate amount, beyond what is addressed by the rhythm of the classroom itself (especially vestibular, proprioceptive, or impulse control issues) the teacher will suggest support lessons for the child to help her or him integrate her or his body so that the child can know where they are in space without constant stimulation. In the meantime, the teacher and the child will work towards some sort of positive reinforcement for surmounting the "staying seated during seated times" situation. What that is depends a great deal upon the individual, the class, and the Class Teacher.

The Waldorf teacher knows, through careful observation, regular assessment, and collegial input which children have an energetic personality and should muster their will forces to stay seated during seated times and which others have genuine issues that actually make it very uncomfortable for them to remain seated. For the latter, the classroom support may consist of sitting on a particular type of balance cushion or even a one legged stool. That way they are working on remediating the issue as well as remaining seated during the appropriate times. Some Class Teachers have such a preponderance of needs in the class that they opt to have the entire class sit on one-legged stools. It helps the ones that need it and doesn't hurt the ones who don't. The rest is left in the hands of the Class Teacher to follow through with the will and the protocol it takes to have an entire class of students who sit upon chairs that crash loudly to the floor if a child unwittingly gets up without proper control of the stool! Sounds impossible, but it has been successfully done!

Do you identify different learning styles and intelligences and then work with them?

Because Waldorf is a foremost a holistic, therapeutic education we first seek to build that strong foundation of physical integration in every child. We then build upon our knowledge of each child's integrative constitution to separate "learning style" from "survival mechanism". This is vital if we as educators are to integrate for wholeness so that a child can have the ability, the freedom, to do what he or she chooses in adult life. An adult who leans on gifts while never developing their weak areas does not operate in true freedom. It is this true freedom that Waldorf Education seeks to give its graduates. But to answer your question more plainly, yes, we do.

One of the most powerful gifts a teacher can give a student is to see with that student's perspective and acknowledge said perspective in teaching. We are all individuals and as such have the need for our individuality to be seen and met. One of the ways Waldorf teachers work with this is to know, for instance, the dominances of their students. Eye, ear, brain, hand, and foot dominances can tell the teacher a lot about whether a child is primarily a gestalt learner or primarily an analytical one, or whether there will be issues related to cross dominance. When under stress, a child's dominant side for each will shut down and the non-dominant side will act in its place. If a child is right eared dominant and he is stressed out, he will need a method of calming down before he will "hear" anything that goes into the right ear, the left ear, being undominant is unsatisfactory as well. Many Waldorf teachers use beanbag exercises or Bal-a -viz-x to regain integration from a child who has become stressed and shut down his or her dominant side.

In addition, we work with four types of temperaments in the grades. Depending upon the temperament, Class Teachers can engage a child in the way that they go about learning a particular subject. Even though there are four temperaments I have yet to meet a child that was purely one to the exclusion of all others. Typically there will be a dominant one, with stress or delight reactions gravitating towards the temperaments to either side. Because Waldorf teaches to all the mainstream learning styles by way of the curriculum itself and through the breathing of the class rhythm, visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learners are all met in the classroom.

Waldorf education is one that builds strength in all of what is now known as the "multiple intelligences". The Class Teacher will recognize a student's gifts in one or several of the intelligences, but also strive to help them round out the ones in which they display a need to grow. In that respect it is truly a balanced education. One even wonders if Howard Gardner discovered multiple intelligences much like Columbus discovered the New World. Even though his ideas were new and quite impactful to mainstream education in 1983 with the publication of Frames of Mind , the concept of what he described as "multiple intelligences" was already in practice in Waldorf schools and had been for almost 50 years. Not to downplay the immense sociological and pedagogical mainstream impact of Dr. Gardner's work in any way, mind you. Educators are inspired and rightly so by the focused and heartfelt endeavors of this amazing man. But we should recognize that his life work supports the pre-existent Waldorf approach, though Waldorf pedagogues will not necessarily use the same terminology or go about implementing his ideas in a systematic way.

What progress have you seen in your students now that the year is coming to a close – in terms of behavior, academic achievement, confidence, artistic talent?

The first grade classroom is such an exciting place! It always begins in chaos and ends in order, provided a class culture has been formed, the rhythm has met the children, and they have learned to breathe out and in (as described above) in a healthy way. In the beginning, the first thing the children want to know, "What does it mean to be in a classroom?" and we give them rules so they know. The rest of the year is comprised with working with the precious individualities in the class to help them understand that the boundaries are the boundaries in a loving, fun, and exciting way. Time for work, time for play. Time to eat, time to rest. Time to be loud, time to be quiet. Time to be outside (different rules!) time to be inside. Maybe this friend is a good work partner, and this one is great for playtime! It is magical watching the capacities of the children develop, watching the class knit into a community. The social development of the class culture is one of the main considerations in the education. Can these wonderful individual children, guided by the Class Teacher and their parents and supported by the school itself create community? Of course they can!

All of the children are artists, each with his or her own different signature style. The Waldorf methods allow the teacher to truly witness the essence of each child's artistic nature by noticing his or her unique signature in artistic "studies" (where they all paint or draw or sculpt the content given by the teacher, displaying the inner nature of their style) as well as in "free-rendering" (they choose the medium and contextual content). The art of the children in the classroom never ceases to amaze me, and with this 1st grade it is no different. Vibrant, alive, unique, and even jaw dropping.

Artistic and musical ability along with classroom (behavioral) skills were overall the most prolific gains represented in the classroom this year with a majority of the class meeting "secure" or "prolific" goals in these areas. A majority of the children in the class are also secure to prolific in areas related to the Alphabet, Numbers 1-100, the Four Processes, and "skip counting" (counting by 2s, 3s,5s,10s,11s forwards and backwards while moving in time with the class). Most were still developing in writing, which in my book depends upon being able to write from dictation with correct letter and number orientation, and correct stroke and grip. Many children in 1st grade are still practicing how to make their letters and numbers correctly with the correct grip and stroke. I find improvements across the board in these in 2nd grade after a summer of healthy outdoor play, and expect the same with this class of 26.

Reading is not quantifiably measured until 2nd grade, but at the moment I have abilities ranging from complete disinterest to vigorous chapter book reading in the class. Most of the parents have been with Waldorf since the beginning, aren't too concerned at the close of 2nd grade and haven't been pushing their children in any way other than to read to them regularly. The range is completely based upon the readiness of the individual and there is no reading hierarchy in the class at the close of 1st. Next year we will focus even more on dictation, reading from readers we create, and further writing in our Main Lesson Books and in our nature journals.

What led you into Waldorf teaching?

My dear children, specifically my son Breandan, led me to Waldorf. I knew he was going to need a pretty special education because he was by no means an easy child. Waldorf showed me how to better support him with his particular needs with amazing results, and because of my involvement in his school I became aquainted with the methods. Encouraged by the faculty, I got my teacher training at Rudolf Steiner College in Sacramento beginning in 2005 and graduating in 2008. I cannot stress enough the positive effect becoming a Waldorf teacher has had on the life of my family and my own personal renewal. I am grateful.

Monday, July 6, 2009

Choosing the Right School for Your Child

Laura Barr is the driving force behind e.Merging, formerly Denver School Solutions. She helps parents find the best school fit for their children by identifying the values and goals of the parents, and the learning styles and interests of the child. Anyone who has considered the myriad school options for their family knows that this is a huge challenge. I recently shared coffee and questions with Laura.

How do you help families find the best school fit for their children?

I start by understanding the family values. I give a five-page questionnaire before I even meet the family. It helps them to concretely identify what is important to them and provides a point of navigation for the rest of our meetings. The questions ask the parents about their dreams for their children and about their educational experiences, among other things. Then I look at the child, asking what kind of learner is he? What are his sensitivities, his strengths, and his challenges? The best time to start this is when the child is three years old or any time after. It is easier to start early rather than late.

How did you get started doing this?

I have a Master's in Early Childhood and Elementary Education and my focus was educational philosophies. For the past 10 years I owned a Music Together Center and was always asked by parents for advice on school matters. After I sold that business I integrated all of my knowledge of being an Admissions Director, teacher and coach began coaching families and empowering them to make confident choices in parenting and education. The first year I helped over 100 families with school choices and coaching on intentional parenting.

Why is it so difficult to find a school on your own?

There is so much information, so many philosophies, and so many choices that it makes the job of a intentional parents difficult to navigate to find the best school for their child. There are charter schools, neighborhood schools, beacon schools, magnet, schools, private schools and so on. They all have a different focus and different things to offer families and students. If you look at their websites they all tend to say similar things, like “we teach to the whole child” and “we offer a rigorous academic program”, but it is really hard to figure out what exactly makes each school different if you only use the glossy marketing materials in your search. I share my knowledge of the schools in the Denver metro area to go well beyond statistics and marketing messages to make informed decisions that are in alignment with the values and goals of the family.

What criteria are used when choosing the schools?

In addition to the process I follow, there are considerations like program offerings (do they have arts or sports and are those important?), student-teacher ratio, school stability, philosophy, leadership, culture, diversity and aesthetics. Do they offer before and after school care? What about summer programs? How about financial aid or scholarships if that is necessary? Do they have gifted programs or special education that will be necessary for your child?

What is the geographic area you work in?

I work in metro Denver, Littleton, Jefferson County, and Cherry Creek, though I can help any family anywhere, visiting schools on my own time. The knowledge you gain from the process is portable in that once you identify what is important to you it is not as hard to match that with a school. I often help parents who are going to be moving in to this area and have no idea what the education choices are when determining where to move. I help them identify the best schools for them to help them not only make informed decisions about school choice, but about where to move once that is in place.

Do you help procure scholarships or reduced admissions?

I inform families about processes and timing. I walk them through the time-consuming process and make sure deadlines and requirements are met.


Do you help with college as well?

No, there are already plenty of services that exist for that kind of thing, and the choices are nation-wide, of course, involving a lot of travel and certification through colleges and universities. I discovered this niche because there wasn’t anything out there to help with elementary through high school.

Do most families come to you after a bad experience, from out of town, or before school age has come?

Most are intentional families that start early in the pre-school ages looking to make the right choices up front. About 5-10% come to me after experiencing a disastrous school experience and want to make better decisions for a better school experience. About 2% are families that are moving here and need someone experienced in this area to help them make appropriate choices about school and location.

What are other services you offer?

I offer coaching and consulting - in general I inform parents to advocate for the education of their children. I make referrals to reputable psychologists if that is necessary. I coach parents on fostering literacy for their children. I guide parents to get their thoughts, actions, words and philosophy in alignment so that their decisions come more easily with the end goal in mind.

To learn more about how an educational consultant can help you with intentional parenting or school choice, go to e.Merging’s website at http://www.e-merging.org/

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Wanted: General Employee

WorkWorld is 200-year old unchanging industrial company dedicated to producing standardized widgets and superior scores on high-stakes reviews, regardless of market demand. The company is proud to offer a rigorous, rigid environment that promotes well-rounded employees who are responsible for work in all departments, which are structured as unconnected silos. Due to heavy turnover, WorkWorld is constantly looking for General Employees.

Requirements include:

• Willingness to perform seemingly meaningless tasks without question
• Propensity to work with isolated, fact-based data that is driven by the review process
• Superior rote memorization
• Commitment to performing only those duties outlined in the standardized review, and not more
• Willingness to labor alone (collaboration is cheating) and to show your work (use of calculators is cheating).
• Maniacal focus on the clock. You must be at work from exactly 7:25 AM to exactly 3:30 PM with a 15 minute lunch break
• A low attention threshold with the ability to switch focus to a different department every 50 minutes when a bell is rung.
• Willingness to take work home nightly, including weekends and vacations (two to four hours daily)
• Exceptional bladder control – bathroom passes are limited

Responsibilities Include:
• 50-minute workloads in the following departments: Accounting, Sales, Marketing, Manufacturing, Distribution, Customer Service and Software/Hardware Design (note: the Customer Service and Software/Hardware Design Departments are inoperative, though attendance and production in these departments is mandatory nonetheless)
• You will be assigned to a different micro-manager in each department and expected to conform to his or her leadership style
• No talking
• Raise your hand if you have something to say

Equal Employment Opportunity
WorkWorld is committed to employing a diverse, multicultural body of employees in an atmosphere that values compliance, respect for authority, the conventional, and quiet. All employment decisions are made without regard to emotional intelligence, competency, critical thinking, creativity, innovation, or even interest in the job.

To apply, fill out this scantron sheet with a number two pencil, filling all of the bubbles in completely.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Dyslexia Resources

Cindy Baumert is the Executive Director of Dyslexia Solutions, Inc., a not-for-profit 501c3 corporation that supplies RAD Prism glasses to people who struggle with dyslexia. I talked to Cindy after she read an article on my blog about vision therapy.

Dyslexia is often misunderstood and most people assume that it refers to transposing some letters in a word. According to the National Center for Learning Disabilities, dyslexia is the most prevalent learning disability (LD) and is a neurological problem. The formal definition as identified by the International Dyslexia Association is “characterized by difficulties with accurate and/or fluent word recognition and by poor spelling and decoding abilities. These difficulties typically result from a deficit in the phonological component of language that is often unexpected in relation to other cognitive abilities and the provision of effective classroom instruction. Secondary consequences may include problems in reading comprehension and reduced reading experience that can impede growth of vocabulary and background knowledge.”

According to the Yale Center for Dyslexia & Creativity, some early signs of dyslexia include:
• Trouble learning common nursery rhymes, such as “Jack and Jill”
• Difficulty learning (and remembering) the names of letters in the alphabet
• Seems to be unable to recognize letters in his/her own name
• Mispronounces familiar words; persistent “baby talk”
• Doesn’t recognize rhyming patterns like cat, bat, rat
• Reading errors that show no connection to the sounds of the letters on the page—will say “puppy” instead of the written word “dog” in an illustrated page with a dog shown
• Does not understand that words come apart
• Complains about how hard reading is, or “disappearing” when it is time to read
• Cannot sound out even simple words like cat, map, nap
• Does not associate letters with sounds, such as the letter b with the “b” sound

They also mention some strengths that are common in people with dyslexia that include a larger vocabulary for the age group, a great imagination, excellent problem or puzzle solving ability, and excellent comprehension of spoken stories, among other things.

Cindy, how did Dyslexia Solutions Inc. get started and how do the prism lenses work?

The RAD Prism came about from years of investigation by Dr. Robert Dahlem, DVM (yes, a veterinarian) in his quest to help his son who was diagnosed severely dyslexic who continued to struggle with learning how to read despite high levels of intelligence and attending a private school specializing in instructional methods for dyslexia. What Dr. Dahlem discovered in observing the population of students at the specialized school was a high rate of facial asymmetry, specifically that the left pupil placement was closer to the nose than the right. Dr. Dahlem also investigated every biological system in the human body to try to trace the symptoms of dyslexia and it’s cause.

Upon experimenting with the phenomenon of facial asymmetry and it’s affect on how the brain interpreted information, Dr. Dahlem discovered that by placing a prism of a specific base size in the right eye only helped his son, who had normal vision and eye functionality, to perceive the written word correctly and be able to read fluently. At that point, Dr. Dahlem considered his investigation a success, pleased with the results that his son was receiving from his invention he looked forward to concentrating on his veterinary practices.

But the story did not end there, for friends of his son who were plagued by the same symptoms asked to try the prism and they saw the same improvement. Through word of mouth, Dr. Dahlem started to see individuals who would come to his veterinary hospital to find out if the prism would also help them or their child. When the number of people reached in the hundreds, Dr. Dahlem decided that this invention might not be a fluke that only helped his son and formed a non-profit in 2006 for the mission of evaluating the effectiveness of the RAD Prism in the general population.

In 2008, I became the Executive Director of the non-profit and Dr. Dahlem returned to being a full time veterinarian at his animal hospitals. We developed a website for the general public to have access to the RAD Prism to evaluate and give us feedback.

I did an article on vision problems and vision therapy recently. How is this approach similar and different? Do you help different populations?

Anyone who wants to evaluate the RAD prism may do so. I don’t know how the RAD Prism compares to vision therapy, but to my knowledge vision therapy is meant to correct visual deficits such as convergence insufficiency. We encourage anyone who is going to try the RAD Prism to first be evaluated by an eye-care professional to rule out any issue with the eye that might be causing reading difficulty.

How can low-income families afford the glasses?

Low-income families who cannot afford the fee are encouraged to work with their local civic organizations such as the Optimist and Lions Club, as well as school PTAs and family resource centers. We do charge a fee to receive the RAD Prism to cover the cost of the manufacturing and distribution of the RAD Prism, but we refund anyone who wants to return the prism for any reason, we replace broken frames free of charge and we trade sizes of RAD Prism free of charge.

Can schools get the glasses to help identify students that are dyslexic, rather than mentally or visually impaired?

In addition to the PTA or other fund raisers, schools have used federal IDEA funds to cover the fee.

For more information on the RAD Prism glasses from Dyslexia Solutions, go to: www.readfluent.com

Another great resource on dyslexia, including more early signs, strengths, strategies, reading lists, and much more, visit the website at Yale Center for Dyslexia & Creativity http://dyslexia.yale.edu/index.html

Monday, June 22, 2009

The Strengths Movement - an Interview with Jenifer Fox

Jenifer Fox is the author of “Your Child’s Strengths: Discover Them, Develop Them, Use Them”, a book that radically proposes a change from our current focus on improving weaknesses as a means for academic achievement to a strengths-based paradigm. She passionately makes the case that not only will children feel more empowered, confident, and self-aware with this paradigm, it helps them to optimize their education and their career choices. The book contains workbook tools to help to identify strengths at any age, making it a great book for parents, teens, graduates, and those searching for a new career. It ought to be required reading before leaving school! Also included in the book is an outline of the Affinities Program that she developed at her school. I admired the book’s premise and was delighted at the opportunity to interview Jenifer.

In the book you mentioned a painful time in college trying earnestly to understand math without any compassion or cooperation from your professor. It seems that adversity for you became empowering. Why not let kids struggle with their weaknesses like you did, much in the way a butterfly struggles out of the cocoon?


I think a much better approach is letting kids struggle with their strengths. A butterfly is struggling against its strengths. Developing talent is always hard work. If adversity led to my success just think of how far I could have gone with a focus on my strengths. Adversity was painful. It was like poking a needle through the cocoon and saying, "take that, it'll help you grow". I don't know why some people are resilient but most are not. Life in its best state has struggle built in. Struggle is good. There is a difference between struggle and challenge. Our schools often make kids feel punctured through the core.

The strengths you write about fit within multiple intelligences, not just academic. Can you give some examples? How do these multiple intelligences work in a school setting?

I think kids live in two realms: what they do and what their relationships are. The ways they learn will determine how their strengths are activated in the two realms. One of the things we expect but don't teach is how to get along with others. On the end, it is arguably more important than what you know.

What is the difference between strengths and talents or strengths and interests?

Great question. This is the core of my philosophy and I think my definition separates me from other strengths thinkers. An interest is like a topic. It is general. For example, I am interested in writing. A strength is about how you feel doing something. It is a verb. It is the feeling of being energized, excited, and tuned in. A talent is what you are good at. You may not be energized by everything you are good at. I am good at wallpapering. But it doesn't energize me. I am energized by singing, though I have no talent for it. People have the best chance at developing true talent in their areas of strength because they will devote more time to those activities. As I said before, developing talent takes time and focus. It's easier to focus if you are energized by it.

Education in a public setting is standards-based, including standardized testing, requiring students to focus on subjects that may not be of interest to them, or that may outside of their strengths. What is essential to learn or know in school and what is or could be in the category of an elective?

I think we need to ask what can schools teach that can't be learned somewhere else? It used to be the teacher was the expert, the access to information that only could be gotten by their extensive education. Teachers were revered for their knowledge. They were the computer of the past. We don't need to teach subjects anymore. We need to teach literacy, social skills, creativity, problem solving, how to get along, persevere and do the right thing. We need a national conversation on a new national curriculum that includes emotional and physical health.

A conventional public education often sets a pace for the child whether that pace matches the child or not. How do you determine what is a pacing issue (like being forced to learn to read too early) or a strengths issue?

Great question. Strengths are what energize you. You like doing it. Your question is about development. We all develop and grow at different rates and times. I don't think there is a definitive answer to this. I will say that I think our pedagogy is limited. We think it's impossible to differentiate in a large classroom. I don't think so. Any teacher can list all the weaknesses of over 30 students in their classrooms. So why is it suddenly so difficult to see what they are energized by?
There are many different alternative schools that attempt to notice a child’s strengths and nurture them.

What education models seem to do a better job of this than others?

Montesorri, Waldorf, and a lot of Independent schools.

How can all schools implement this strengths curriculum?

I am in the process of making a six-week, multimedia, activity-based version of the Affinities Program called Planet Strengths. All a school needs is a VCR and the desire for student success. This program is active, media driven and kid-centered. It's going to blow schools away when it comes out.

What can parents do to help a child to know himself and his strengths and capitalize them?


Parents can ask kids questions. They should resist giving advice and applying their own autobiography. Strengths are about how a person feels. To encourage understanding about feelings, you need to ask a lot of questions.

What kind of inroads have you made in the public school arena and in the political arena with your ideas?

I have schools in Texas, Philadelphia, and California test marketing the program for success with a grant from the Best Buy Foundation.

For more information on the Strengths Movement, go to http://www.strengthsmovement.com/

Friday, June 19, 2009

Vision Therapy for Treating Learning Disabilities

When my son was in first grade at a public school he had a difficult time conforming to the reading pace they prescribed. Their way of helping him was to give him more of the same work to catch him up, keeping him in for recess and providing even more homework to do during free time. They did not have the knowledge or the resources to help him and it proved to be a very damaging year to his confidence and curiosity as a learner. As he was a late summer birthday and one of the youngest in his class, we decided to repeat first grade, though this time in a school that would honor his pace and nourish more than his academic output. We wanted a school that not only had art, but that integrated the arts throughout the curriculum. We wanted a school that did not set their curriculum and lesson plans by standardized testing. We were finished with worksheets! We chose a Waldorf school and the year could not have been more different. It was wonderful!

Before the year began, my son had a first grade readiness assessment through the Waldorf school that felt to him like a playdate. The assessment covered story telling, drawing, balance, singing, jumping and much more. It was incredibly comprehensive and through it they learned that he had a problem with eye tracking and it was deemed likely that this contributed to his reading troubles (along with his readiness). Because Waldorf teaches reading more gradually, not expecting full, independent reading until third grade, this was written up as something to watch for now. Within a month of that new school year his teacher noticed some vision problems and referred us to Accelerated Visual Performance, where we learned a lot about vision problems.

Dr. Manniko estimates that 20% of students in K-12 are learning disabled and of that group, 80% of these children experience visual problems that cause their learning issues. The diagnoses go beyond the 20/20 visual acuity, uncovering issues like amblyopia (lazy eye), strabismus (crossed eyes), general binocular problems (eyes failing to work together), etc. In addition to an eye examination, the child puts on a pair of special goggles and reads as a Visagraph tracks eye movements. It measures reading speed, next line identification, eye movement efficiency, backward movement and a number of other factors involved in reading.

According to Dr. Manniko, “Individuals who are learning disabled generally make significantly more eye movements and spend greater time focusing on each word, while getting less information than a strong reader. A common pattern among learning disabled individuals is that their eyes do not function together, hindering their reading comprehension.”

My son was diagnosed with Exophoria (his eyes pointed outward and had trouble working together at that angle) and Accomodation Disfunction (he had trouble seeing clearly when looking back and forth from far to near, like from blackboard to paper on his desk). Dr. Manniko and his staff set up a vision therapy program for him to help him overcome these problems. This also resembled a playdate twice a week for a few months. He wore goggles that resembled overlarge Harry Potter glasses with adjustable lenses. The lenses helped his eyes to work together better. While wearing the lenses he threw basketballs, jumped on trampolines, walked the balance beams and played games that involved finding, tracking or aiming among other exercises.

According to Dr. Manniko, visual training programs can help to improve reading speed, comprehension and accuracy. Though he does not claim it is a direct ‘cure’ for learning disabilities, he does say that it is effective in resolving associated visual problems, which he says are sometimes associated with ADD, ADHD, and dyslexia. Dr. Manniko even told me that a large percentage of prisoners have these undiagnosed vision problems and in one program they tested and performed vision therapy on a prison population with these issues and were able to reduce the recidivism rate by 50%! He is not claiming that people with vision problems will wind up in jail, but he pointed out that these are often the children that struggle and give up and don’t get the help that they need to function easily in society, so they turn to other means.

Even though he is not expected to read independently for another year or two, my son is now able to read! Waldorf and Vision Therapy have been largely responsible for restoring my son’s confidence, curiosity, and creativity. He is much happier kid with a stronger self-image. I frequently think about the kids that go undiagnosed and struggle in schools that cannot help them and feel so much empathy for them. I would love to see this kind of vision testing brought into schools. Dr. Manniko told me that the equipment needed for testing is not prohibitively expensive and that a technician can perform all of the work. How wonderful it would be to get all schools access to such a resource to help many of their struggling students!

For more information on Waldorf, go to www.whywaldorfworks.org. For more information on Vision Therapy, go to http://www.opticdynamics.com/

Monday, June 15, 2009

Race to Nowhere - an Interview with Filmmaker Vicki Abeles

I had heard about a film called “Race to Nowhere” that was in the works and I was lucky to catch a few moments of Vicki Abeles’ time to ask her about the film. Vicki founded Reel Link Films in 2007 and “Race to Nowhere”, their first film will premier this year. The documentary is a look into the stressful, activity-packed lives of students who are feeling the pressure to achieve.

What is the film about?

Race to Nowhere is a film examining the current state of childhood and education in America. The film asks the question, are we preparing the next generation for healthy, productive lives.

What brought about your work on this film?

After a series of wake up call in my family and community I set out to understand why childhood today looked so different than what I remembered from my own youth.

What change or work would you like to see as the result of this film?

Our intent is to start a national dialogue on education and the pressures our children and educators are under in the hopes of galvanizing change.

I often think there is a sense of economic fear that causes us to want our children to succeed, but there is a more sinister motive at play in that we put the burden of global competitiveness squarely on the shoulders of our children and expect them to rescue us and assure us a spot at the top of the competition. Do you think that is what is part of the pressure we put on them in school?

So much of what we see today seems to be the result of parental fears as well as fear at a national level that we are somehow slipping behind in this flattened world.

There are many models and ideas of education (Democratic Schools, Educating for Human Greatness, De-Schooling Society) that propose to allow students to learn and excel at what is interesting to them and teachers are more facilitators. In these models we don’t worry so much about setting a standard that everyone must live up to, whether they are interested or not. What are your thoughts on these kinds of models?

I think there are many experts in the field of education better equipped to handle this question. That said, I believe we need to move away from today's one size fits all approach and make education relevant to our kids and the 21st century.

The consequences of the pressure to succeed, meaning get good grades and high test scores, are many. Kids do not get play time, recess time, down time. Programs that smack of fun or are in any way less than academic, like art, drama, music, or even gym class are routinely cut to save money and time to devote to more academic studies. Why are these programs or activities important? Why is balance important?

Play is the work of childhood, and adolescents have the important work of figuring out who they are. When we sacrifice the downtime needed for these important developmental stages, we see many unintended consequences from stress and anxiety, to depression, disengaged learning, and a failure to develop life skills that are critical to adulthood. We fail to recognize the importance developing the right side of the brain - critical for future innovation.

How do we address the developmental needs of the whole child beyond academics (physical, emotional, social, etc.)?

We recognize that children develop at different rates, and have different strengths and challenges. We allow the down time to play, explore, work on social interactions, so vital to healthy adulthood.

Do you think standardized testing is the cause of the pressure to succeed? Are there other causes?

As you pointed out, fear drives so much of the pressure. Some of it comes from parents, some is student and peer driven and some comes from the teachers who are also feeling the pressure to hit the scores and satisfy the parents. A number of other factors contribute to the pressure. Broad standards that require teachers to teach to multiple choice tests, the media driven perception that there are only 20 colleges that will lead to success, a test and homework driven education model, and the pressure to build "resumes" for the college application.

Expert after expert in the field of child development, pediatrics, psychology and education have continually pointed to the necessity and the effectiveness of play-based Kindergarten, but more and more it is becoming learning-centered with the pressure to read and write at ever-earlier ages. What are the consequences?

There are many unintended consequences: loss of childhood; increasing rates of physical and emotional health issues in childhood (I am also concerned about the long term implications of seeing these medical problems at such a young age); sleep deprivation; use of performance enhancing medications to get through this pressure cooker system; compromised values because of a desire to get the grade at any cost; kids are dropping out; arriving in college burnt out; mental health offices on college campuses are stretched beyond capacity; the college drop out rate is high; and industry is telling us the graduates lack the skills to succeed in the workforce.

Daniel Pink, author of a Whole New Mind talks about the urgent need for creativity in schools and the work place. Sir Ken Robinson talks about finding your element, your passion and how that can more easily be accomplished through a richer curriculum. How does a school district with limited funds meet these needs and still foster academic achievement?

I believe schools can include these programs by first recognizing their importance in developing whole human beings. If we start moving away from the mentality of inexpensive, multiple choice tests focused on broad standards, teachers can build these programs into their curriculum with project based learning, etc. As well, businesses and local communities can work in partnership with local schools to help build these programs. First, we have to recognize the importance of these programs to the development of healthy, productive people. Transforming education and childhood doesn't require the funds to develop new technology or cures for a new disease. There are plenty of experts in the fields of education and child development that have solutions. We need to first raise awareness and engage in a national dialogue.

To learn more about the film and to see a trailer, visit: http://www.reellinkfilms.com/trailer.html

Thursday, June 11, 2009

What on Earth is Earthschooling? An Interview with Kristie Burns

Kristie Burns is an earthschooling mother of three children, ages 10, 12 and 14. Kristie works from home as a healer, artist and teacher. She ran a Waldorf Enrichment school from 2000-2004 and now provides curriculum, lesson plans and tips for other parents wanting to start their own co-ops, enrich their child's education, or embark on the earthschooling journey.

A recent report by the U.S. Department of Education's National Center for Education Statistics reported that approximately 1.5 million children (2.9 percent of school-age children) were being homeschooled in the spring of 2007, representing a 36 percent relative increase since 2003 and a 74 percent relative increase since 1999. In your experience, what factors have contributed to the rise in homeschooling?

One is the amount of resources that are now available to do homeschooling. When I was homeschooling my kids 10 years ago, the resources were not the same. The Internet makes these resources so available and easily accessed and it offers encouragement. You can ask questions, gets answers, get support, get ideas, see other people doing it successfully to inspire you to do it. Another factor is that public schools have started to cooperate with homeschools and offer them programs and assistance. It has given it a sense of acceptance and a stamp of approval that way.

How can homeschools avoid a sense of isolation?

Connecting with the available resources is easy these days. It’s almost the opposite problem. Before it was isolating, but recently I did a conference on information overload. Now there are so many opportunities in your community that you have to be selective – not every field trip or event or gathering is necessary. This would not have been an issue before.

Where do I start if I want to homeschool?

Each person needs to examine what is the motivation and inspiration behind the desire to homeschool. The place to start seems to be Yahoo Groups because there are lots of central conversations and these branch off with smaller groups and forums. On the Yahoo Groups page you can find groups for homeschooling boys, secular homeschooling, Montessori homeschooling, etc. … there are so many different flavors. A lot of people join 8-10 to start and pair it down to 2 or 3 once they get a sense for the style and feel most comfortable with a few of them. Here is a link to a yahoo group that is focused on Waldorf: (waldorfschoolonline@yahoogroups.com)...

The evidence suggests that homeschooled students tend to do as well as or sometimes better than their institutionally-schooled peers and Stanford, Yale, and Harvard have some of the most homeschool-friendly policies. How are homeschooled students well prepared for college and life?

Kids really adapt to their environment and if given the opportunity to learn, they will learn. It really depends on their environment. Some schools do this well, but homeschools tend to be more flexible, more able and willing to tailor the education to meet the child’s need, and to offer free time that the child needs to access creativity and intellect. One-on-one attention matters for some children, but not as much for others. Some do better with lots of kids around to influence them and motivate them. There are all sorts of learning styles. It’s all about what the child needs and what the child is provided by their learning environment. Homeschooling offers more opportunity to adapt and you know your child best. There is no perfect approach for everyone.

How do you provide a broad, challenging, balanced curriculum?

Balance is a combination of the child and the curriculum. There is no balanced curriculum. For instance, my son thinks in numbers and was doing his sister’s math problems in Kindergarten, so he needs to balance that with more creative experiences, knitting, time in nature. My youngest daughter is significantly creative, writing 100-page books in a few days. Balance for her is about balancing that creativity with a sense of discipline, a sense of order and organization – thinking in a different way, using both sides of the brain. That’s another reason homeschooling is great is because it is easier to create a balance in the day, there is no formula for it. As for challenging, there is a wonderful side of homeschooling that is very creative and experiential, but even if you don’t like math, you really do have to do your math. If there is resistance you have to find some way to overcome that and give them a broad educational experience. That part is not as fun, but it is part of the challenge. Continue to feed those breakthroughs and know what is appropriate for each age group to be learning. It gives you an idea of what to aim for realistically.

What led you to this work?

I was a photographer and an herbalist (and still am but not full time any more). I would do photo assignments and do consulting and classes and then when my children came along the number of people coming over and frequent travel started becoming disruptive. I tried to think of what I could do that would work better with my children. I started a co-op Waldorf School, and I ended up running it. It was Waldorf enrichment and then became a Kindergarten and it kept growing. Running this school took up all of my time in the evenings to do lesson plans, creating everything from scratch. This was in the Middle East where those resources and Internet access were very limited. There were 27 different cultures, and although it was Waldorf, I adapted it to match the seasons, cultures, and settings. If I didn’t find the perfect story, I would create it. It was a lot of work. After I ended up leaving the country, I was sad to not use these materials that were meant to be used for the next 10 years. Thus began the process of putting it online, which was a huge challenge and still occupies a lot of my work hours.

How do you currently help homeschool families?

Right now I offer lesson plans, curriculum, and enrichment through the Earthschooling.com website. I love feeling like I am part of people’s homeschooling experience. I still remember vividly how hard I worked on these materials and I am always updating them and adding to them. I love that they can be of use to people so that they don’t have to be overwhelmed like I was. The material that other people offer in Waldorf is very traditional; sometimes it doesn’t resonate with people. What I offer is created for many different cultures and settings. It is more adaptable and helpful to a wider audience. I hope that showing people the diversity that Steiner built into Waldorf education will bring more people into the community.

What is earthschooling?

Because of the opportunities that are available, today’s world is all about opportunities, information, and choices. Because of that and because we move more frequently, life today is so fluid. We need another term for homeschooling. To me, earthschooling signifies the adaptability and fluidity; you are focused on the education of your child to the needs of the moment without artificial barriers. It allows you to follow the flow of life. You can make the choices about tutoring, enrichment, afterschool, lesson plans, and curriculum without some rigid model to follow. If a certain style isn’t’ working, like Waldorf’s approach to math at a certain age, it gives permission and flexibility to give your children what they need in a different educational modality. Also, it is not just at home, it is grocery shopping, on a vacation, playing in nature, etc. It doesn’t stop; it’s a natural flow of life.
For more information on earthschooling visit: http://www.thewaldorfchannel.com or http://www.earthschooling.com/

For more information on Kristie's work in art go to: http://www.ImageNations.com and in healing go to: http://www.HerbnHome.com or http://www.TheAvicennaInstitute.com

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Changing the Way we Teach Math - an Interview with Paul Lockhart of "A Mathematician's Lament"

I came across an essay called “A Mathematician’s Lament” and was so moved by it that I had to share it. The essay starts with a musician having a bad dream that his craft is now compulsorily taught in schools in the way that we teach mathematics currently—devoid of beauty and fun. It goes on to show how math could be taught as art, full of meaning and pleasure and discovery. The essay became a book and I recently interviewed the author, Paul Lockhart on the subject of math and education.

How did you come to be a math teacher? Was it the result of a positive math education or in spite of bad math teaching?

I didn’t do particularly well in math. I think I got a D in eighth grade. Math instruction then was what it continues to be: a training course in the manipulation of symbols without meaning, procedures to learn and tasks to perform. It’s a lot like being at the DMV. It is a thing you have to do. You might see the validity and necessity of it, but you derive no pleasure from it and it’s certainly not something you would choose to do.

I stumbled on math accidentally, through puzzles with my grandfather and in finding my dad’s college textbooks and putting them together. It was then that I saw the wonderland of structure and beauty. It is so sad that so few people know about that. So for me, a big part of being a mathematician is being a teacher.

The world of research mathematicians is one of infinite mystery, with brave, intrepid mental explorers. Then there is the world of school and they have nothing to do with each other. Few mathematicians are interested in the lowly world of elementary school mathematics. Some have tried to help, but found it an infuriating instrument of torture, and left. In a small space of time I try to get across what it is to be a mathematician in a real, natural, and meaningful way.

I started teaching at 18 in an after-school program. I fell in love with telling kids about cool ideas. I went to graduate school and became a math professor, which was fun for a while, but I grew to feel that the world of the university was rather corrupt. I am an idealist and I was disappointed to discover that the university was not an ivory tower for the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake, but a machine for profit. I didn’t want to be part of that world. Also, by the time I got my students they were 20 and they were ruined already. They were tragically incapable of starting over or engaging in the real mathematics’ charm, mystery and beauty. So I felt that teaching high school would give me an opportunity to get to them earlier. But they are still mostly dysfunctional as mathematical thinkers and their math wounds run too deep. I have gone progressively down the chain, and am now teaching first and third graders as well.

How is it that schools fail to teach math in a way that shares with others its beauty and art?

School takes something real and chops it up into meaningless pieces with no organic whole to it. Learning doesn’t happen when it is so disconnected. What goes on in schools is not about learning. Instead you study something, take a test, and a few months later you have no memory or concern about that thing you supposedly “learned.” School is authority compliance testing and in the end you get a certificate of endurance. What we call “smart” is the ability to memorize meaningless data and retrieve it like a trained seal. The whole school thing is pretty nightmarish. Even in an enlightened, affluent, private setting it’s still there. I cringe when I hear a fellow teacher complaining about cheaters. How many more signals do you need to see that this is not interesting, that they are not learning?

I walk into a third grade classroom and on the board is the kids’ whole schedule. There is no natural flow through the day; it’s all cut up into pieces. An eight-year old should not have an end-time to her water coloring! It should be a natural flow through the day with time for daydreaming—that is what living an intellectual life is! If she feels she’s come to the end of her painting, and then wants to stop and play, that is a beautiful thing. Our school culture is quite insane, actually. A third grader recently told me at the start of the year that she only wanted to learn enough in my class to get a good score on the SAT so that she could get into Yale.

Think about what we ourselves do as learners and notice that you learn what you care about—you will pursue what you want and you will remember it. The emphasis in schools is on teaching, not learning. Real teaching is an uncovering or re-awakening. It is inspiration and revelation, not evaluation. The meaning of “student” in Latin is “having zeal.” Learning is not important, it is fun. There is no more noble purpose than enjoyment, fun, love and care for others. If kids are having fun then they are learning. I don’t believe in the utility of education as it is now understood. School should be about learning, thinking, creating, dreaming and exploring. Right now it is an engine of worker production to supply human capital for the economy.

We all went through this awful math experience. Then people grow up, have a kid or two, and now they suddenly believe in it and want their kids to have this same miserable math education? I don’t get it. “This was boring and awful in eighth grade, and it has not been useful to me as a successful adult, but I really want my child to do it.” I would understand it more if parents were storming the barricades in protest! People who admit no math ability feel that their opinion about math instruction is valid. That is mystifying. I can’t dance, but I know that, so I don’t give any dancing advice.

There is a myth that math will get you economic security, so parents fear that their child will not be able to handle adding some numbers together. Man has the ability to count. Left to their own devices they will figure it out. It is too early for 6, 7, 8 year olds to understand an abstract decimal code and 13th-century technologies. A 12-year-old would be ready to understand this and, without the fear and loathing for math, they would learn it so quickly and willingly.

After reading your book, I feel I was cheated in my math education. How can math instruction look and feel different?

The simple conclusion I have come to is that it should be treated as an apprenticeship, just like an 18th-century carpenter who has a dozen apprentices learning the trade. As a master carpenter, you teach your apprentices to pay attention to various details. You foster an understanding of what this art is all about. You teach them to measure and saw, but also to regard their work lovingly and to feel a connection to it.

I try to create a mathematical community at each stage of development. Students are engaged in the practice of mathematics, meaning the questions and ideas that are being raised come from them, not me. The students write mathematical papers in prose and diagrams (not worksheets) to present their explanation of the problem they are working on. It is the greatest thing ever for them to discover the solution themselves. I want people to see the breathtaking beauty and be charmed and intrigued.

Aside for practical applications like tipping and balancing checkbook why do we need to learn math?

We don’t need to learn math, any more than we need to learn poetry and music. As for the practical world, arithmetic procedures are mechanizable. All you really need is a good sense of estimation and the ability to use a calculator. I teach third graders to use a calculator and balance a checkbook. We should not be training children to be arithmetic machines. We build calculators so we don’t have to do these boring tasks. Running a lemonade stand and having to make change is real, and that kind of thing is the best way to learn basic arithmetic.

Math is usually thought of as a left-brained, linear, logical activity. Would you comment on that?

Math is like music and art. You need to use everything you’ve got: imagination, intuition, rationality—your whole self. You find connections and shatter preconceived ideas. If you are a composer, there are things happening on every creative level.

Do you use textbooks? If not, what tools do you use.

Textbooks are an abomination. Just as an English class has you read directly from “As I Lay Dying,” written by the actual author/artist, Faulkner, we should also have math books written by working mathematicians, not a committee of “educators” working for a textbook company. I do not give assignments, quizzes, tests or homework. My students are happy about that, but they discover that it is actually far more serious and difficult work: it is 24 hours a day of obsession with triangles. It is immersion in the most fascinating thing ever.

To read the original essay, “A Mathematician’s Lament,” go to: www.maa.org/devlin/LockhartsLament.pdf

The expanded book version of A Mathematician’s Lament is available from www.amazon.com